Influence of sugammadex versus neostigmine for neuromuscular block reversal on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract Background The influence of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular block (NMB) on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), compared with neostigmine, remains to be determined. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the incidence of PPCs between...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jia-Feng Wang, Zhen-Zhen Zhao, Zheng-Yu Jiang, Hui-Xing Liu, Xiao-Ming Deng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-09-01
Series:Perioperative Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-021-00203-6
id doaj-bd036edf0ac340c0949c7e36d7a06344
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bd036edf0ac340c0949c7e36d7a063442021-09-26T11:50:26ZengBMCPerioperative Medicine2047-05252021-09-0110111110.1186/s13741-021-00203-6Influence of sugammadex versus neostigmine for neuromuscular block reversal on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsJia-Feng Wang0Zhen-Zhen ZhaoZheng-Yu Jiang1Hui-Xing Liu2Xiao-Ming Deng3Faculty of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical UniversityFaculty of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical UniversityDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking University People’s HospitalFaculty of Anesthesiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical UniversityAbstract Background The influence of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular block (NMB) on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), compared with neostigmine, remains to be determined. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the incidence of PPCs between patients who received sugammadex versus neostigmine. Methods Relevant studies were obtained by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. A random effects model incorporating the potential heterogeneity was used to pool the results. Results Fourteen RCTs including 1478 adult patients who underwent surgeries with general anesthesia were included, and of these, 753 received sugammadex and 725 received neostigmine for reversal of NMB. The pooled results showed that sugammadex was associated with a lower risk of overall PPCs compared to neostigmine (odds ratio [OR]: 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43–0.89, p = 0.01; I 2 = 0%). This finding remained consistent after exclusion of two studies with potential overlapping events (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36–0.96, p = 0.03; I 2=9%). Stratified analyses according to the categories of PPCs showed that sugammadex was associated with a significantly lower risk of postoperative respiratory failure (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.38–0.97, p = 0.04; I 2 = 0%) but not of postoperative pulmonary infection (OR: 0.79, p = 0.71), atelectasis (OR: 0.78, p = 0.33), or pneumothorax (OR: 0.87, p = 0.79). Conclusions Compared with neostigmine, the use of sugammadex for reversal of NMB was associated with a lower risk of PPCs, mainly due to a lower incidence of postoperative respiratory failure with the use of sugammadex.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-021-00203-6Neuromuscular blockPostoperative pulmonary complicationsSugammadexNeostigmineMeta-analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jia-Feng Wang
Zhen-Zhen Zhao
Zheng-Yu Jiang
Hui-Xing Liu
Xiao-Ming Deng
spellingShingle Jia-Feng Wang
Zhen-Zhen Zhao
Zheng-Yu Jiang
Hui-Xing Liu
Xiao-Ming Deng
Influence of sugammadex versus neostigmine for neuromuscular block reversal on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Perioperative Medicine
Neuromuscular block
Postoperative pulmonary complications
Sugammadex
Neostigmine
Meta-analysis
author_facet Jia-Feng Wang
Zhen-Zhen Zhao
Zheng-Yu Jiang
Hui-Xing Liu
Xiao-Ming Deng
author_sort Jia-Feng Wang
title Influence of sugammadex versus neostigmine for neuromuscular block reversal on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Influence of sugammadex versus neostigmine for neuromuscular block reversal on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Influence of sugammadex versus neostigmine for neuromuscular block reversal on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Influence of sugammadex versus neostigmine for neuromuscular block reversal on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Influence of sugammadex versus neostigmine for neuromuscular block reversal on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort influence of sugammadex versus neostigmine for neuromuscular block reversal on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
publisher BMC
series Perioperative Medicine
issn 2047-0525
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Abstract Background The influence of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular block (NMB) on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), compared with neostigmine, remains to be determined. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the incidence of PPCs between patients who received sugammadex versus neostigmine. Methods Relevant studies were obtained by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. A random effects model incorporating the potential heterogeneity was used to pool the results. Results Fourteen RCTs including 1478 adult patients who underwent surgeries with general anesthesia were included, and of these, 753 received sugammadex and 725 received neostigmine for reversal of NMB. The pooled results showed that sugammadex was associated with a lower risk of overall PPCs compared to neostigmine (odds ratio [OR]: 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43–0.89, p = 0.01; I 2 = 0%). This finding remained consistent after exclusion of two studies with potential overlapping events (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36–0.96, p = 0.03; I 2=9%). Stratified analyses according to the categories of PPCs showed that sugammadex was associated with a significantly lower risk of postoperative respiratory failure (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.38–0.97, p = 0.04; I 2 = 0%) but not of postoperative pulmonary infection (OR: 0.79, p = 0.71), atelectasis (OR: 0.78, p = 0.33), or pneumothorax (OR: 0.87, p = 0.79). Conclusions Compared with neostigmine, the use of sugammadex for reversal of NMB was associated with a lower risk of PPCs, mainly due to a lower incidence of postoperative respiratory failure with the use of sugammadex.
topic Neuromuscular block
Postoperative pulmonary complications
Sugammadex
Neostigmine
Meta-analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-021-00203-6
work_keys_str_mv AT jiafengwang influenceofsugammadexversusneostigmineforneuromuscularblockreversalontheincidenceofpostoperativepulmonarycomplicationsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhenzhenzhao influenceofsugammadexversusneostigmineforneuromuscularblockreversalontheincidenceofpostoperativepulmonarycomplicationsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhengyujiang influenceofsugammadexversusneostigmineforneuromuscularblockreversalontheincidenceofpostoperativepulmonarycomplicationsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT huixingliu influenceofsugammadexversusneostigmineforneuromuscularblockreversalontheincidenceofpostoperativepulmonarycomplicationsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiaomingdeng influenceofsugammadexversusneostigmineforneuromuscularblockreversalontheincidenceofpostoperativepulmonarycomplicationsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1716867729892311040