Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of teeth obturated using three different systems – AH plus/Gutta-percha, Resilon/Realseal self-etch, and Endofill/Gutta-percha: An in vitro study

Introduction: Endodontically treated teeth are more prone to fracture under masticatory forces. Resin-based dental materials have been proposed as a means to reinforce an endodontically treated tooth through the use of adhesive sealers in the root canal system. Aims: The objective of this study is t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G Ratna Velugu, P Karunakar, M S Ranga Reddy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Oral Research and Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jorr.org/article.asp?issn=2249-4987;year=2016;volume=8;issue=1;spage=1;epage=5;aulast=Velugu
id doaj-bc56ad8b33fb418d93f2c7cf4b494610
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bc56ad8b33fb418d93f2c7cf4b4946102020-11-25T00:09:27ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Oral Research and Review2249-49872394-25412016-01-01811510.4103/2249-4987.182485Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of teeth obturated using three different systems – AH plus/Gutta-percha, Resilon/Realseal self-etch, and Endofill/Gutta-percha: An in vitro studyG Ratna VeluguP KarunakarM S Ranga ReddyIntroduction: Endodontically treated teeth are more prone to fracture under masticatory forces. Resin-based dental materials have been proposed as a means to reinforce an endodontically treated tooth through the use of adhesive sealers in the root canal system. Aims: The objective of this study is to evaluate the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth obturated using lateral compaction technique with AH plus/Gutta-percha, Resilon/RealSeal self-etch (SE), and Endofill/Gutta-percha. Subjects and Methods: In this study, sixty, single-rooted mandibular premolars were used. The teeth chosen were de-coronated with a diamond disc and the root length was 14 mm for each specimen. All teeth were enlarged up to ISO size 30 master apical file using Ni–Ti rotary Protaper system and crown-down technique. Instrumented teeth were then randomly assigned into four experimental groups (n = 15) as follows: Group 1 - obturated with AH plus/Gutta-percha, Group 2 - obturated with Resilon/RealSeal SE, Group 3 - obturated with Endofill/Gutta-percha, and Group 4 - no obturation was done (control). The specimens were embedded into auto-polymerizing resin, later mounted in the universal testing machine and were subjected to load at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min until the root fractured. Statistical Analysis Used: ANOVA and Duncan post hoc analysis. Results: Results of this in vitro study showed that Resilon/RealSeal SE showed better fracture resistance of all the materials tested. Statistically significant difference between the groups (<0.001) was observed. Conclusions: Resilon/RealSeal SE demonstrated higher fracture resistance values than AH plus/Gutta-percha, followed by Endofill/Gutta-perchahttp://www.jorr.org/article.asp?issn=2249-4987;year=2016;volume=8;issue=1;spage=1;epage=5;aulast=VeluguAH plusEndofillfracture resistanceGutta-perchaResilonResilon/RealSeal self-etch
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author G Ratna Velugu
P Karunakar
M S Ranga Reddy
spellingShingle G Ratna Velugu
P Karunakar
M S Ranga Reddy
Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of teeth obturated using three different systems – AH plus/Gutta-percha, Resilon/Realseal self-etch, and Endofill/Gutta-percha: An in vitro study
Journal of Oral Research and Review
AH plus
Endofill
fracture resistance
Gutta-percha
Resilon
Resilon/RealSeal self-etch
author_facet G Ratna Velugu
P Karunakar
M S Ranga Reddy
author_sort G Ratna Velugu
title Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of teeth obturated using three different systems – AH plus/Gutta-percha, Resilon/Realseal self-etch, and Endofill/Gutta-percha: An in vitro study
title_short Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of teeth obturated using three different systems – AH plus/Gutta-percha, Resilon/Realseal self-etch, and Endofill/Gutta-percha: An in vitro study
title_full Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of teeth obturated using three different systems – AH plus/Gutta-percha, Resilon/Realseal self-etch, and Endofill/Gutta-percha: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of teeth obturated using three different systems – AH plus/Gutta-percha, Resilon/Realseal self-etch, and Endofill/Gutta-percha: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of teeth obturated using three different systems – AH plus/Gutta-percha, Resilon/Realseal self-etch, and Endofill/Gutta-percha: An in vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of teeth obturated using three different systems – ah plus/gutta-percha, resilon/realseal self-etch, and endofill/gutta-percha: an in vitro study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Oral Research and Review
issn 2249-4987
2394-2541
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Introduction: Endodontically treated teeth are more prone to fracture under masticatory forces. Resin-based dental materials have been proposed as a means to reinforce an endodontically treated tooth through the use of adhesive sealers in the root canal system. Aims: The objective of this study is to evaluate the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth obturated using lateral compaction technique with AH plus/Gutta-percha, Resilon/RealSeal self-etch (SE), and Endofill/Gutta-percha. Subjects and Methods: In this study, sixty, single-rooted mandibular premolars were used. The teeth chosen were de-coronated with a diamond disc and the root length was 14 mm for each specimen. All teeth were enlarged up to ISO size 30 master apical file using Ni–Ti rotary Protaper system and crown-down technique. Instrumented teeth were then randomly assigned into four experimental groups (n = 15) as follows: Group 1 - obturated with AH plus/Gutta-percha, Group 2 - obturated with Resilon/RealSeal SE, Group 3 - obturated with Endofill/Gutta-percha, and Group 4 - no obturation was done (control). The specimens were embedded into auto-polymerizing resin, later mounted in the universal testing machine and were subjected to load at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min until the root fractured. Statistical Analysis Used: ANOVA and Duncan post hoc analysis. Results: Results of this in vitro study showed that Resilon/RealSeal SE showed better fracture resistance of all the materials tested. Statistically significant difference between the groups (<0.001) was observed. Conclusions: Resilon/RealSeal SE demonstrated higher fracture resistance values than AH plus/Gutta-percha, followed by Endofill/Gutta-percha
topic AH plus
Endofill
fracture resistance
Gutta-percha
Resilon
Resilon/RealSeal self-etch
url http://www.jorr.org/article.asp?issn=2249-4987;year=2016;volume=8;issue=1;spage=1;epage=5;aulast=Velugu
work_keys_str_mv AT gratnavelugu comparativeevaluationoffractureresistanceofteethobturatedusingthreedifferentsystemsahplusguttapercharesilonrealsealselfetchandendofillguttaperchaaninvitrostudy
AT pkarunakar comparativeevaluationoffractureresistanceofteethobturatedusingthreedifferentsystemsahplusguttapercharesilonrealsealselfetchandendofillguttaperchaaninvitrostudy
AT msrangareddy comparativeevaluationoffractureresistanceofteethobturatedusingthreedifferentsystemsahplusguttapercharesilonrealsealselfetchandendofillguttaperchaaninvitrostudy
_version_ 1725411760893067264