Is Bigger Better? Living Donor Kidney Volume as Measured by the Donor CT Angiogram in Predicting Donor and Recipient eGFR after Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

Background. The role of kidney volume measurement in predicting the donor and recipient kidney function is not clear. Methods. We measured kidney volume bilaterally in living kidney donors using CT angiography and assessed the association with the donor remaining kidney and recipient kidney (donated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chaudhry Adeel Ebad, David Brennan, Julio Chevarria, Mohammad Bin Hussein, Donal Sexton, Douglas Mulholland, Ciaran Doyle, Patrick O’Kelly, Yvonne Williams, Ruth Dunne, Conall O’Seaghdha, Dilly Little, Martina Morrin, Peter J. Conlon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Transplantation
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8885354
id doaj-bd4d70decff04e639ab20df944278e9e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bd4d70decff04e639ab20df944278e9e2021-07-19T01:05:04ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Transplantation2090-00152021-01-01202110.1155/2021/8885354Is Bigger Better? Living Donor Kidney Volume as Measured by the Donor CT Angiogram in Predicting Donor and Recipient eGFR after Living Donor Kidney TransplantationChaudhry Adeel Ebad0David Brennan1Julio Chevarria2Mohammad Bin Hussein3Donal Sexton4Douglas Mulholland5Ciaran Doyle6Patrick O’Kelly7Yvonne Williams8Ruth Dunne9Conall O’Seaghdha10Dilly Little11Martina Morrin12Peter J. Conlon13Department of Nephrology and Kidney TransplantationDepartment of RadiologyDepartment of Nephrology and Kidney TransplantationDepartment of Nephrology and Kidney TransplantationDepartment of Nephrology and Kidney TransplantationDepartment of RadiologyDepartment of Nephrology and Kidney TransplantationDepartment of Nephrology and Kidney TransplantationDepartment of Nephrology and Kidney TransplantationDepartment of RadiologyDepartment of Nephrology and Kidney TransplantationDepartment of Urology and Kidney TransplantationDepartment of RadiologyDepartment of Nephrology and Kidney TransplantationBackground. The role of kidney volume measurement in predicting the donor and recipient kidney function is not clear. Methods. We measured kidney volume bilaterally in living kidney donors using CT angiography and assessed the association with the donor remaining kidney and recipient kidney (donated kidney) function at 1 year after kidney transplantation. Donor volume was categorized into tertiles based on lowest, middle, and highest volume. Results. There were 166 living donor and recipient pairs. The mean donor age was 44.8 years (SD ± 10.8), and donor mean BMI was 25.5 (SD ± 2.9). The recipients of living donor kidneys were 64% male and had a mean age of 43.5 years (SD ± 13.3). Six percent of patients experienced an episode of cellular rejection and were maintained on dialysis for a mean of 18 months (13–32) prior to transplant. Kidney volume was divided into tertiles based on lowest, middle, and highest volume. Kidney volume median (range) in tertiles 1, 2, and 3 was 124 (89–135 ml), 155 (136–164 ml), and 184 (165–240 ml) with donor eGFR ml/min (adjusted for body surface area expressed as ml/min/1.73 m2) at the time of donation in each tertile, 109 (93–129), 110 (92–132), and 101 ml/min (84–117). The median (IQR) eGFR in tertiles 1 to 3 in kidney recipients at 1 year after donation was 54 (44–67), 62 (50–75), and 63 ml/min (58–79), respectively. The median (IQR) eGFR in tertiles 1 to 3 in the remaining kidney of donors at 1 year after donation was 59 (53–66), 65 (57–72), and 65 ml/min (56–73), respectively. Conclusion. Bigger kidney volume was associated with better eGFR at 1 year after transplant in the recipient and marginally in the donor remaining kidney.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8885354
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chaudhry Adeel Ebad
David Brennan
Julio Chevarria
Mohammad Bin Hussein
Donal Sexton
Douglas Mulholland
Ciaran Doyle
Patrick O’Kelly
Yvonne Williams
Ruth Dunne
Conall O’Seaghdha
Dilly Little
Martina Morrin
Peter J. Conlon
spellingShingle Chaudhry Adeel Ebad
David Brennan
Julio Chevarria
Mohammad Bin Hussein
Donal Sexton
Douglas Mulholland
Ciaran Doyle
Patrick O’Kelly
Yvonne Williams
Ruth Dunne
Conall O’Seaghdha
Dilly Little
Martina Morrin
Peter J. Conlon
Is Bigger Better? Living Donor Kidney Volume as Measured by the Donor CT Angiogram in Predicting Donor and Recipient eGFR after Living Donor Kidney Transplantation
Journal of Transplantation
author_facet Chaudhry Adeel Ebad
David Brennan
Julio Chevarria
Mohammad Bin Hussein
Donal Sexton
Douglas Mulholland
Ciaran Doyle
Patrick O’Kelly
Yvonne Williams
Ruth Dunne
Conall O’Seaghdha
Dilly Little
Martina Morrin
Peter J. Conlon
author_sort Chaudhry Adeel Ebad
title Is Bigger Better? Living Donor Kidney Volume as Measured by the Donor CT Angiogram in Predicting Donor and Recipient eGFR after Living Donor Kidney Transplantation
title_short Is Bigger Better? Living Donor Kidney Volume as Measured by the Donor CT Angiogram in Predicting Donor and Recipient eGFR after Living Donor Kidney Transplantation
title_full Is Bigger Better? Living Donor Kidney Volume as Measured by the Donor CT Angiogram in Predicting Donor and Recipient eGFR after Living Donor Kidney Transplantation
title_fullStr Is Bigger Better? Living Donor Kidney Volume as Measured by the Donor CT Angiogram in Predicting Donor and Recipient eGFR after Living Donor Kidney Transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Is Bigger Better? Living Donor Kidney Volume as Measured by the Donor CT Angiogram in Predicting Donor and Recipient eGFR after Living Donor Kidney Transplantation
title_sort is bigger better? living donor kidney volume as measured by the donor ct angiogram in predicting donor and recipient egfr after living donor kidney transplantation
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Transplantation
issn 2090-0015
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Background. The role of kidney volume measurement in predicting the donor and recipient kidney function is not clear. Methods. We measured kidney volume bilaterally in living kidney donors using CT angiography and assessed the association with the donor remaining kidney and recipient kidney (donated kidney) function at 1 year after kidney transplantation. Donor volume was categorized into tertiles based on lowest, middle, and highest volume. Results. There were 166 living donor and recipient pairs. The mean donor age was 44.8 years (SD ± 10.8), and donor mean BMI was 25.5 (SD ± 2.9). The recipients of living donor kidneys were 64% male and had a mean age of 43.5 years (SD ± 13.3). Six percent of patients experienced an episode of cellular rejection and were maintained on dialysis for a mean of 18 months (13–32) prior to transplant. Kidney volume was divided into tertiles based on lowest, middle, and highest volume. Kidney volume median (range) in tertiles 1, 2, and 3 was 124 (89–135 ml), 155 (136–164 ml), and 184 (165–240 ml) with donor eGFR ml/min (adjusted for body surface area expressed as ml/min/1.73 m2) at the time of donation in each tertile, 109 (93–129), 110 (92–132), and 101 ml/min (84–117). The median (IQR) eGFR in tertiles 1 to 3 in kidney recipients at 1 year after donation was 54 (44–67), 62 (50–75), and 63 ml/min (58–79), respectively. The median (IQR) eGFR in tertiles 1 to 3 in the remaining kidney of donors at 1 year after donation was 59 (53–66), 65 (57–72), and 65 ml/min (56–73), respectively. Conclusion. Bigger kidney volume was associated with better eGFR at 1 year after transplant in the recipient and marginally in the donor remaining kidney.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8885354
work_keys_str_mv AT chaudhryadeelebad isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation
AT davidbrennan isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation
AT juliochevarria isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation
AT mohammadbinhussein isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation
AT donalsexton isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation
AT douglasmulholland isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation
AT ciarandoyle isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation
AT patrickokelly isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation
AT yvonnewilliams isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation
AT ruthdunne isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation
AT conalloseaghdha isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation
AT dillylittle isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation
AT martinamorrin isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation
AT peterjconlon isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation
_version_ 1721295473830002688