| Summary: | Lifestyle databases offer up-to-date, geographically relevant data about individuals. Yet, their application has been slow to extended beyond marketing and into geographical research. This apparent paradox is considered with reference to geocomputation. The unknown quality of the data generates apprehension amongst potential users. Respondents to lifestyle surveys are self-selecting, creating bias in the dataset. Young adults are identified as least likely to return a survey and pensioners more likely. The level of population coverage achieved by the survey varies geographically. Hence, whilst lifestyles offer rich sources of micro-level data to cross-validate or supplement Census-based analysis, greater scientific credential remains as a pre-cursor to academic acceptance.
|
|---|
