Sampling for global epidemic models and the topology of an international airport network.
Mathematical models that describe the global spread of infectious diseases such as influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and tuberculosis (TB) often consider a sample of international airports as a network supporting disease spread. However, there is no consensus on how many cities sh...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2008-09-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2522280?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-bd69c400b2b8468ab2b5c8419e653fd2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bd69c400b2b8468ab2b5c8419e653fd22020-11-24T21:36:43ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032008-09-0139e315410.1371/journal.pone.0003154Sampling for global epidemic models and the topology of an international airport network.Georgiy BobashevRobert J MorrisD Michael GoedeckeMathematical models that describe the global spread of infectious diseases such as influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and tuberculosis (TB) often consider a sample of international airports as a network supporting disease spread. However, there is no consensus on how many cities should be selected or on how to select those cities. Using airport flight data that commercial airlines reported to the Official Airline Guide (OAG) in 2000, we have examined the network characteristics of network samples obtained under different selection rules. In addition, we have examined different size samples based on largest flight volume and largest metropolitan populations. We have shown that although the bias in network characteristics increases with the reduction of the sample size, a relatively small number of areas that includes the largest airports, the largest cities, the most-connected cities, and the most central cities is enough to describe the dynamics of the global spread of influenza. The analysis suggests that a relatively small number of cities (around 200 or 300 out of almost 3000) can capture enough network information to adequately describe the global spread of a disease such as influenza. Weak traffic flows between small airports can contribute to noise and mask other means of spread such as the ground transportation.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2522280?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Georgiy Bobashev Robert J Morris D Michael Goedecke |
spellingShingle |
Georgiy Bobashev Robert J Morris D Michael Goedecke Sampling for global epidemic models and the topology of an international airport network. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Georgiy Bobashev Robert J Morris D Michael Goedecke |
author_sort |
Georgiy Bobashev |
title |
Sampling for global epidemic models and the topology of an international airport network. |
title_short |
Sampling for global epidemic models and the topology of an international airport network. |
title_full |
Sampling for global epidemic models and the topology of an international airport network. |
title_fullStr |
Sampling for global epidemic models and the topology of an international airport network. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sampling for global epidemic models and the topology of an international airport network. |
title_sort |
sampling for global epidemic models and the topology of an international airport network. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2008-09-01 |
description |
Mathematical models that describe the global spread of infectious diseases such as influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and tuberculosis (TB) often consider a sample of international airports as a network supporting disease spread. However, there is no consensus on how many cities should be selected or on how to select those cities. Using airport flight data that commercial airlines reported to the Official Airline Guide (OAG) in 2000, we have examined the network characteristics of network samples obtained under different selection rules. In addition, we have examined different size samples based on largest flight volume and largest metropolitan populations. We have shown that although the bias in network characteristics increases with the reduction of the sample size, a relatively small number of areas that includes the largest airports, the largest cities, the most-connected cities, and the most central cities is enough to describe the dynamics of the global spread of influenza. The analysis suggests that a relatively small number of cities (around 200 or 300 out of almost 3000) can capture enough network information to adequately describe the global spread of a disease such as influenza. Weak traffic flows between small airports can contribute to noise and mask other means of spread such as the ground transportation. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2522280?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT georgiybobashev samplingforglobalepidemicmodelsandthetopologyofaninternationalairportnetwork AT robertjmorris samplingforglobalepidemicmodelsandthetopologyofaninternationalairportnetwork AT dmichaelgoedecke samplingforglobalepidemicmodelsandthetopologyofaninternationalairportnetwork |
_version_ |
1725939747014049792 |