Evaluation of different internal standards for precious metals quantification

The current study involved the evaluation of five different internal standards (Sc, Co, Y, In and La) as well as normal external or direct calibration methods in the simultaneous quantification of all six platinum group metals (PGMs) and gold (precious metals). The use of Sc as internal standard in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. T. Chiweshe, W. Purcell, J. A. Venter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Chemical Society of Ethiopia 2016-02-01
Series:Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Ethiopia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ajol.info/index.php/bcse/article/view/129748
id doaj-be45da6b01114c90b01ac311bad14c4f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-be45da6b01114c90b01ac311bad14c4f2020-11-24T23:38:45ZengChemical Society of EthiopiaBulletin of the Chemical Society of Ethiopia1011-39241726-801X2016-02-013015570http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/bcse.v30i1.5Evaluation of different internal standards for precious metals quantificationT. T. ChiwesheW. PurcellJ. A. VenterThe current study involved the evaluation of five different internal standards (Sc, Co, Y, In and La) as well as normal external or direct calibration methods in the simultaneous quantification of all six platinum group metals (PGMs) and gold (precious metals). The use of Sc as internal standard in the quantitative determination of precious metals in a liquid reference material (RM) and the geological Pyroxenite CRM was shown to yield excellent recoveries (> 99%) compared to the other metals used as internal standard in this study and the direct calibration method (> 91 %).Os recovered only 89% of the expected metal content. The evaluation of different proposed models (wavelength combinations, ionization and/or excitation energy) did not succeed in identifying or discriminating between the unsuccessful and successful internal standards. The robustness of the Sc internal standard addition method was evaluated with the variation in solution matrix (addition of HCl and NaCl). The analytical method (total metal recovery) proved to be very sensitive to elevated unmatched HCl matrix levels (above 1.0 mL of HCl (32% v/v) added) and Na+ addition larger than 4 ppm sodium using ICP-OES. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/bcse.v30i1.5http://www.ajol.info/index.php/bcse/article/view/129748Internal standardScandiumPrecious metalsSpectrometric techniquesICP-OES
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author T. T. Chiweshe
W. Purcell
J. A. Venter
spellingShingle T. T. Chiweshe
W. Purcell
J. A. Venter
Evaluation of different internal standards for precious metals quantification
Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Ethiopia
Internal standard
Scandium
Precious metals
Spectrometric techniques
ICP-OES
author_facet T. T. Chiweshe
W. Purcell
J. A. Venter
author_sort T. T. Chiweshe
title Evaluation of different internal standards for precious metals quantification
title_short Evaluation of different internal standards for precious metals quantification
title_full Evaluation of different internal standards for precious metals quantification
title_fullStr Evaluation of different internal standards for precious metals quantification
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of different internal standards for precious metals quantification
title_sort evaluation of different internal standards for precious metals quantification
publisher Chemical Society of Ethiopia
series Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Ethiopia
issn 1011-3924
1726-801X
publishDate 2016-02-01
description The current study involved the evaluation of five different internal standards (Sc, Co, Y, In and La) as well as normal external or direct calibration methods in the simultaneous quantification of all six platinum group metals (PGMs) and gold (precious metals). The use of Sc as internal standard in the quantitative determination of precious metals in a liquid reference material (RM) and the geological Pyroxenite CRM was shown to yield excellent recoveries (> 99%) compared to the other metals used as internal standard in this study and the direct calibration method (> 91 %).Os recovered only 89% of the expected metal content. The evaluation of different proposed models (wavelength combinations, ionization and/or excitation energy) did not succeed in identifying or discriminating between the unsuccessful and successful internal standards. The robustness of the Sc internal standard addition method was evaluated with the variation in solution matrix (addition of HCl and NaCl). The analytical method (total metal recovery) proved to be very sensitive to elevated unmatched HCl matrix levels (above 1.0 mL of HCl (32% v/v) added) and Na+ addition larger than 4 ppm sodium using ICP-OES. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/bcse.v30i1.5
topic Internal standard
Scandium
Precious metals
Spectrometric techniques
ICP-OES
url http://www.ajol.info/index.php/bcse/article/view/129748
work_keys_str_mv AT ttchiweshe evaluationofdifferentinternalstandardsforpreciousmetalsquantification
AT wpurcell evaluationofdifferentinternalstandardsforpreciousmetalsquantification
AT javenter evaluationofdifferentinternalstandardsforpreciousmetalsquantification
_version_ 1725515940701929472