Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles

Abstract Background Quality and service improvement (QSI) research employs a broad range of methods to enhance the efficiency of healthcare delivery. QSI research differs from traditional healthcare research and poses unique ethical questions. Since QSI research aims to generate knowledge to enhance...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cory E. Goldstein, Charles Weijer, Jamie C. Brehaut, Marion Campbell, Dean A. Fergusson, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Karla Hemming, Austin R. Horn, Monica Taljaard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-06-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-018-2724-2
id doaj-be5e88c8394148068d8f9e333c4555b2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-be5e88c8394148068d8f9e333c4555b22020-11-24T22:04:14ZengBMCTrials1745-62152018-06-011911610.1186/s13063-018-2724-2Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principlesCory E. Goldstein0Charles Weijer1Jamie C. Brehaut2Marion Campbell3Dean A. Fergusson4Jeremy M. Grimshaw5Karla Hemming6Austin R. Horn7Monica Taljaard8Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Western UniversityRotman Institute of Philosophy, Western UniversityClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteHealth Services Research Unit, University of AberdeenClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of BirminghamRotman Institute of Philosophy, Western UniversityClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteAbstract Background Quality and service improvement (QSI) research employs a broad range of methods to enhance the efficiency of healthcare delivery. QSI research differs from traditional healthcare research and poses unique ethical questions. Since QSI research aims to generate knowledge to enhance quality improvement efforts, should it be considered research for regulatory purposes? Is review by a research ethics committee required? Should healthcare providers be considered research participants? If participation in QSI research entails no more than minimal risk, is consent required? The lack of consensus on answers to these questions highlights the need for ethical guidance. Main body Three distinct approaches to classifying QSI research in accordance with existing ethical principles and regulations can be found in the literature. In the first approach, QSI research is viewed as distinct from other types of healthcare research and does not require regulation. In the second approach, QSI research falls within regulatory guidelines but is exempt from research ethics committee review. In the third approach, QSI research is deemed to be part of the learning healthcare system and, as such, is subject to a different set of ethical principles entirely. In this paper, we critically assess each of these views. Conclusion While none of these approaches is entirely satisfactory, we argue that use of the ethical principles governing research provides the best means of addressing the numerous questions posed by QSI research.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-018-2724-2Quality and service improvement researchEthicsInformed consentRegulationResearch ethics committees
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cory E. Goldstein
Charles Weijer
Jamie C. Brehaut
Marion Campbell
Dean A. Fergusson
Jeremy M. Grimshaw
Karla Hemming
Austin R. Horn
Monica Taljaard
spellingShingle Cory E. Goldstein
Charles Weijer
Jamie C. Brehaut
Marion Campbell
Dean A. Fergusson
Jeremy M. Grimshaw
Karla Hemming
Austin R. Horn
Monica Taljaard
Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles
Trials
Quality and service improvement research
Ethics
Informed consent
Regulation
Research ethics committees
author_facet Cory E. Goldstein
Charles Weijer
Jamie C. Brehaut
Marion Campbell
Dean A. Fergusson
Jeremy M. Grimshaw
Karla Hemming
Austin R. Horn
Monica Taljaard
author_sort Cory E. Goldstein
title Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles
title_short Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles
title_full Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles
title_fullStr Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles
title_full_unstemmed Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles
title_sort accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles
publisher BMC
series Trials
issn 1745-6215
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Abstract Background Quality and service improvement (QSI) research employs a broad range of methods to enhance the efficiency of healthcare delivery. QSI research differs from traditional healthcare research and poses unique ethical questions. Since QSI research aims to generate knowledge to enhance quality improvement efforts, should it be considered research for regulatory purposes? Is review by a research ethics committee required? Should healthcare providers be considered research participants? If participation in QSI research entails no more than minimal risk, is consent required? The lack of consensus on answers to these questions highlights the need for ethical guidance. Main body Three distinct approaches to classifying QSI research in accordance with existing ethical principles and regulations can be found in the literature. In the first approach, QSI research is viewed as distinct from other types of healthcare research and does not require regulation. In the second approach, QSI research falls within regulatory guidelines but is exempt from research ethics committee review. In the third approach, QSI research is deemed to be part of the learning healthcare system and, as such, is subject to a different set of ethical principles entirely. In this paper, we critically assess each of these views. Conclusion While none of these approaches is entirely satisfactory, we argue that use of the ethical principles governing research provides the best means of addressing the numerous questions posed by QSI research.
topic Quality and service improvement research
Ethics
Informed consent
Regulation
Research ethics committees
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-018-2724-2
work_keys_str_mv AT coryegoldstein accommodatingqualityandserviceimprovementresearchwithinexistingethicalprinciples
AT charlesweijer accommodatingqualityandserviceimprovementresearchwithinexistingethicalprinciples
AT jamiecbrehaut accommodatingqualityandserviceimprovementresearchwithinexistingethicalprinciples
AT marioncampbell accommodatingqualityandserviceimprovementresearchwithinexistingethicalprinciples
AT deanafergusson accommodatingqualityandserviceimprovementresearchwithinexistingethicalprinciples
AT jeremymgrimshaw accommodatingqualityandserviceimprovementresearchwithinexistingethicalprinciples
AT karlahemming accommodatingqualityandserviceimprovementresearchwithinexistingethicalprinciples
AT austinrhorn accommodatingqualityandserviceimprovementresearchwithinexistingethicalprinciples
AT monicataljaard accommodatingqualityandserviceimprovementresearchwithinexistingethicalprinciples
_version_ 1725829783704567808