Modeling two-oscillator circadian systems entrained by two environmental cycles.
Several experimental studies have altered the phase relationship between photic and non-photic environmental, 24 h cycles (zeitgebers) in order to assess their role in the synchronization of circadian rhythms. To assist in the interpretation of the complex activity patterns that emerge from these &q...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2011-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3158787?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-be6fbf1dfeed404fad94cb6b9a7be683 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-be6fbf1dfeed404fad94cb6b9a7be6832020-11-24T21:26:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-0168e2389510.1371/journal.pone.0023895Modeling two-oscillator circadian systems entrained by two environmental cycles.Gisele A OdaW Otto FriesenSeveral experimental studies have altered the phase relationship between photic and non-photic environmental, 24 h cycles (zeitgebers) in order to assess their role in the synchronization of circadian rhythms. To assist in the interpretation of the complex activity patterns that emerge from these "conflicting zeitgeber" protocols, we present computer simulations of coupled circadian oscillators forced by two independent zeitgebers. This circadian system configuration was first employed by Pittendrigh and Bruce (1959), to model their studies of the light and temperature entrainment of the eclosion oscillator in Drosophila. Whereas most of the recent experiments have restricted conflicting zeitgeber experiments to two experimental conditions, by comparing circadian oscillator phases under two distinct phase relationships between zeitgebers (usually 0 and 12 h), Pittendrigh and Bruce compared eclosion phase under 12 distinct phase relationships, spanning the 24 h interval. Our simulations using non-linear differential equations replicated complex non-linear phenomena, such as "phase jumps" and sudden switches in zeitgeber preferences, which had previously been difficult to interpret. Our simulations reveal that these phenomena generally arise when inter-oscillator coupling is high in relation to the zeitgeber strength. Manipulations in the structural symmetry of the model indicated that these results can be expected to apply to a wide range of system configurations. Finally, our studies recommend the use of the complete protocol employed by Pittendrigh and Bruce, because different system configurations can generate similar results when a "conflicting zeitgeber experiment" incorporates only two phase relationships between zeitgebers.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3158787?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gisele A Oda W Otto Friesen |
spellingShingle |
Gisele A Oda W Otto Friesen Modeling two-oscillator circadian systems entrained by two environmental cycles. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Gisele A Oda W Otto Friesen |
author_sort |
Gisele A Oda |
title |
Modeling two-oscillator circadian systems entrained by two environmental cycles. |
title_short |
Modeling two-oscillator circadian systems entrained by two environmental cycles. |
title_full |
Modeling two-oscillator circadian systems entrained by two environmental cycles. |
title_fullStr |
Modeling two-oscillator circadian systems entrained by two environmental cycles. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Modeling two-oscillator circadian systems entrained by two environmental cycles. |
title_sort |
modeling two-oscillator circadian systems entrained by two environmental cycles. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2011-01-01 |
description |
Several experimental studies have altered the phase relationship between photic and non-photic environmental, 24 h cycles (zeitgebers) in order to assess their role in the synchronization of circadian rhythms. To assist in the interpretation of the complex activity patterns that emerge from these "conflicting zeitgeber" protocols, we present computer simulations of coupled circadian oscillators forced by two independent zeitgebers. This circadian system configuration was first employed by Pittendrigh and Bruce (1959), to model their studies of the light and temperature entrainment of the eclosion oscillator in Drosophila. Whereas most of the recent experiments have restricted conflicting zeitgeber experiments to two experimental conditions, by comparing circadian oscillator phases under two distinct phase relationships between zeitgebers (usually 0 and 12 h), Pittendrigh and Bruce compared eclosion phase under 12 distinct phase relationships, spanning the 24 h interval. Our simulations using non-linear differential equations replicated complex non-linear phenomena, such as "phase jumps" and sudden switches in zeitgeber preferences, which had previously been difficult to interpret. Our simulations reveal that these phenomena generally arise when inter-oscillator coupling is high in relation to the zeitgeber strength. Manipulations in the structural symmetry of the model indicated that these results can be expected to apply to a wide range of system configurations. Finally, our studies recommend the use of the complete protocol employed by Pittendrigh and Bruce, because different system configurations can generate similar results when a "conflicting zeitgeber experiment" incorporates only two phase relationships between zeitgebers. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3158787?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT giseleaoda modelingtwooscillatorcircadiansystemsentrainedbytwoenvironmentalcycles AT wottofriesen modelingtwooscillatorcircadiansystemsentrainedbytwoenvironmentalcycles |
_version_ |
1725978507405688832 |