Remote Crop Mapping at Scale: Using Satellite Imagery and UAV-Acquired Data as Ground Truth

Timely and accurate agricultural information is needed to inform resource allocation and sustainable practices to improve food security in the developing world. Obtaining this information through traditional surveys is time consuming and labor intensive, making it difficult to collect data at the fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meghan Hegarty-Craver, Jason Polly, Margaret O’Neil, Noel Ujeneza, James Rineer, Robert H. Beach, Daniel Lapidus, Dorota S. Temple
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
UAV
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/12/1984
Description
Summary:Timely and accurate agricultural information is needed to inform resource allocation and sustainable practices to improve food security in the developing world. Obtaining this information through traditional surveys is time consuming and labor intensive, making it difficult to collect data at the frequency and resolution needed to accurately estimate the planted areas of key crops and their distribution during the growing season. Remote sensing technologies can be leveraged to provide consistent, cost-effective, and spatially disaggregated data at high temporal frequency. In this study, we used imagery acquired from unmanned aerial vehicles to create a high-fidelity ground-truth dataset that included examples of large mono-cropped fields, small intercropped fields, and natural vegetation. The imagery was acquired in three rounds of flights at six sites in different agro-ecological zones to capture growing conditions. This dataset was used to train and test a random forest model that was implemented in Google Earth Engine for classifying cropped land using freely available Sentinel-1 and -2 data. This model achieved an overall accuracy of 83%, and a 91% accuracy for maize specifically. The model results were compared with Rwanda’s Seasonal Agricultural Survey, which highlighted biases in the dataset including a lack of examples of mixed land cover.
ISSN:2072-4292