The "Pots and Pans" protests and requirements for responsiveness of the authorities

This paper examines under what conditions it is justifiable that the government takes into account the demands of protesters and whether the terms of procedural-equality in protest participation were met in the ‘Pots and Pans’ protests in Iceland in 2008–09. The protests were triggered by a financia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eva H. Önnudóttir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Iceland 2016-12-01
Series:Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.irpa.is/article/view/2482
id doaj-bc01afc5429a4b7fb69679eabbef3304
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bc01afc5429a4b7fb69679eabbef33042020-11-25T01:33:14ZengUniversity of IcelandStjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla1670-68031670-679X2016-12-0112219521410.13177/irpa.a.2016.12.2.12118The "Pots and Pans" protests and requirements for responsiveness of the authoritiesEva H. ÖnnudóttirThis paper examines under what conditions it is justifiable that the government takes into account the demands of protesters and whether the terms of procedural-equality in protest participation were met in the ‘Pots and Pans’ protests in Iceland in 2008–09. The protests were triggered by a financial melt-down in Iceland and did not come to an end until almost all the main demands of the protesters had been met. The main conclusion is that due to the seriousness of the issues which triggered the protests and that those issues were of national concern, together with the large numbers of protesters and wide support for their demands as well as extensive public discussion about the issues of the protests, they were a prime example of a situation when the authorities should consider taking the demands of protesters into account. Furthermore, in this paper it is established that giving in to the demands of the protesters was within the terms of procedural-equality between the protesters and those who did not participate – adding to the justification that, in this case, it was justifiable to defer to the protesters’ demands.http://www.irpa.is/article/view/2482Protestprotest participationprocedural-equality in participationgovernment responsiveness.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eva H. Önnudóttir
spellingShingle Eva H. Önnudóttir
The "Pots and Pans" protests and requirements for responsiveness of the authorities
Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla
Protest
protest participation
procedural-equality in participation
government responsiveness.
author_facet Eva H. Önnudóttir
author_sort Eva H. Önnudóttir
title The "Pots and Pans" protests and requirements for responsiveness of the authorities
title_short The "Pots and Pans" protests and requirements for responsiveness of the authorities
title_full The "Pots and Pans" protests and requirements for responsiveness of the authorities
title_fullStr The "Pots and Pans" protests and requirements for responsiveness of the authorities
title_full_unstemmed The "Pots and Pans" protests and requirements for responsiveness of the authorities
title_sort "pots and pans" protests and requirements for responsiveness of the authorities
publisher University of Iceland
series Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla
issn 1670-6803
1670-679X
publishDate 2016-12-01
description This paper examines under what conditions it is justifiable that the government takes into account the demands of protesters and whether the terms of procedural-equality in protest participation were met in the ‘Pots and Pans’ protests in Iceland in 2008–09. The protests were triggered by a financial melt-down in Iceland and did not come to an end until almost all the main demands of the protesters had been met. The main conclusion is that due to the seriousness of the issues which triggered the protests and that those issues were of national concern, together with the large numbers of protesters and wide support for their demands as well as extensive public discussion about the issues of the protests, they were a prime example of a situation when the authorities should consider taking the demands of protesters into account. Furthermore, in this paper it is established that giving in to the demands of the protesters was within the terms of procedural-equality between the protesters and those who did not participate – adding to the justification that, in this case, it was justifiable to defer to the protesters’ demands.
topic Protest
protest participation
procedural-equality in participation
government responsiveness.
url http://www.irpa.is/article/view/2482
work_keys_str_mv AT evahonnudottir thepotsandpansprotestsandrequirementsforresponsivenessoftheauthorities
AT evahonnudottir potsandpansprotestsandrequirementsforresponsivenessoftheauthorities
_version_ 1725078613738389504