Study on the Relationship between Drivers’ Personal Characters and Non-Standard Traffic Signs Comprehensibility

Drivers’ incorrect perception and interpretation of the road space are among reasons for human errors. Proper road markings are elements improving perception of road space. Their effectiveness relies on traffic participants receiving the provided information correctly. The range of signs used is con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antoni Wontorczyk, Stanislaw Gaca
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2678
id doaj-bdb23ffed9a2487bb1fababc6de47c36
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bdb23ffed9a2487bb1fababc6de47c362021-03-08T00:00:57ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012021-03-01182678267810.3390/ijerph18052678Study on the Relationship between Drivers’ Personal Characters and Non-Standard Traffic Signs ComprehensibilityAntoni Wontorczyk0Stanislaw Gaca1Institute of Applied Psychology, Jagiellonian University, 30-348 Kraków, PolandDepartment of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, 31-155 Kraków, PolandDrivers’ incorrect perception and interpretation of the road space are among reasons for human errors. Proper road markings are elements improving perception of road space. Their effectiveness relies on traffic participants receiving the provided information correctly. The range of signs used is constantly expanding and unusual situations in traffic require use of non-standard signs or an unusual combination of existing standard signs. The aim of this study was to explore the level of comprehensibility of four different types of non-standard signs. The relationship between the level of comprehensibility of these signs and personality traits of the drivers was also studied. A total of 369 drivers were tested using a questionnaire to analyze the traffic signs comprehensibility and Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). The obtained results indicate that symbolic signs, unlike symbolic and text ones, are much better comprehended by drivers. Men comprehend the significance of non-standard symbolic regulatory signs better than women. Higher level of comprehensibility of symbolic and text regulatory signs is shown by older, better educated drivers and professional drivers. The study found there is a link between personality traits of the driver and the comprehensibility of symbolic regulatory signs.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2678non-standard signsdriver personality traitscomprehensibility traffic signssymbolic and text signswarning and regulatory signs
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Antoni Wontorczyk
Stanislaw Gaca
spellingShingle Antoni Wontorczyk
Stanislaw Gaca
Study on the Relationship between Drivers’ Personal Characters and Non-Standard Traffic Signs Comprehensibility
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
non-standard signs
driver personality traits
comprehensibility traffic signs
symbolic and text signs
warning and regulatory signs
author_facet Antoni Wontorczyk
Stanislaw Gaca
author_sort Antoni Wontorczyk
title Study on the Relationship between Drivers’ Personal Characters and Non-Standard Traffic Signs Comprehensibility
title_short Study on the Relationship between Drivers’ Personal Characters and Non-Standard Traffic Signs Comprehensibility
title_full Study on the Relationship between Drivers’ Personal Characters and Non-Standard Traffic Signs Comprehensibility
title_fullStr Study on the Relationship between Drivers’ Personal Characters and Non-Standard Traffic Signs Comprehensibility
title_full_unstemmed Study on the Relationship between Drivers’ Personal Characters and Non-Standard Traffic Signs Comprehensibility
title_sort study on the relationship between drivers’ personal characters and non-standard traffic signs comprehensibility
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1661-7827
1660-4601
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Drivers’ incorrect perception and interpretation of the road space are among reasons for human errors. Proper road markings are elements improving perception of road space. Their effectiveness relies on traffic participants receiving the provided information correctly. The range of signs used is constantly expanding and unusual situations in traffic require use of non-standard signs or an unusual combination of existing standard signs. The aim of this study was to explore the level of comprehensibility of four different types of non-standard signs. The relationship between the level of comprehensibility of these signs and personality traits of the drivers was also studied. A total of 369 drivers were tested using a questionnaire to analyze the traffic signs comprehensibility and Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). The obtained results indicate that symbolic signs, unlike symbolic and text ones, are much better comprehended by drivers. Men comprehend the significance of non-standard symbolic regulatory signs better than women. Higher level of comprehensibility of symbolic and text regulatory signs is shown by older, better educated drivers and professional drivers. The study found there is a link between personality traits of the driver and the comprehensibility of symbolic regulatory signs.
topic non-standard signs
driver personality traits
comprehensibility traffic signs
symbolic and text signs
warning and regulatory signs
url https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2678
work_keys_str_mv AT antoniwontorczyk studyontherelationshipbetweendriverspersonalcharactersandnonstandardtrafficsignscomprehensibility
AT stanislawgaca studyontherelationshipbetweendriverspersonalcharactersandnonstandardtrafficsignscomprehensibility
_version_ 1724229231333867520