Modeling two-oscillator circadian systems entrained by two environmental cycles.

Several experimental studies have altered the phase relationship between photic and non-photic environmental, 24 h cycles (zeitgebers) in order to assess their role in the synchronization of circadian rhythms. To assist in the interpretation of the complex activity patterns that emerge from these &q...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gisele A Oda, W Otto Friesen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3158787?pdf=render
id doaj-be6fbf1dfeed404fad94cb6b9a7be683
record_format Article
spelling doaj-be6fbf1dfeed404fad94cb6b9a7be6832020-11-24T21:26:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-0168e2389510.1371/journal.pone.0023895Modeling two-oscillator circadian systems entrained by two environmental cycles.Gisele A OdaW Otto FriesenSeveral experimental studies have altered the phase relationship between photic and non-photic environmental, 24 h cycles (zeitgebers) in order to assess their role in the synchronization of circadian rhythms. To assist in the interpretation of the complex activity patterns that emerge from these "conflicting zeitgeber" protocols, we present computer simulations of coupled circadian oscillators forced by two independent zeitgebers. This circadian system configuration was first employed by Pittendrigh and Bruce (1959), to model their studies of the light and temperature entrainment of the eclosion oscillator in Drosophila. Whereas most of the recent experiments have restricted conflicting zeitgeber experiments to two experimental conditions, by comparing circadian oscillator phases under two distinct phase relationships between zeitgebers (usually 0 and 12 h), Pittendrigh and Bruce compared eclosion phase under 12 distinct phase relationships, spanning the 24 h interval. Our simulations using non-linear differential equations replicated complex non-linear phenomena, such as "phase jumps" and sudden switches in zeitgeber preferences, which had previously been difficult to interpret. Our simulations reveal that these phenomena generally arise when inter-oscillator coupling is high in relation to the zeitgeber strength. Manipulations in the structural symmetry of the model indicated that these results can be expected to apply to a wide range of system configurations. Finally, our studies recommend the use of the complete protocol employed by Pittendrigh and Bruce, because different system configurations can generate similar results when a "conflicting zeitgeber experiment" incorporates only two phase relationships between zeitgebers.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3158787?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gisele A Oda
W Otto Friesen
spellingShingle Gisele A Oda
W Otto Friesen
Modeling two-oscillator circadian systems entrained by two environmental cycles.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Gisele A Oda
W Otto Friesen
author_sort Gisele A Oda
title Modeling two-oscillator circadian systems entrained by two environmental cycles.
title_short Modeling two-oscillator circadian systems entrained by two environmental cycles.
title_full Modeling two-oscillator circadian systems entrained by two environmental cycles.
title_fullStr Modeling two-oscillator circadian systems entrained by two environmental cycles.
title_full_unstemmed Modeling two-oscillator circadian systems entrained by two environmental cycles.
title_sort modeling two-oscillator circadian systems entrained by two environmental cycles.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Several experimental studies have altered the phase relationship between photic and non-photic environmental, 24 h cycles (zeitgebers) in order to assess their role in the synchronization of circadian rhythms. To assist in the interpretation of the complex activity patterns that emerge from these "conflicting zeitgeber" protocols, we present computer simulations of coupled circadian oscillators forced by two independent zeitgebers. This circadian system configuration was first employed by Pittendrigh and Bruce (1959), to model their studies of the light and temperature entrainment of the eclosion oscillator in Drosophila. Whereas most of the recent experiments have restricted conflicting zeitgeber experiments to two experimental conditions, by comparing circadian oscillator phases under two distinct phase relationships between zeitgebers (usually 0 and 12 h), Pittendrigh and Bruce compared eclosion phase under 12 distinct phase relationships, spanning the 24 h interval. Our simulations using non-linear differential equations replicated complex non-linear phenomena, such as "phase jumps" and sudden switches in zeitgeber preferences, which had previously been difficult to interpret. Our simulations reveal that these phenomena generally arise when inter-oscillator coupling is high in relation to the zeitgeber strength. Manipulations in the structural symmetry of the model indicated that these results can be expected to apply to a wide range of system configurations. Finally, our studies recommend the use of the complete protocol employed by Pittendrigh and Bruce, because different system configurations can generate similar results when a "conflicting zeitgeber experiment" incorporates only two phase relationships between zeitgebers.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3158787?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT giseleaoda modelingtwooscillatorcircadiansystemsentrainedbytwoenvironmentalcycles
AT wottofriesen modelingtwooscillatorcircadiansystemsentrainedbytwoenvironmentalcycles
_version_ 1725978507405688832