ON THE PROBLEM OF ONTOLOGY AND TERMINOLOGY OF STATUSORIENTED TYPES OF DISCOURSE IN MODERN LINGUISTIC DISCOUROLOGY

The article raises the problems of the status-oriented discourse typology. The essence of them lies in the fact that there exist several terminological nominations of such general type of the discourse, namely “institutional discourse”, “business discourse”, “expert discourse”, “specialized discours...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I. V. Chekulai, O. N. Prokhorova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MGIMO University Press 2019-05-01
Series:Дискурс профессиональной коммуникации
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.pdc-journal.com/jour/article/view/5
id doaj-bcd55dd429064d37a6b0c0a2e1181ccf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bcd55dd429064d37a6b0c0a2e1181ccf2021-09-30T15:40:14ZengMGIMO University PressДискурс профессиональной коммуникации2687-01262019-05-0111213510.24833/2687-0126-2019-1-1-21-354ON THE PROBLEM OF ONTOLOGY AND TERMINOLOGY OF STATUSORIENTED TYPES OF DISCOURSE IN MODERN LINGUISTIC DISCOUROLOGYI. V. Chekulai0O. N. Prokhorova1Belgorod State National Research UniversityBelgorod State National Research UniversityThe article raises the problems of the status-oriented discourse typology. The essence of them lies in the fact that there exist several terminological nominations of such general type of the discourse, namely “institutional discourse”, “business discourse”, “expert discourse”, “specialized discourse”, “professional discourse”. These terminological nominations often overlap giving the effect of vagueness of a certain term. The genre versatility of the texts pertaining to some discourse cluster of a specialized (i.e. involving certain special knowledge at least from the part of one of the discourse participants) character is such a case. More than that, we often meet the same authors using different terms from the list above. Still, the authors of the article consider these terms to denote different essences differentiating not only from the nominative point of view, but ontologically as well. First, they are sure to denote hierarchically different levels of the status-oriented discourse. Second, they are sure to present peculiar to a certain types of a discourse categorical status of the communicants. Third, the coordination of oral and written discourse genres is bound to be peculiar to a certain kind of the discourse. All these considerations predetermine the common efforts of linguists to conduct systemic research of the problem.https://www.pdc-journal.com/jour/article/view/5status-oriented discourseinstitutional discoursebusiness discourseexpert discoursespecial discourseprofessional discourse
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author I. V. Chekulai
O. N. Prokhorova
spellingShingle I. V. Chekulai
O. N. Prokhorova
ON THE PROBLEM OF ONTOLOGY AND TERMINOLOGY OF STATUSORIENTED TYPES OF DISCOURSE IN MODERN LINGUISTIC DISCOUROLOGY
Дискурс профессиональной коммуникации
status-oriented discourse
institutional discourse
business discourse
expert discourse
special discourse
professional discourse
author_facet I. V. Chekulai
O. N. Prokhorova
author_sort I. V. Chekulai
title ON THE PROBLEM OF ONTOLOGY AND TERMINOLOGY OF STATUSORIENTED TYPES OF DISCOURSE IN MODERN LINGUISTIC DISCOUROLOGY
title_short ON THE PROBLEM OF ONTOLOGY AND TERMINOLOGY OF STATUSORIENTED TYPES OF DISCOURSE IN MODERN LINGUISTIC DISCOUROLOGY
title_full ON THE PROBLEM OF ONTOLOGY AND TERMINOLOGY OF STATUSORIENTED TYPES OF DISCOURSE IN MODERN LINGUISTIC DISCOUROLOGY
title_fullStr ON THE PROBLEM OF ONTOLOGY AND TERMINOLOGY OF STATUSORIENTED TYPES OF DISCOURSE IN MODERN LINGUISTIC DISCOUROLOGY
title_full_unstemmed ON THE PROBLEM OF ONTOLOGY AND TERMINOLOGY OF STATUSORIENTED TYPES OF DISCOURSE IN MODERN LINGUISTIC DISCOUROLOGY
title_sort on the problem of ontology and terminology of statusoriented types of discourse in modern linguistic discourology
publisher MGIMO University Press
series Дискурс профессиональной коммуникации
issn 2687-0126
publishDate 2019-05-01
description The article raises the problems of the status-oriented discourse typology. The essence of them lies in the fact that there exist several terminological nominations of such general type of the discourse, namely “institutional discourse”, “business discourse”, “expert discourse”, “specialized discourse”, “professional discourse”. These terminological nominations often overlap giving the effect of vagueness of a certain term. The genre versatility of the texts pertaining to some discourse cluster of a specialized (i.e. involving certain special knowledge at least from the part of one of the discourse participants) character is such a case. More than that, we often meet the same authors using different terms from the list above. Still, the authors of the article consider these terms to denote different essences differentiating not only from the nominative point of view, but ontologically as well. First, they are sure to denote hierarchically different levels of the status-oriented discourse. Second, they are sure to present peculiar to a certain types of a discourse categorical status of the communicants. Third, the coordination of oral and written discourse genres is bound to be peculiar to a certain kind of the discourse. All these considerations predetermine the common efforts of linguists to conduct systemic research of the problem.
topic status-oriented discourse
institutional discourse
business discourse
expert discourse
special discourse
professional discourse
url https://www.pdc-journal.com/jour/article/view/5
work_keys_str_mv AT ivchekulai ontheproblemofontologyandterminologyofstatusorientedtypesofdiscourseinmodernlinguisticdiscourology
AT onprokhorova ontheproblemofontologyandterminologyofstatusorientedtypesofdiscourseinmodernlinguisticdiscourology
_version_ 1716862962541527040