Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract Background Previous randomized controlled trials (RCT)s showed similar outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) treated with anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD) compared to rate control therapy. We sought to evaluate whether cathete...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed AlTurki, Riccardo Proietti, Ahmed Dawas, Hasan Alturki, Thao Huynh, Vidal Essebag
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-01-01
Series:BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12872-019-0998-2
id doaj-bd2dcf0e2bd6406fa332e4f4ff8c7f3a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bd2dcf0e2bd6406fa332e4f4ff8c7f3a2020-11-25T03:26:57ZengBMCBMC Cardiovascular Disorders1471-22612019-01-0119111310.1186/s12872-019-0998-2Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsAhmed AlTurki0Riccardo Proietti1Ahmed Dawas2Hasan Alturki3Thao Huynh4Vidal Essebag5Division of Cardiology, McGill University Health CenterDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular SciencesDivision of Cardiology, McGill University Health CenterSchool of Medicine and Medical Science, University CollegeDivision of Cardiology, McGill University Health CenterDivision of Cardiology, McGill University Health CenterAbstract Background Previous randomized controlled trials (RCT)s showed similar outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) treated with anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD) compared to rate control therapy. We sought to evaluate whether catheter ablation is superior to medical therapy in patients with AF and HFrEF. Methods We searched electronic databases for all RCTs that compared catheter ablation and medical therapy (with or without use of AAD). We used random-effects models to summarize the studies. The primary end-point was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included heart failure-related hospitalizations and change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Results We retrieved and summarized 7 randomized controlled trials, enrolling 856 patients (429 in the catheter ablation arm and 427 in the medical therapy arm). Compared with medical therapy (including use of AAD), AF catheter ablation was associated with a significant reduction in mortality (risk ratio 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34 to 0.74; P = 0.0005) and heart failure-related hospitalizations (risk ratio 0.56; 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.71; P < 0.0001). Furthermore, catheter ablation led to significant improvements in LVEF (weighted mean difference, 7.48; 95% CI: 3.71 to 11.26; P < 0.0001). Conclusions Compared to medical therapy, including use of AAD, catheter ablation for AF was associated with a significant reduction in mortality and heart failure-related hospitalizations as well as an improvement in LVEF in patients with HFrEF. Larger trials are needed to confirm whether rhythm control with ablation is superior to rate control in patients with AF and heart failure.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12872-019-0998-2Catheter ablationAtrial fibrillationHeart failure
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ahmed AlTurki
Riccardo Proietti
Ahmed Dawas
Hasan Alturki
Thao Huynh
Vidal Essebag
spellingShingle Ahmed AlTurki
Riccardo Proietti
Ahmed Dawas
Hasan Alturki
Thao Huynh
Vidal Essebag
Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Catheter ablation
Atrial fibrillation
Heart failure
author_facet Ahmed AlTurki
Riccardo Proietti
Ahmed Dawas
Hasan Alturki
Thao Huynh
Vidal Essebag
author_sort Ahmed AlTurki
title Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
publisher BMC
series BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
issn 1471-2261
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Abstract Background Previous randomized controlled trials (RCT)s showed similar outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) treated with anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD) compared to rate control therapy. We sought to evaluate whether catheter ablation is superior to medical therapy in patients with AF and HFrEF. Methods We searched electronic databases for all RCTs that compared catheter ablation and medical therapy (with or without use of AAD). We used random-effects models to summarize the studies. The primary end-point was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included heart failure-related hospitalizations and change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Results We retrieved and summarized 7 randomized controlled trials, enrolling 856 patients (429 in the catheter ablation arm and 427 in the medical therapy arm). Compared with medical therapy (including use of AAD), AF catheter ablation was associated with a significant reduction in mortality (risk ratio 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34 to 0.74; P = 0.0005) and heart failure-related hospitalizations (risk ratio 0.56; 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.71; P < 0.0001). Furthermore, catheter ablation led to significant improvements in LVEF (weighted mean difference, 7.48; 95% CI: 3.71 to 11.26; P < 0.0001). Conclusions Compared to medical therapy, including use of AAD, catheter ablation for AF was associated with a significant reduction in mortality and heart failure-related hospitalizations as well as an improvement in LVEF in patients with HFrEF. Larger trials are needed to confirm whether rhythm control with ablation is superior to rate control in patients with AF and heart failure.
topic Catheter ablation
Atrial fibrillation
Heart failure
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12872-019-0998-2
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedalturki catheterablationforatrialfibrillationinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT riccardoproietti catheterablationforatrialfibrillationinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT ahmeddawas catheterablationforatrialfibrillationinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT hasanalturki catheterablationforatrialfibrillationinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT thaohuynh catheterablationforatrialfibrillationinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT vidalessebag catheterablationforatrialfibrillationinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1724590341631246336