Quantifying Habitual Physical Activity and Sedentariness in Older Adults—Different Outcomes of Two Simultaneously Body-Worn Motion Sensor Approaches and a Self-Estimation
Applicable and accurate assessment methods are required for a clinically relevant quantification of habitual physical activity (PA) levels and sedentariness in older adults. The aim of this study is to compare habitual PA and sedentariness, as assessed with (1) a wrist-worn actigraph, (2) a hybrid m...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Sensors |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/7/1877 |
id |
doaj-bd83dcbd85b84f23a966b86c87cc4b30 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bd83dcbd85b84f23a966b86c87cc4b302020-11-25T02:30:00ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202020-03-01201877187710.3390/s20071877Quantifying Habitual Physical Activity and Sedentariness in Older Adults—Different Outcomes of Two Simultaneously Body-Worn Motion Sensor Approaches and a Self-EstimationRieke Trumpf0Wiebren Zijlstra1Peter Haussermann2Tim Fleiner3Institute of Movement and Sport Gerontology, German Sport University Cologne, 50933 Cologne, GermanyInstitute of Movement and Sport Gerontology, German Sport University Cologne, 50933 Cologne, GermanyDepartment of Geriatric Psychiatry & Psychotherapy, LVR-Hospital Cologne, 51109 Cologne, GermanyInstitute of Movement and Sport Gerontology, German Sport University Cologne, 50933 Cologne, GermanyApplicable and accurate assessment methods are required for a clinically relevant quantification of habitual physical activity (PA) levels and sedentariness in older adults. The aim of this study is to compare habitual PA and sedentariness, as assessed with (1) a wrist-worn actigraph, (2) a hybrid motion sensor attached to the lower back, and (3) a self-estimation based on a questionnaire. Over the course of one week, PA of 58 community-dwelling subjectively healthy older adults was recorded. The results indicate that actigraphy overestimates the PA levels in older adults, whereas sedentariness is underestimated when compared to the hybrid motion sensor approach. Significantly longer durations (hh:mm/day) for all PA intensities were assessed with the actigraph (light: 04:19; moderate to vigorous: 05:08) when compared to the durations (hh:mm/day) that were assessed with the hybrid motion sensor (light: 01:24; moderate to vigorous: 02:21) and the self-estimated durations (hh:mm/day) (light: 02:33; moderate to vigorous: 03:04). Actigraphy-assessed durations of sedentariness (14:32 hh:mm/day) were significantly shorter when compared to the durations assessed with the hybrid motion sensor (20:15 hh:mm/day). Self-estimated duration of light intensity was significantly shorter when compared to the results of the hybrid motion sensor. The results of the present study highlight the importance of an accurate quantification of habitual PA levels and sedentariness in older adults. The use of hybrid motion sensors can offer important insights into the PA levels and PA types (e.g., sitting, lying) and it can increase the knowledge about mobility-related PA and patterns of sedentariness, while actigraphy appears to be not recommendable for this purpose.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/7/1877actigraphyhybrid motion sensorsphysical activitysedentariness |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Rieke Trumpf Wiebren Zijlstra Peter Haussermann Tim Fleiner |
spellingShingle |
Rieke Trumpf Wiebren Zijlstra Peter Haussermann Tim Fleiner Quantifying Habitual Physical Activity and Sedentariness in Older Adults—Different Outcomes of Two Simultaneously Body-Worn Motion Sensor Approaches and a Self-Estimation Sensors actigraphy hybrid motion sensors physical activity sedentariness |
author_facet |
Rieke Trumpf Wiebren Zijlstra Peter Haussermann Tim Fleiner |
author_sort |
Rieke Trumpf |
title |
Quantifying Habitual Physical Activity and Sedentariness in Older Adults—Different Outcomes of Two Simultaneously Body-Worn Motion Sensor Approaches and a Self-Estimation |
title_short |
Quantifying Habitual Physical Activity and Sedentariness in Older Adults—Different Outcomes of Two Simultaneously Body-Worn Motion Sensor Approaches and a Self-Estimation |
title_full |
Quantifying Habitual Physical Activity and Sedentariness in Older Adults—Different Outcomes of Two Simultaneously Body-Worn Motion Sensor Approaches and a Self-Estimation |
title_fullStr |
Quantifying Habitual Physical Activity and Sedentariness in Older Adults—Different Outcomes of Two Simultaneously Body-Worn Motion Sensor Approaches and a Self-Estimation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quantifying Habitual Physical Activity and Sedentariness in Older Adults—Different Outcomes of Two Simultaneously Body-Worn Motion Sensor Approaches and a Self-Estimation |
title_sort |
quantifying habitual physical activity and sedentariness in older adults—different outcomes of two simultaneously body-worn motion sensor approaches and a self-estimation |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sensors |
issn |
1424-8220 |
publishDate |
2020-03-01 |
description |
Applicable and accurate assessment methods are required for a clinically relevant quantification of habitual physical activity (PA) levels and sedentariness in older adults. The aim of this study is to compare habitual PA and sedentariness, as assessed with (1) a wrist-worn actigraph, (2) a hybrid motion sensor attached to the lower back, and (3) a self-estimation based on a questionnaire. Over the course of one week, PA of 58 community-dwelling subjectively healthy older adults was recorded. The results indicate that actigraphy overestimates the PA levels in older adults, whereas sedentariness is underestimated when compared to the hybrid motion sensor approach. Significantly longer durations (hh:mm/day) for all PA intensities were assessed with the actigraph (light: 04:19; moderate to vigorous: 05:08) when compared to the durations (hh:mm/day) that were assessed with the hybrid motion sensor (light: 01:24; moderate to vigorous: 02:21) and the self-estimated durations (hh:mm/day) (light: 02:33; moderate to vigorous: 03:04). Actigraphy-assessed durations of sedentariness (14:32 hh:mm/day) were significantly shorter when compared to the durations assessed with the hybrid motion sensor (20:15 hh:mm/day). Self-estimated duration of light intensity was significantly shorter when compared to the results of the hybrid motion sensor. The results of the present study highlight the importance of an accurate quantification of habitual PA levels and sedentariness in older adults. The use of hybrid motion sensors can offer important insights into the PA levels and PA types (e.g., sitting, lying) and it can increase the knowledge about mobility-related PA and patterns of sedentariness, while actigraphy appears to be not recommendable for this purpose. |
topic |
actigraphy hybrid motion sensors physical activity sedentariness |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/7/1877 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rieketrumpf quantifyinghabitualphysicalactivityandsedentarinessinolderadultsdifferentoutcomesoftwosimultaneouslybodywornmotionsensorapproachesandaselfestimation AT wiebrenzijlstra quantifyinghabitualphysicalactivityandsedentarinessinolderadultsdifferentoutcomesoftwosimultaneouslybodywornmotionsensorapproachesandaselfestimation AT peterhaussermann quantifyinghabitualphysicalactivityandsedentarinessinolderadultsdifferentoutcomesoftwosimultaneouslybodywornmotionsensorapproachesandaselfestimation AT timfleiner quantifyinghabitualphysicalactivityandsedentarinessinolderadultsdifferentoutcomesoftwosimultaneouslybodywornmotionsensorapproachesandaselfestimation |
_version_ |
1724830413691551744 |