Clinical reasoning of medical students in a public university in Brazil

The aim of this research was to understand the reasoning developed by medical students in a public university in Brazil. This research on education included semi-structured interviews and film recordings of interns discussing 10 clinical cases. A sample of 16 interns analyzed cases presented on a no...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Célia Cristina Fornaziero, Pedro Alejandro Gordan, Mara Lúcia Garanhani
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Associção Brasileira de Educação Médica
Series:Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-55022012000600004&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-bd7c837cefa14c3782c0007ac9eda58f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bd7c837cefa14c3782c0007ac9eda58f2020-11-25T01:42:26ZporAssocição Brasileira de Educação MédicaRevista Brasileira de Educação Médica1981-527136446346910.1590/S0100-55022012000600004S0100-55022012000600004Clinical reasoning of medical students in a public university in BrazilCélia Cristina Fornaziero0Pedro Alejandro Gordan1Mara Lúcia Garanhani2Universidade Estadual de LondrinaUniversidade Estadual de LondrinaUniversidade Estadual de LondrinaThe aim of this research was to understand the reasoning developed by medical students in a public university in Brazil. This research on education included semi-structured interviews and film recordings of interns discussing 10 clinical cases. A sample of 16 interns analyzed cases presented on a notebook computer with a webcam. They were instructed to verbalize all their thoughts on the procedures they would use. The film recordings and transcripts of the interviews were analyzed. Quantitative data was evaluated using Yates' chi-squared test and speech analysis was used to evaluate the transcripts. The theme worked on in the practice of reasoning was: the student's perceptions of their clinical practice. Of the 160 diagnoses, 57% were done with analytical reasoning and 43% with non-analytical reasoning. The hypothetical deductive method was employed by 31% of the interns and the inductive method was employed by 69%. The diagnostic accuracy was 81% correct for easy cases and 85% correct for difficult cases. We observed two empirical categories: the cognitive universe of the student and the patient's context.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-55022012000600004&lng=en&tlng=enDiagnosisProblem SolvingMethodsQualitative ResearchMedical EducationInternship and Residency
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Célia Cristina Fornaziero
Pedro Alejandro Gordan
Mara Lúcia Garanhani
spellingShingle Célia Cristina Fornaziero
Pedro Alejandro Gordan
Mara Lúcia Garanhani
Clinical reasoning of medical students in a public university in Brazil
Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica
Diagnosis
Problem Solving
Methods
Qualitative Research
Medical Education
Internship and Residency
author_facet Célia Cristina Fornaziero
Pedro Alejandro Gordan
Mara Lúcia Garanhani
author_sort Célia Cristina Fornaziero
title Clinical reasoning of medical students in a public university in Brazil
title_short Clinical reasoning of medical students in a public university in Brazil
title_full Clinical reasoning of medical students in a public university in Brazil
title_fullStr Clinical reasoning of medical students in a public university in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Clinical reasoning of medical students in a public university in Brazil
title_sort clinical reasoning of medical students in a public university in brazil
publisher Associção Brasileira de Educação Médica
series Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica
issn 1981-5271
description The aim of this research was to understand the reasoning developed by medical students in a public university in Brazil. This research on education included semi-structured interviews and film recordings of interns discussing 10 clinical cases. A sample of 16 interns analyzed cases presented on a notebook computer with a webcam. They were instructed to verbalize all their thoughts on the procedures they would use. The film recordings and transcripts of the interviews were analyzed. Quantitative data was evaluated using Yates' chi-squared test and speech analysis was used to evaluate the transcripts. The theme worked on in the practice of reasoning was: the student's perceptions of their clinical practice. Of the 160 diagnoses, 57% were done with analytical reasoning and 43% with non-analytical reasoning. The hypothetical deductive method was employed by 31% of the interns and the inductive method was employed by 69%. The diagnostic accuracy was 81% correct for easy cases and 85% correct for difficult cases. We observed two empirical categories: the cognitive universe of the student and the patient's context.
topic Diagnosis
Problem Solving
Methods
Qualitative Research
Medical Education
Internship and Residency
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-55022012000600004&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT celiacristinafornaziero clinicalreasoningofmedicalstudentsinapublicuniversityinbrazil
AT pedroalejandrogordan clinicalreasoningofmedicalstudentsinapublicuniversityinbrazil
AT maraluciagaranhani clinicalreasoningofmedicalstudentsinapublicuniversityinbrazil
_version_ 1725036422791954432