Bioconstruction and biodiversity: their mutual influence

This paper describes the functional role of main benthic constructor organisms and reviews processes by which bioconstructions increase diversity and abundance of associated biota, and the reverse. Based on the literature, patterns of diversity of carbonate bryozoan bioconstructions, one of the most...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Silvia Cocito
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas 2004-04-01
Series:Scientia Marina
Subjects:
Online Access:http://scientiamarina.revistas.csic.es/index.php/scientiamarina/article/view/395
id doaj-bdd370985a3b45018b4be82f2ee7db43
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bdd370985a3b45018b4be82f2ee7db432021-05-05T13:49:46ZengConsejo Superior de Investigaciones CientíficasScientia Marina0214-83581886-81342004-04-0168S113714410.3989/scimar.2004.68s1137391Bioconstruction and biodiversity: their mutual influenceSilvia Cocito0ENEA Marine Environment Research CentreThis paper describes the functional role of main benthic constructor organisms and reviews processes by which bioconstructions increase diversity and abundance of associated biota, and the reverse. Based on the literature, patterns of diversity of carbonate bryozoan bioconstructions, one of the most important groups performing important constructional roles, have been analysed. Diversity of bryozoan bioconstructors seems not to follow the latitudinal gradient, from tropics to increasing distance from tropics, recognised for coral bioconstructors. The only case of a high diversity bryozoan reef (Joulters Cays, Bahamas) represents a situation virtually unique in carbonate environments. Dimension and extension of bryozoan bioconstructions show their maximum in temperate environments, where seasonality or variability of environmental parameters could afford advantages for success to bryozoans. With only one exception (the bryozoan-serpulid build-ups from South Australia), diversity of biota associated with bryozoan bioconstructions is high, but comparison is not possible due to the fact that exhaustive faunal studies are rare, sometimes referring only to one taxon, and environments differing in depth range, salinity, hydrodynamics, trophic diversity, etc. are involved.http://scientiamarina.revistas.csic.es/index.php/scientiamarina/article/view/395biodiversitybiological habitat provisionbioconstructorphysical habitat structureassociated faunabryozoa
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Silvia Cocito
spellingShingle Silvia Cocito
Bioconstruction and biodiversity: their mutual influence
Scientia Marina
biodiversity
biological habitat provision
bioconstructor
physical habitat structure
associated fauna
bryozoa
author_facet Silvia Cocito
author_sort Silvia Cocito
title Bioconstruction and biodiversity: their mutual influence
title_short Bioconstruction and biodiversity: their mutual influence
title_full Bioconstruction and biodiversity: their mutual influence
title_fullStr Bioconstruction and biodiversity: their mutual influence
title_full_unstemmed Bioconstruction and biodiversity: their mutual influence
title_sort bioconstruction and biodiversity: their mutual influence
publisher Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
series Scientia Marina
issn 0214-8358
1886-8134
publishDate 2004-04-01
description This paper describes the functional role of main benthic constructor organisms and reviews processes by which bioconstructions increase diversity and abundance of associated biota, and the reverse. Based on the literature, patterns of diversity of carbonate bryozoan bioconstructions, one of the most important groups performing important constructional roles, have been analysed. Diversity of bryozoan bioconstructors seems not to follow the latitudinal gradient, from tropics to increasing distance from tropics, recognised for coral bioconstructors. The only case of a high diversity bryozoan reef (Joulters Cays, Bahamas) represents a situation virtually unique in carbonate environments. Dimension and extension of bryozoan bioconstructions show their maximum in temperate environments, where seasonality or variability of environmental parameters could afford advantages for success to bryozoans. With only one exception (the bryozoan-serpulid build-ups from South Australia), diversity of biota associated with bryozoan bioconstructions is high, but comparison is not possible due to the fact that exhaustive faunal studies are rare, sometimes referring only to one taxon, and environments differing in depth range, salinity, hydrodynamics, trophic diversity, etc. are involved.
topic biodiversity
biological habitat provision
bioconstructor
physical habitat structure
associated fauna
bryozoa
url http://scientiamarina.revistas.csic.es/index.php/scientiamarina/article/view/395
work_keys_str_mv AT silviacocito bioconstructionandbiodiversitytheirmutualinfluence
_version_ 1721460867418030080