Shakespeare and Middleton’s Co-Authorship of <em>Timon of Athens</em>

The essay focuses on Shakespeare’s collaboration with Thomas Middleton on Timon of Athens (1605-1606). It provides new evidence concerning the patterns of imagery in the play and argues that these support the authorial divisions established by earlier attribution studies. Beyond the issue of ‘who wr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eilidh Kane
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Firenze University Press 2016-03-01
Series:Journal of Early Modern Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-jems/article/view/7061
id doaj-bd682bd7536a4a609a44d3a06f83c66e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bd682bd7536a4a609a44d3a06f83c66e2020-11-25T03:41:54ZengFirenze University PressJournal of Early Modern Studies2279-71492016-03-01510.13128/JEMS-2279-7149-1809015127Shakespeare and Middleton’s Co-Authorship of <em>Timon of Athens</em>Eilidh Kane0Laboratorio editoriale OA / Dip. LILSIThe essay focuses on Shakespeare’s collaboration with Thomas Middleton on Timon of Athens (1605-1606). It provides new evidence concerning the patterns of imagery in the play and argues that these support the authorial divisions established by earlier attribution studies. Beyond the issue of ‘who wrote what’ are questions about how Shakespeare co-wrote with Middleton. Previous analysis of the play has suggested that Timon was co-written consecutively, Shakespeare first, Middleton second. However, it is argued here that a mixture of consecutive and simultaneous co-writing would better explain the play as it stands. In the course of making the case, the essay reasserts the value of attribution evidence to the study of collaboration. Middleton’s skill in writing cynical urban scenes for his city comedies is often cited as the reason why he and Shakespeare worked together on Timon; and it is argued that Middleton’s early pamphlets should also be considered as evidence of his ability to satirise greed, and therefore as a reason why he was valuable to Shakespeare as a collaborator. https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-jems/article/view/7061AttributionCollaborationMiddletonShakespeare
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eilidh Kane
spellingShingle Eilidh Kane
Shakespeare and Middleton’s Co-Authorship of <em>Timon of Athens</em>
Journal of Early Modern Studies
Attribution
Collaboration
Middleton
Shakespeare
author_facet Eilidh Kane
author_sort Eilidh Kane
title Shakespeare and Middleton’s Co-Authorship of <em>Timon of Athens</em>
title_short Shakespeare and Middleton’s Co-Authorship of <em>Timon of Athens</em>
title_full Shakespeare and Middleton’s Co-Authorship of <em>Timon of Athens</em>
title_fullStr Shakespeare and Middleton’s Co-Authorship of <em>Timon of Athens</em>
title_full_unstemmed Shakespeare and Middleton’s Co-Authorship of <em>Timon of Athens</em>
title_sort shakespeare and middleton’s co-authorship of <em>timon of athens</em>
publisher Firenze University Press
series Journal of Early Modern Studies
issn 2279-7149
publishDate 2016-03-01
description The essay focuses on Shakespeare’s collaboration with Thomas Middleton on Timon of Athens (1605-1606). It provides new evidence concerning the patterns of imagery in the play and argues that these support the authorial divisions established by earlier attribution studies. Beyond the issue of ‘who wrote what’ are questions about how Shakespeare co-wrote with Middleton. Previous analysis of the play has suggested that Timon was co-written consecutively, Shakespeare first, Middleton second. However, it is argued here that a mixture of consecutive and simultaneous co-writing would better explain the play as it stands. In the course of making the case, the essay reasserts the value of attribution evidence to the study of collaboration. Middleton’s skill in writing cynical urban scenes for his city comedies is often cited as the reason why he and Shakespeare worked together on Timon; and it is argued that Middleton’s early pamphlets should also be considered as evidence of his ability to satirise greed, and therefore as a reason why he was valuable to Shakespeare as a collaborator.
topic Attribution
Collaboration
Middleton
Shakespeare
url https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/bsfm-jems/article/view/7061
work_keys_str_mv AT eilidhkane shakespeareandmiddletonscoauthorshipofemtimonofathensem
_version_ 1724527477690204160