Multimodal Data Fusion in Learning Analytics: A Systematic Review

Multimodal learning analytics (MMLA), which has become increasingly popular, can help provide an accurate understanding of learning processes. However, it is still unclear how multimodal data is integrated into MMLA. By following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Su Mu, Meng Cui, Xiaodi Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/23/6856
id doaj-bdf73755c6a84ed6a9b936562617ebcc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bdf73755c6a84ed6a9b936562617ebcc2020-12-01T00:02:42ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202020-11-01206856685610.3390/s20236856Multimodal Data Fusion in Learning Analytics: A Systematic ReviewSu Mu0Meng Cui1Xiaodi Huang2School of Information Technology in Education, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, ChinaSchool of Information Technology in Education, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, ChinaSchool of Computing and Mathematics, Charles Sturt University, Albury NSW 2640, AustraliaMultimodal learning analytics (MMLA), which has become increasingly popular, can help provide an accurate understanding of learning processes. However, it is still unclear how multimodal data is integrated into MMLA. By following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this paper systematically surveys 346 articles on MMLA published during the past three years. For this purpose, we first present a conceptual model for reviewing these articles from three dimensions: data types, learning indicators, and data fusion. Based on this model, we then answer the following questions: 1. What types of data and learning indicators are used in MMLA, together with their relationships; and 2. What are the classifications of the data fusion methods in MMLA. Finally, we point out the key stages in data fusion and the future research direction in MMLA. Our main findings from this review are (a) The data in MMLA are classified into digital data, physical data, physiological data, psychometric data, and environment data; (b) The learning indicators are behavior, cognition, emotion, collaboration, and engagement; (c) The relationships between multimodal data and learning indicators are one-to-one, one-to-any, and many-to-one. The complex relationships between multimodal data and learning indicators are the key for data fusion; (d) The main data fusion methods in MMLA are many-to-one, many-to-many and multiple validations among multimodal data; and (e) Multimodal data fusion can be characterized by the multimodality of data, multi-dimension of indicators, and diversity of methods.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/23/6856multimodal learning analyticsdata fusionmultimodal datalearning indicatorsonline learning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Su Mu
Meng Cui
Xiaodi Huang
spellingShingle Su Mu
Meng Cui
Xiaodi Huang
Multimodal Data Fusion in Learning Analytics: A Systematic Review
Sensors
multimodal learning analytics
data fusion
multimodal data
learning indicators
online learning
author_facet Su Mu
Meng Cui
Xiaodi Huang
author_sort Su Mu
title Multimodal Data Fusion in Learning Analytics: A Systematic Review
title_short Multimodal Data Fusion in Learning Analytics: A Systematic Review
title_full Multimodal Data Fusion in Learning Analytics: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Multimodal Data Fusion in Learning Analytics: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Multimodal Data Fusion in Learning Analytics: A Systematic Review
title_sort multimodal data fusion in learning analytics: a systematic review
publisher MDPI AG
series Sensors
issn 1424-8220
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Multimodal learning analytics (MMLA), which has become increasingly popular, can help provide an accurate understanding of learning processes. However, it is still unclear how multimodal data is integrated into MMLA. By following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this paper systematically surveys 346 articles on MMLA published during the past three years. For this purpose, we first present a conceptual model for reviewing these articles from three dimensions: data types, learning indicators, and data fusion. Based on this model, we then answer the following questions: 1. What types of data and learning indicators are used in MMLA, together with their relationships; and 2. What are the classifications of the data fusion methods in MMLA. Finally, we point out the key stages in data fusion and the future research direction in MMLA. Our main findings from this review are (a) The data in MMLA are classified into digital data, physical data, physiological data, psychometric data, and environment data; (b) The learning indicators are behavior, cognition, emotion, collaboration, and engagement; (c) The relationships between multimodal data and learning indicators are one-to-one, one-to-any, and many-to-one. The complex relationships between multimodal data and learning indicators are the key for data fusion; (d) The main data fusion methods in MMLA are many-to-one, many-to-many and multiple validations among multimodal data; and (e) Multimodal data fusion can be characterized by the multimodality of data, multi-dimension of indicators, and diversity of methods.
topic multimodal learning analytics
data fusion
multimodal data
learning indicators
online learning
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/23/6856
work_keys_str_mv AT sumu multimodaldatafusioninlearninganalyticsasystematicreview
AT mengcui multimodaldatafusioninlearninganalyticsasystematicreview
AT xiaodihuang multimodaldatafusioninlearninganalyticsasystematicreview
_version_ 1724411282977718272