Düzen ve Gaye Delili Üzerine Bir Analiz
In this paper, I examine the logical structure of teleological argument and D. Hume's critiques about it, then evaluate the arguments power and significance. Hume's critiques can be summed up in two main points. 1. About the premise of the argument: The concept of "theological order&q...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Turkish |
| Published: |
Ankara University
2015-11-01
|
| Series: | Dini Araştırmalar |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dergipark.gov.tr/da/issue/4449/61283?publisher=motifyayincilik |
| id |
doaj-bc190d8faaa24b84b7f7632b7feb7fcf |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-bc190d8faaa24b84b7f7632b7feb7fcf2020-11-24T23:04:28ZturAnkara UniversityDini Araştırmalar1301-966X2602-24352015-11-0141289Düzen ve Gaye Delili Üzerine Bir AnalizFerit UsluIn this paper, I examine the logical structure of teleological argument and D. Hume's critiques about it, then evaluate the arguments power and significance. Hume's critiques can be summed up in two main points. 1. About the premise of the argument: The concept of "theological order" is based on an anthropomorphic analogy and this is inappropriate. 2. About the conclusion of the argument: TheArgument doesn't lead us to the God of theistic religions. In the paper, different concepts of order are analyzed and according to this analysis Hume's critiques are discussed widely in the light of R. Swinburne's new formulation of the argument. At the end, in the light of those discussions, I investigate power and significance of the argumenthttp://dergipark.gov.tr/da/issue/4449/61283?publisher=motifyayincilik-GodArgumentTeleologyOrderDesignDavid HumeRichard Swinburne- |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
Turkish |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Ferit Uslu |
| spellingShingle |
Ferit Uslu Düzen ve Gaye Delili Üzerine Bir Analiz Dini Araştırmalar - God Argument Teleology Order Design David Hume Richard Swinburne - |
| author_facet |
Ferit Uslu |
| author_sort |
Ferit Uslu |
| title |
Düzen ve Gaye Delili Üzerine Bir Analiz |
| title_short |
Düzen ve Gaye Delili Üzerine Bir Analiz |
| title_full |
Düzen ve Gaye Delili Üzerine Bir Analiz |
| title_fullStr |
Düzen ve Gaye Delili Üzerine Bir Analiz |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Düzen ve Gaye Delili Üzerine Bir Analiz |
| title_sort |
düzen ve gaye delili üzerine bir analiz |
| publisher |
Ankara University |
| series |
Dini Araştırmalar |
| issn |
1301-966X 2602-2435 |
| publishDate |
2015-11-01 |
| description |
In this paper, I examine the logical structure of teleological argument and D. Hume's critiques about it, then evaluate the arguments power and significance. Hume's critiques can be summed up in two main points. 1. About the premise of the argument: The concept of "theological order" is based on an anthropomorphic analogy and this is inappropriate. 2. About the conclusion of the argument: TheArgument doesn't lead us to the God of theistic religions. In the paper, different concepts of order are analyzed and according to this analysis Hume's critiques are discussed widely in the light of R. Swinburne's new formulation of the argument. At the end, in the light of those discussions, I investigate power and significance of the argument |
| topic |
- God Argument Teleology Order Design David Hume Richard Swinburne - |
| url |
http://dergipark.gov.tr/da/issue/4449/61283?publisher=motifyayincilik |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT ferituslu duzenvegayedeliliuzerinebiranaliz |
| _version_ |
1725630145641840640 |