A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape

Attempts have been made to examine how speakers frame linguistic varieties by employing social semiotic models. Using ethnographic data collected over many years, this article applies such a model to Iceland, once described as the ‘e-coli of linguistics’ – its size, historical isolation and relativ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stephen Pax Leonard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Tartu Press 2020-12-01
Series:Sign Systems Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/17087
id doaj-bc85e07116784d3a82380bf14060fb67
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bc85e07116784d3a82380bf14060fb672021-04-02T19:18:44ZengUniversity of Tartu PressSign Systems Studies1406-42431736-74092020-12-01482-410.12697/SSS.2020.48.2-4.05A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescapeStephen Pax Leonard0Moscow State Linguistic University, Ulitsa Ostozhenka 38, c1, Moscow 119034; Institute of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 3–1 Sadovaya Kudrinskaya St, Moscow 123432, Russia Attempts have been made to examine how speakers frame linguistic varieties by employing social semiotic models. Using ethnographic data collected over many years, this article applies such a model to Iceland, once described as the ‘e-coli of linguistics’ – its size, historical isolation and relative linguistic homogeneity create conditions akin to a sociolinguistic laboratory. This semiotic model of language ideologies problematizes the prevailing discourse of linguistic purism at a time of sociolinguistic upheaval. The analysis shows how an essentializing scheme at the heart of Icelandic language policy ensured that linguistic “anomalies” such as “dative disease” and “genitive phobia” indexed essential differences. “Impure” language was indicative of un-Icelandicness. Once monolingual (indeed monodialectal), the Icelandic speech community is increasingly characterized by innovative linguistic transgressions which thus far have not been instrumentalized by language policy makers. It is shown how a semiotic model can help us analyse the function of language ideologies more generally. https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/17087languageideologysemioticsIcelandicpurism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stephen Pax Leonard
spellingShingle Stephen Pax Leonard
A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape
Sign Systems Studies
language
ideology
semiotics
Icelandic
purism
author_facet Stephen Pax Leonard
author_sort Stephen Pax Leonard
title A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape
title_short A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape
title_full A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape
title_fullStr A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape
title_full_unstemmed A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape
title_sort semiotic approach to language ideologies: modelling the changing icelandic languagescape
publisher University of Tartu Press
series Sign Systems Studies
issn 1406-4243
1736-7409
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Attempts have been made to examine how speakers frame linguistic varieties by employing social semiotic models. Using ethnographic data collected over many years, this article applies such a model to Iceland, once described as the ‘e-coli of linguistics’ – its size, historical isolation and relative linguistic homogeneity create conditions akin to a sociolinguistic laboratory. This semiotic model of language ideologies problematizes the prevailing discourse of linguistic purism at a time of sociolinguistic upheaval. The analysis shows how an essentializing scheme at the heart of Icelandic language policy ensured that linguistic “anomalies” such as “dative disease” and “genitive phobia” indexed essential differences. “Impure” language was indicative of un-Icelandicness. Once monolingual (indeed monodialectal), the Icelandic speech community is increasingly characterized by innovative linguistic transgressions which thus far have not been instrumentalized by language policy makers. It is shown how a semiotic model can help us analyse the function of language ideologies more generally.
topic language
ideology
semiotics
Icelandic
purism
url https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/17087
work_keys_str_mv AT stephenpaxleonard asemioticapproachtolanguageideologiesmodellingthechangingicelandiclanguagescape
AT stephenpaxleonard semioticapproachtolanguageideologiesmodellingthechangingicelandiclanguagescape
_version_ 1721549313679556608