Program for data extraction in primary health records: a valid tool for knowledge production in general practice?

Abstract Objectives Research in general practice demands it-tools which give the practitioner trusty results. Medrave 4 is a program designed for extraction of data from all areas of the health record. We wanted to do research on the database in a health center, but found no proof of the quality of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin Holte, Jostein Holmen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-01-01
Series:BMC Research Notes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-4887-7
id doaj-be3728918c7745668c65df379b24e247
record_format Article
spelling doaj-be3728918c7745668c65df379b24e2472021-01-10T12:51:25ZengBMCBMC Research Notes1756-05002020-01-011311510.1186/s13104-020-4887-7Program for data extraction in primary health records: a valid tool for knowledge production in general practice?Martin Holte0Jostein Holmen1Risvollan Health CenterHUNT Research Center, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)Abstract Objectives Research in general practice demands it-tools which give the practitioner trusty results. Medrave 4 is a program designed for extraction of data from all areas of the health record. We wanted to do research on the database in a health center, but found no proof of the quality of the data extracted by Medrave 4. Today the database contains about 40,000 records. In this study we wanted to examine if the program could extract correct data. Results From the database 20 records were randomly selected from five different time periods, making a total of 100 records. 14 records did not meet the inclusion criteria, resulting in 86 records included in the study. In phase one these variables were registered manually from the records: Age, gender, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (from free text) and six different laboratory tests. In phase two, Medrave 4 extracted the same variables from the same records. Medrave 4 found correct systolic and diastolic blood pressure values in 79 records (92%). The laboratory results were extracted correct in all 86 records (100%). We conclude that Medrave 4 can be a useful tool in quantifying the work of general practitioners.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-4887-7Extraction programHealth recordsGeneral practiceResearchQuality control
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Martin Holte
Jostein Holmen
spellingShingle Martin Holte
Jostein Holmen
Program for data extraction in primary health records: a valid tool for knowledge production in general practice?
BMC Research Notes
Extraction program
Health records
General practice
Research
Quality control
author_facet Martin Holte
Jostein Holmen
author_sort Martin Holte
title Program for data extraction in primary health records: a valid tool for knowledge production in general practice?
title_short Program for data extraction in primary health records: a valid tool for knowledge production in general practice?
title_full Program for data extraction in primary health records: a valid tool for knowledge production in general practice?
title_fullStr Program for data extraction in primary health records: a valid tool for knowledge production in general practice?
title_full_unstemmed Program for data extraction in primary health records: a valid tool for knowledge production in general practice?
title_sort program for data extraction in primary health records: a valid tool for knowledge production in general practice?
publisher BMC
series BMC Research Notes
issn 1756-0500
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Abstract Objectives Research in general practice demands it-tools which give the practitioner trusty results. Medrave 4 is a program designed for extraction of data from all areas of the health record. We wanted to do research on the database in a health center, but found no proof of the quality of the data extracted by Medrave 4. Today the database contains about 40,000 records. In this study we wanted to examine if the program could extract correct data. Results From the database 20 records were randomly selected from five different time periods, making a total of 100 records. 14 records did not meet the inclusion criteria, resulting in 86 records included in the study. In phase one these variables were registered manually from the records: Age, gender, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (from free text) and six different laboratory tests. In phase two, Medrave 4 extracted the same variables from the same records. Medrave 4 found correct systolic and diastolic blood pressure values in 79 records (92%). The laboratory results were extracted correct in all 86 records (100%). We conclude that Medrave 4 can be a useful tool in quantifying the work of general practitioners.
topic Extraction program
Health records
General practice
Research
Quality control
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-4887-7
work_keys_str_mv AT martinholte programfordataextractioninprimaryhealthrecordsavalidtoolforknowledgeproductioningeneralpractice
AT josteinholmen programfordataextractioninprimaryhealthrecordsavalidtoolforknowledgeproductioningeneralpractice
_version_ 1724342251071471616