Doctor-patient communication with people with intellectual disability - a qualitative study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>People with intellectual disability (ID) expressed dissatisfaction with doctor-patient communication and mentioned certain preferences for this communication (our research). Since many people with ID in the Netherlands have recently...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Metsemakers Job FM, van Schrojenstein Lantman - de Valk Henny MJ, Veldhuijzen Wemke, Wullink Magda, Dinant Geert-Jan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-12-01
Series:BMC Family Practice
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/10/82
id doaj-bd0891f6955145778cb02147327ca03d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bd0891f6955145778cb02147327ca03d2020-11-25T03:55:12ZengBMCBMC Family Practice1471-22962009-12-011018210.1186/1471-2296-10-82Doctor-patient communication with people with intellectual disability - a qualitative studyMetsemakers Job FMvan Schrojenstein Lantman - de Valk Henny MJVeldhuijzen WemkeWullink MagdaDinant Geert-Jan<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>People with intellectual disability (ID) expressed dissatisfaction with doctor-patient communication and mentioned certain preferences for this communication (our research). Since many people with ID in the Netherlands have recently moved from residential care facilities to supported accommodations in the community, medical care for them was transferred from ID physicians (IDPs) to general practitioners (GPs) in the vicinity of the new accommodation. We addressed the following research question: 'What are the similarities and differences between the communication preferences of people with ID and the professional criteria for doctor-patient communication by GPs?'</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A focus group meeting and interviews were used to identify the preferences of 12 persons with ID for good communication with their GP; these were compared with communication criteria used to assess trainee GPs, as described in the MAAS-Global manual.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Eight preferences for doctor-patient communication were formulated by the people with ID. Six of them matched the criteria used for GPs. Improvements are required as regards the time available for consultation, demonstrating physical examinations before applying them and triadic communication.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>People with ID hold strong views on communication with their doctors during consultations. GPs, people with ID and their support workers can further fine-tune their communication skills.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/10/82
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Metsemakers Job FM
van Schrojenstein Lantman - de Valk Henny MJ
Veldhuijzen Wemke
Wullink Magda
Dinant Geert-Jan
spellingShingle Metsemakers Job FM
van Schrojenstein Lantman - de Valk Henny MJ
Veldhuijzen Wemke
Wullink Magda
Dinant Geert-Jan
Doctor-patient communication with people with intellectual disability - a qualitative study
BMC Family Practice
author_facet Metsemakers Job FM
van Schrojenstein Lantman - de Valk Henny MJ
Veldhuijzen Wemke
Wullink Magda
Dinant Geert-Jan
author_sort Metsemakers Job FM
title Doctor-patient communication with people with intellectual disability - a qualitative study
title_short Doctor-patient communication with people with intellectual disability - a qualitative study
title_full Doctor-patient communication with people with intellectual disability - a qualitative study
title_fullStr Doctor-patient communication with people with intellectual disability - a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Doctor-patient communication with people with intellectual disability - a qualitative study
title_sort doctor-patient communication with people with intellectual disability - a qualitative study
publisher BMC
series BMC Family Practice
issn 1471-2296
publishDate 2009-12-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>People with intellectual disability (ID) expressed dissatisfaction with doctor-patient communication and mentioned certain preferences for this communication (our research). Since many people with ID in the Netherlands have recently moved from residential care facilities to supported accommodations in the community, medical care for them was transferred from ID physicians (IDPs) to general practitioners (GPs) in the vicinity of the new accommodation. We addressed the following research question: 'What are the similarities and differences between the communication preferences of people with ID and the professional criteria for doctor-patient communication by GPs?'</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A focus group meeting and interviews were used to identify the preferences of 12 persons with ID for good communication with their GP; these were compared with communication criteria used to assess trainee GPs, as described in the MAAS-Global manual.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Eight preferences for doctor-patient communication were formulated by the people with ID. Six of them matched the criteria used for GPs. Improvements are required as regards the time available for consultation, demonstrating physical examinations before applying them and triadic communication.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>People with ID hold strong views on communication with their doctors during consultations. GPs, people with ID and their support workers can further fine-tune their communication skills.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/10/82
work_keys_str_mv AT metsemakersjobfm doctorpatientcommunicationwithpeoplewithintellectualdisabilityaqualitativestudy
AT vanschrojensteinlantmandevalkhennymj doctorpatientcommunicationwithpeoplewithintellectualdisabilityaqualitativestudy
AT veldhuijzenwemke doctorpatientcommunicationwithpeoplewithintellectualdisabilityaqualitativestudy
AT wullinkmagda doctorpatientcommunicationwithpeoplewithintellectualdisabilityaqualitativestudy
AT dinantgeertjan doctorpatientcommunicationwithpeoplewithintellectualdisabilityaqualitativestudy
_version_ 1724470071770742784