Comparing Augmentative Plating and Exchange Nailing for the Treatment of Nonunion of Femoral Shaft Fracture after Intramedullary Nailing: A Meta‐analysis
Objective The aim of this meta‐analysis was to systematically evaluate the efficacy of augmentative plating (AP) and exchange nailing (EN) in the treatment of nonunion of femoral shaft fracture. Methods For the present meta‐analysis, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Orthopaedic Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12580 |
id |
doaj-bddc275113ab4684b4323295c43621b5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bddc275113ab4684b4323295c43621b52021-02-08T09:50:53ZengWileyOrthopaedic Surgery1757-78531757-78612020-02-01121505710.1111/os.12580Comparing Augmentative Plating and Exchange Nailing for the Treatment of Nonunion of Femoral Shaft Fracture after Intramedullary Nailing: A Meta‐analysisYao‐feng Jin0Hai‐chao Xu1Zhong‐hai Shen2Xue‐kang Pan3Hui Xie4Department of Orthopaedics Surgery The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University Zhejiang ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University Zhejiang ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University Zhejiang ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University Zhejiang ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University Zhejiang ChinaObjective The aim of this meta‐analysis was to systematically evaluate the efficacy of augmentative plating (AP) and exchange nailing (EN) in the treatment of nonunion of femoral shaft fracture. Methods For the present meta‐analysis, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant articles up to April 2019. Two investigators independently evaluated the quality of original publications following the guidelines proposed by the Cochrane Handbook. Data were extracted from the studies and analyzed using Review Manager 5.3. Results Five studies were included in this meta‐analysis, with a total of 506 patients. There were 232 patients in the AP group and 276 patients in the EN group. The AP group was associated with higher union rate (OR, 11.66; 95% CI, 4.31–31.50; P < 0.01), shorter union time (SMD, −1.10; 95% CI, −2.09 to −0.11; P = 0.03), shorter operation time (SMD, −0.55; 95% CI, −0.88 to −0.21; P < 0.01), less blood loss (SMD, −1.72; 95% CI, −3.33 to −0.11; P < 0.01), and fewer complications (OR, −0.11; 95% CI, −0.16 to −0.07; P < 0.01) than the EN group. Conclusion The results of the meta‐analysis showed that AP is found to be superior for nonunion of femoral shaft fractures in both intraoperatively (ie, shorter operation time and less blood loss) and postoperatively (ie, higher union rate, shorter union time, and lower complication rate). Overall, AP was superior to EN in the treatment of nonunion of femoral shaft fractures after intramedullary nailing (IMN).https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12580Augmentative platingExchanging nailingFemoral shaft fracturesIntramedullary nailingNonunion |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yao‐feng Jin Hai‐chao Xu Zhong‐hai Shen Xue‐kang Pan Hui Xie |
spellingShingle |
Yao‐feng Jin Hai‐chao Xu Zhong‐hai Shen Xue‐kang Pan Hui Xie Comparing Augmentative Plating and Exchange Nailing for the Treatment of Nonunion of Femoral Shaft Fracture after Intramedullary Nailing: A Meta‐analysis Orthopaedic Surgery Augmentative plating Exchanging nailing Femoral shaft fractures Intramedullary nailing Nonunion |
author_facet |
Yao‐feng Jin Hai‐chao Xu Zhong‐hai Shen Xue‐kang Pan Hui Xie |
author_sort |
Yao‐feng Jin |
title |
Comparing Augmentative Plating and Exchange Nailing for the Treatment of Nonunion of Femoral Shaft Fracture after Intramedullary Nailing: A Meta‐analysis |
title_short |
Comparing Augmentative Plating and Exchange Nailing for the Treatment of Nonunion of Femoral Shaft Fracture after Intramedullary Nailing: A Meta‐analysis |
title_full |
Comparing Augmentative Plating and Exchange Nailing for the Treatment of Nonunion of Femoral Shaft Fracture after Intramedullary Nailing: A Meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr |
Comparing Augmentative Plating and Exchange Nailing for the Treatment of Nonunion of Femoral Shaft Fracture after Intramedullary Nailing: A Meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing Augmentative Plating and Exchange Nailing for the Treatment of Nonunion of Femoral Shaft Fracture after Intramedullary Nailing: A Meta‐analysis |
title_sort |
comparing augmentative plating and exchange nailing for the treatment of nonunion of femoral shaft fracture after intramedullary nailing: a meta‐analysis |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Orthopaedic Surgery |
issn |
1757-7853 1757-7861 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
Objective The aim of this meta‐analysis was to systematically evaluate the efficacy of augmentative plating (AP) and exchange nailing (EN) in the treatment of nonunion of femoral shaft fracture. Methods For the present meta‐analysis, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant articles up to April 2019. Two investigators independently evaluated the quality of original publications following the guidelines proposed by the Cochrane Handbook. Data were extracted from the studies and analyzed using Review Manager 5.3. Results Five studies were included in this meta‐analysis, with a total of 506 patients. There were 232 patients in the AP group and 276 patients in the EN group. The AP group was associated with higher union rate (OR, 11.66; 95% CI, 4.31–31.50; P < 0.01), shorter union time (SMD, −1.10; 95% CI, −2.09 to −0.11; P = 0.03), shorter operation time (SMD, −0.55; 95% CI, −0.88 to −0.21; P < 0.01), less blood loss (SMD, −1.72; 95% CI, −3.33 to −0.11; P < 0.01), and fewer complications (OR, −0.11; 95% CI, −0.16 to −0.07; P < 0.01) than the EN group. Conclusion The results of the meta‐analysis showed that AP is found to be superior for nonunion of femoral shaft fractures in both intraoperatively (ie, shorter operation time and less blood loss) and postoperatively (ie, higher union rate, shorter union time, and lower complication rate). Overall, AP was superior to EN in the treatment of nonunion of femoral shaft fractures after intramedullary nailing (IMN). |
topic |
Augmentative plating Exchanging nailing Femoral shaft fractures Intramedullary nailing Nonunion |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12580 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yaofengjin comparingaugmentativeplatingandexchangenailingforthetreatmentofnonunionoffemoralshaftfractureafterintramedullarynailingametaanalysis AT haichaoxu comparingaugmentativeplatingandexchangenailingforthetreatmentofnonunionoffemoralshaftfractureafterintramedullarynailingametaanalysis AT zhonghaishen comparingaugmentativeplatingandexchangenailingforthetreatmentofnonunionoffemoralshaftfractureafterintramedullarynailingametaanalysis AT xuekangpan comparingaugmentativeplatingandexchangenailingforthetreatmentofnonunionoffemoralshaftfractureafterintramedullarynailingametaanalysis AT huixie comparingaugmentativeplatingandexchangenailingforthetreatmentofnonunionoffemoralshaftfractureafterintramedullarynailingametaanalysis |
_version_ |
1724280224046120960 |