Reanalysis of an Allocentric Navigation Strategy Scale based on Item Response Theory

Focusing on 12 allocentric/survey-based strategy items of the Navigation Strategy Questionnaire (Zhong & Kozhevnikov, 2016), the current study applied item response theory-based analysis to determine whether a bidimensional model could better describe the latent structure of the survey-based str...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zhong Jimmy Y.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2020-06-01
Series:Open Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2020-0100
id doaj-be01be8b4e0a4fb981914e7dd93452ac
record_format Article
spelling doaj-be01be8b4e0a4fb981914e7dd93452ac2021-09-05T13:59:56ZengDe GruyterOpen Psychology2543-88832020-06-01219010510.1515/psych-2020-0100psych-2020-0100Reanalysis of an Allocentric Navigation Strategy Scale based on Item Response TheoryZhong Jimmy Y.0Faculty/School of Arts and Social Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore117570; School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USAFocusing on 12 allocentric/survey-based strategy items of the Navigation Strategy Questionnaire (Zhong & Kozhevnikov, 2016), the current study applied item response theory-based analysis to determine whether a bidimensional model could better describe the latent structure of the survey-based strategy. Results from item and model fit diagnostics, categorical response and item information curves showed that an item with the lowest rotated component loading (.27) [SURVEY12], could be considered for exclusion in future studies; and that a bidimensional model with three preference-related items constituting a content factor offered a better representation of the latent structure than a unidimensional model per se. Mean scores from these three items also correlated significantly with a pointing-to-landmarks task to the same relative magnitude as the mean scores from all items, and all items excluding SURVEY12. These findings gave early evidence suggesting that the three preference-related items could constitute a subscale for deriving quick estimates of large-scale allocentric spatial processing in healthy adults in both experimental and clinical settings. Potential cognitive and brain mechanisms were discussed, followed by calls for future studies to gather greater evidence confirming the predictive validity of the full and sub scales, along with the design of new items focusing on environmental familiarity.https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2020-0100item response theorymultidimensional model analysisspatial navigationallocentric strategyquestionnaire design
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zhong Jimmy Y.
spellingShingle Zhong Jimmy Y.
Reanalysis of an Allocentric Navigation Strategy Scale based on Item Response Theory
Open Psychology
item response theory
multidimensional model analysis
spatial navigation
allocentric strategy
questionnaire design
author_facet Zhong Jimmy Y.
author_sort Zhong Jimmy Y.
title Reanalysis of an Allocentric Navigation Strategy Scale based on Item Response Theory
title_short Reanalysis of an Allocentric Navigation Strategy Scale based on Item Response Theory
title_full Reanalysis of an Allocentric Navigation Strategy Scale based on Item Response Theory
title_fullStr Reanalysis of an Allocentric Navigation Strategy Scale based on Item Response Theory
title_full_unstemmed Reanalysis of an Allocentric Navigation Strategy Scale based on Item Response Theory
title_sort reanalysis of an allocentric navigation strategy scale based on item response theory
publisher De Gruyter
series Open Psychology
issn 2543-8883
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Focusing on 12 allocentric/survey-based strategy items of the Navigation Strategy Questionnaire (Zhong & Kozhevnikov, 2016), the current study applied item response theory-based analysis to determine whether a bidimensional model could better describe the latent structure of the survey-based strategy. Results from item and model fit diagnostics, categorical response and item information curves showed that an item with the lowest rotated component loading (.27) [SURVEY12], could be considered for exclusion in future studies; and that a bidimensional model with three preference-related items constituting a content factor offered a better representation of the latent structure than a unidimensional model per se. Mean scores from these three items also correlated significantly with a pointing-to-landmarks task to the same relative magnitude as the mean scores from all items, and all items excluding SURVEY12. These findings gave early evidence suggesting that the three preference-related items could constitute a subscale for deriving quick estimates of large-scale allocentric spatial processing in healthy adults in both experimental and clinical settings. Potential cognitive and brain mechanisms were discussed, followed by calls for future studies to gather greater evidence confirming the predictive validity of the full and sub scales, along with the design of new items focusing on environmental familiarity.
topic item response theory
multidimensional model analysis
spatial navigation
allocentric strategy
questionnaire design
url https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2020-0100
work_keys_str_mv AT zhongjimmyy reanalysisofanallocentricnavigationstrategyscalebasedonitemresponsetheory
_version_ 1717812751355609088