Sampling for global epidemic models and the topology of an international airport network.

Mathematical models that describe the global spread of infectious diseases such as influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and tuberculosis (TB) often consider a sample of international airports as a network supporting disease spread. However, there is no consensus on how many cities sh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Georgiy Bobashev, Robert J Morris, D Michael Goedecke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2008-09-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2522280?pdf=render
id doaj-bd69c400b2b8468ab2b5c8419e653fd2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bd69c400b2b8468ab2b5c8419e653fd22020-11-24T21:36:43ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032008-09-0139e315410.1371/journal.pone.0003154Sampling for global epidemic models and the topology of an international airport network.Georgiy BobashevRobert J MorrisD Michael GoedeckeMathematical models that describe the global spread of infectious diseases such as influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and tuberculosis (TB) often consider a sample of international airports as a network supporting disease spread. However, there is no consensus on how many cities should be selected or on how to select those cities. Using airport flight data that commercial airlines reported to the Official Airline Guide (OAG) in 2000, we have examined the network characteristics of network samples obtained under different selection rules. In addition, we have examined different size samples based on largest flight volume and largest metropolitan populations. We have shown that although the bias in network characteristics increases with the reduction of the sample size, a relatively small number of areas that includes the largest airports, the largest cities, the most-connected cities, and the most central cities is enough to describe the dynamics of the global spread of influenza. The analysis suggests that a relatively small number of cities (around 200 or 300 out of almost 3000) can capture enough network information to adequately describe the global spread of a disease such as influenza. Weak traffic flows between small airports can contribute to noise and mask other means of spread such as the ground transportation.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2522280?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Georgiy Bobashev
Robert J Morris
D Michael Goedecke
spellingShingle Georgiy Bobashev
Robert J Morris
D Michael Goedecke
Sampling for global epidemic models and the topology of an international airport network.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Georgiy Bobashev
Robert J Morris
D Michael Goedecke
author_sort Georgiy Bobashev
title Sampling for global epidemic models and the topology of an international airport network.
title_short Sampling for global epidemic models and the topology of an international airport network.
title_full Sampling for global epidemic models and the topology of an international airport network.
title_fullStr Sampling for global epidemic models and the topology of an international airport network.
title_full_unstemmed Sampling for global epidemic models and the topology of an international airport network.
title_sort sampling for global epidemic models and the topology of an international airport network.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2008-09-01
description Mathematical models that describe the global spread of infectious diseases such as influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and tuberculosis (TB) often consider a sample of international airports as a network supporting disease spread. However, there is no consensus on how many cities should be selected or on how to select those cities. Using airport flight data that commercial airlines reported to the Official Airline Guide (OAG) in 2000, we have examined the network characteristics of network samples obtained under different selection rules. In addition, we have examined different size samples based on largest flight volume and largest metropolitan populations. We have shown that although the bias in network characteristics increases with the reduction of the sample size, a relatively small number of areas that includes the largest airports, the largest cities, the most-connected cities, and the most central cities is enough to describe the dynamics of the global spread of influenza. The analysis suggests that a relatively small number of cities (around 200 or 300 out of almost 3000) can capture enough network information to adequately describe the global spread of a disease such as influenza. Weak traffic flows between small airports can contribute to noise and mask other means of spread such as the ground transportation.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2522280?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT georgiybobashev samplingforglobalepidemicmodelsandthetopologyofaninternationalairportnetwork
AT robertjmorris samplingforglobalepidemicmodelsandthetopologyofaninternationalairportnetwork
AT dmichaelgoedecke samplingforglobalepidemicmodelsandthetopologyofaninternationalairportnetwork
_version_ 1725939747014049792