Sunburn Protection by Sunscreen Sprays at Beach

Background: The efficacy of sunscreen is evaluated by SPF values, which are quantitatively determined in laboratories on the backs of human subjects according to a standardized procedure. However, SPF cannot be directly translated to sunburn protection under real-life situations because actual effic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hao Ou-Yang, Richard Bradley Rzendzian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-03-01
Series:Cosmetics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2079-9284/4/1/10
id doaj-be365f0b9dc945b393dc3f5c227eb4a3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-be365f0b9dc945b393dc3f5c227eb4a32020-11-24T23:52:06ZengMDPI AGCosmetics2079-92842017-03-01411010.3390/cosmetics4010010cosmetics4010010Sunburn Protection by Sunscreen Sprays at BeachHao Ou-Yang0Richard Bradley Rzendzian1Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. Skillman, NJ 08558, USAJohnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. Skillman, NJ 08558, USABackground: The efficacy of sunscreen is evaluated by SPF values, which are quantitatively determined in laboratories on the backs of human subjects according to a standardized procedure. However, SPF cannot be directly translated to sunburn protection under real-life situations because actual efficacy depends on various factors related to human behaviors and environmental conditions. This study clinically evaluated the efficacy of two sunscreen sprays (SPF 30 and SPF 70) under natural sunlight exposure on healthy subjects at the beach. Methods: Twenty subjects were divided into two cells for the two sunscreen sprays (SPF 70 and SPF 30) in a single-center, actual usage test. The primary endpoint of the study was sunburn protection on the dorsal arms and the secondary endpoint was protection on the face and neck. Subjects stayed at the beach for 4 h after application of the sunscreens with normal beach activities. Subjects’ behavior at the beach, the amounts of sunscreen applied and reapplied, and environmental conditions were all recorded. Results: There was no significant sunburn for a majority of the subjects in either cell. However, neither sunscreen completely blocked the sunburn, especially the face/neck area. We found that the SPF 70 sunscreen was more effective than the SPF 30 sunscreen. Conclusion: Modern sunscreen sprays, applied liberally, are effective in providing sunburn protection for the body in a beach setting.http://www.mdpi.com/2079-9284/4/1/10erythemaswimmingre-applicationexposed skin surfacenatural sunlight
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hao Ou-Yang
Richard Bradley Rzendzian
spellingShingle Hao Ou-Yang
Richard Bradley Rzendzian
Sunburn Protection by Sunscreen Sprays at Beach
Cosmetics
erythema
swimming
re-application
exposed skin surface
natural sunlight
author_facet Hao Ou-Yang
Richard Bradley Rzendzian
author_sort Hao Ou-Yang
title Sunburn Protection by Sunscreen Sprays at Beach
title_short Sunburn Protection by Sunscreen Sprays at Beach
title_full Sunburn Protection by Sunscreen Sprays at Beach
title_fullStr Sunburn Protection by Sunscreen Sprays at Beach
title_full_unstemmed Sunburn Protection by Sunscreen Sprays at Beach
title_sort sunburn protection by sunscreen sprays at beach
publisher MDPI AG
series Cosmetics
issn 2079-9284
publishDate 2017-03-01
description Background: The efficacy of sunscreen is evaluated by SPF values, which are quantitatively determined in laboratories on the backs of human subjects according to a standardized procedure. However, SPF cannot be directly translated to sunburn protection under real-life situations because actual efficacy depends on various factors related to human behaviors and environmental conditions. This study clinically evaluated the efficacy of two sunscreen sprays (SPF 30 and SPF 70) under natural sunlight exposure on healthy subjects at the beach. Methods: Twenty subjects were divided into two cells for the two sunscreen sprays (SPF 70 and SPF 30) in a single-center, actual usage test. The primary endpoint of the study was sunburn protection on the dorsal arms and the secondary endpoint was protection on the face and neck. Subjects stayed at the beach for 4 h after application of the sunscreens with normal beach activities. Subjects’ behavior at the beach, the amounts of sunscreen applied and reapplied, and environmental conditions were all recorded. Results: There was no significant sunburn for a majority of the subjects in either cell. However, neither sunscreen completely blocked the sunburn, especially the face/neck area. We found that the SPF 70 sunscreen was more effective than the SPF 30 sunscreen. Conclusion: Modern sunscreen sprays, applied liberally, are effective in providing sunburn protection for the body in a beach setting.
topic erythema
swimming
re-application
exposed skin surface
natural sunlight
url http://www.mdpi.com/2079-9284/4/1/10
work_keys_str_mv AT haoouyang sunburnprotectionbysunscreenspraysatbeach
AT richardbradleyrzendzian sunburnprotectionbysunscreenspraysatbeach
_version_ 1725474963297665024