Study on the Relationship between Drivers’ Personal Characters and Non-Standard Traffic Signs Comprehensibility
Drivers’ incorrect perception and interpretation of the road space are among reasons for human errors. Proper road markings are elements improving perception of road space. Their effectiveness relies on traffic participants receiving the provided information correctly. The range of signs used is con...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-03-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2678 |
id |
doaj-bdb23ffed9a2487bb1fababc6de47c36 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bdb23ffed9a2487bb1fababc6de47c362021-03-08T00:00:57ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012021-03-01182678267810.3390/ijerph18052678Study on the Relationship between Drivers’ Personal Characters and Non-Standard Traffic Signs ComprehensibilityAntoni Wontorczyk0Stanislaw Gaca1Institute of Applied Psychology, Jagiellonian University, 30-348 Kraków, PolandDepartment of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, 31-155 Kraków, PolandDrivers’ incorrect perception and interpretation of the road space are among reasons for human errors. Proper road markings are elements improving perception of road space. Their effectiveness relies on traffic participants receiving the provided information correctly. The range of signs used is constantly expanding and unusual situations in traffic require use of non-standard signs or an unusual combination of existing standard signs. The aim of this study was to explore the level of comprehensibility of four different types of non-standard signs. The relationship between the level of comprehensibility of these signs and personality traits of the drivers was also studied. A total of 369 drivers were tested using a questionnaire to analyze the traffic signs comprehensibility and Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). The obtained results indicate that symbolic signs, unlike symbolic and text ones, are much better comprehended by drivers. Men comprehend the significance of non-standard symbolic regulatory signs better than women. Higher level of comprehensibility of symbolic and text regulatory signs is shown by older, better educated drivers and professional drivers. The study found there is a link between personality traits of the driver and the comprehensibility of symbolic regulatory signs.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2678non-standard signsdriver personality traitscomprehensibility traffic signssymbolic and text signswarning and regulatory signs |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Antoni Wontorczyk Stanislaw Gaca |
spellingShingle |
Antoni Wontorczyk Stanislaw Gaca Study on the Relationship between Drivers’ Personal Characters and Non-Standard Traffic Signs Comprehensibility International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health non-standard signs driver personality traits comprehensibility traffic signs symbolic and text signs warning and regulatory signs |
author_facet |
Antoni Wontorczyk Stanislaw Gaca |
author_sort |
Antoni Wontorczyk |
title |
Study on the Relationship between Drivers’ Personal Characters and Non-Standard Traffic Signs Comprehensibility |
title_short |
Study on the Relationship between Drivers’ Personal Characters and Non-Standard Traffic Signs Comprehensibility |
title_full |
Study on the Relationship between Drivers’ Personal Characters and Non-Standard Traffic Signs Comprehensibility |
title_fullStr |
Study on the Relationship between Drivers’ Personal Characters and Non-Standard Traffic Signs Comprehensibility |
title_full_unstemmed |
Study on the Relationship between Drivers’ Personal Characters and Non-Standard Traffic Signs Comprehensibility |
title_sort |
study on the relationship between drivers’ personal characters and non-standard traffic signs comprehensibility |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
issn |
1661-7827 1660-4601 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Drivers’ incorrect perception and interpretation of the road space are among reasons for human errors. Proper road markings are elements improving perception of road space. Their effectiveness relies on traffic participants receiving the provided information correctly. The range of signs used is constantly expanding and unusual situations in traffic require use of non-standard signs or an unusual combination of existing standard signs. The aim of this study was to explore the level of comprehensibility of four different types of non-standard signs. The relationship between the level of comprehensibility of these signs and personality traits of the drivers was also studied. A total of 369 drivers were tested using a questionnaire to analyze the traffic signs comprehensibility and Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). The obtained results indicate that symbolic signs, unlike symbolic and text ones, are much better comprehended by drivers. Men comprehend the significance of non-standard symbolic regulatory signs better than women. Higher level of comprehensibility of symbolic and text regulatory signs is shown by older, better educated drivers and professional drivers. The study found there is a link between personality traits of the driver and the comprehensibility of symbolic regulatory signs. |
topic |
non-standard signs driver personality traits comprehensibility traffic signs symbolic and text signs warning and regulatory signs |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2678 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT antoniwontorczyk studyontherelationshipbetweendriverspersonalcharactersandnonstandardtrafficsignscomprehensibility AT stanislawgaca studyontherelationshipbetweendriverspersonalcharactersandnonstandardtrafficsignscomprehensibility |
_version_ |
1724229231333867520 |