L’APPROCCIO LINGUISTICO ALL’INTERTESTUALITÀ E LA SUA APPLICABILITÀ ALL’ANALISI INTERMEDIALE

In comparison to literary studies, in linguistics there has been relatively little focus on intertextuality since the beginning of postmodernism. While research into intertextuality from the perspective of literary studies often resulted in the search for motifs, linguists repeatedly reached their l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gerda Hassler
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Università degli Studi di Torino 2019-12-01
Series:RiCognizioni
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ojs.unito.it/index.php/ricognizioni/article/view/3639
id doaj-bc321201221f456ea10cccfad097210b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bc321201221f456ea10cccfad097210b2021-09-14T07:27:18ZdeuUniversità degli Studi di TorinoRiCognizioni2384-89872019-12-0161210.13135/2384-8987/3639L’APPROCCIO LINGUISTICO ALL’INTERTESTUALITÀ E LA SUA APPLICABILITÀ ALL’ANALISI INTERMEDIALEGerda Hassler0Universitaet Potsdam, Università di TorinoIn comparison to literary studies, in linguistics there has been relatively little focus on intertextuality since the beginning of postmodernism. While research into intertextuality from the perspective of literary studies often resulted in the search for motifs, linguists repeatedly reached their limits when searching for linguistic reference points for intertextuality. Thus, Coseriu defined "repeated speech" as not analyzable and excluded it from his further considerations. Through the repetition and reuse of texts and parts of texts in the same text or as part of new textual contexts, conditions are created which cannot be explained with simple linearity of the use of language. The phenomenon of the texts in the text refers to dependencies and breaks in coherence, the marking of which is just as problematic as their contribution to the requirements for understanding the text and thus to the constitution of the text's meaning. Some languages have developed specific means which must be mandatorily used when the content of what has been communicated comes from a foreign source and not from one's own reflection. Since the need to mark the origin of the speaker’s knowledge seems to exist in all languages, these studies have also been extended to European languages in recent years. New possibilities for investigating the forms and functions of intertextuality also arise from the ease with which linguistic constructions can be found in corpora. These possibilities have not yet been developed for the analysis of multimodal language productions. Some considerations in this regard shall be presentedhttps://www.ojs.unito.it/index.php/ricognizioni/article/view/3639intertextualityfunctionsintertextual paradigmsmarkers of intertextuality
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gerda Hassler
spellingShingle Gerda Hassler
L’APPROCCIO LINGUISTICO ALL’INTERTESTUALITÀ E LA SUA APPLICABILITÀ ALL’ANALISI INTERMEDIALE
RiCognizioni
intertextuality
functions
intertextual paradigms
markers of intertextuality
author_facet Gerda Hassler
author_sort Gerda Hassler
title L’APPROCCIO LINGUISTICO ALL’INTERTESTUALITÀ E LA SUA APPLICABILITÀ ALL’ANALISI INTERMEDIALE
title_short L’APPROCCIO LINGUISTICO ALL’INTERTESTUALITÀ E LA SUA APPLICABILITÀ ALL’ANALISI INTERMEDIALE
title_full L’APPROCCIO LINGUISTICO ALL’INTERTESTUALITÀ E LA SUA APPLICABILITÀ ALL’ANALISI INTERMEDIALE
title_fullStr L’APPROCCIO LINGUISTICO ALL’INTERTESTUALITÀ E LA SUA APPLICABILITÀ ALL’ANALISI INTERMEDIALE
title_full_unstemmed L’APPROCCIO LINGUISTICO ALL’INTERTESTUALITÀ E LA SUA APPLICABILITÀ ALL’ANALISI INTERMEDIALE
title_sort l’approccio linguistico all’intertestualità e la sua applicabilità all’analisi intermediale
publisher Università degli Studi di Torino
series RiCognizioni
issn 2384-8987
publishDate 2019-12-01
description In comparison to literary studies, in linguistics there has been relatively little focus on intertextuality since the beginning of postmodernism. While research into intertextuality from the perspective of literary studies often resulted in the search for motifs, linguists repeatedly reached their limits when searching for linguistic reference points for intertextuality. Thus, Coseriu defined "repeated speech" as not analyzable and excluded it from his further considerations. Through the repetition and reuse of texts and parts of texts in the same text or as part of new textual contexts, conditions are created which cannot be explained with simple linearity of the use of language. The phenomenon of the texts in the text refers to dependencies and breaks in coherence, the marking of which is just as problematic as their contribution to the requirements for understanding the text and thus to the constitution of the text's meaning. Some languages have developed specific means which must be mandatorily used when the content of what has been communicated comes from a foreign source and not from one's own reflection. Since the need to mark the origin of the speaker’s knowledge seems to exist in all languages, these studies have also been extended to European languages in recent years. New possibilities for investigating the forms and functions of intertextuality also arise from the ease with which linguistic constructions can be found in corpora. These possibilities have not yet been developed for the analysis of multimodal language productions. Some considerations in this regard shall be presented
topic intertextuality
functions
intertextual paradigms
markers of intertextuality
url https://www.ojs.unito.it/index.php/ricognizioni/article/view/3639
work_keys_str_mv AT gerdahassler lapprocciolinguisticoallintertestualitaelasuaapplicabilitaallanalisiintermediale
_version_ 1717379909549031424