Reply to Wolf et al.: Why Trap-Neuter-Return (TNR) Is Not an Ethical Solution for Stray Cat Management
We critique the recent article by Wolf et al. (2019) that claims scientific merit for reducing the number of stray cats in Australia through Trap-Neuter-Return (TNR) programs, and then we provide an inventory of biological, welfare, and economic reasons why TNR is less successful than adoption and e...
Main Authors: | John L. Read, Chris R. Dickman, Wayne S. J. Boardman, Christopher A. Lepczyk |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Animals |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/9/1525 |
Similar Items
-
Reply to Crawford et al.: Why Trap-Neuter-Return (TNR) Is an Ethical Solution for Stray Cat<i> </i>Management
by: Peter J. Wolf, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Public Opinions on Strategies for Managing Stray Cats and Predictors of Opposition to Trap-Neuter and Return in Brisbane, Australia
by: Jacquie Rand, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01) -
Application of a Protocol Based on Trap-Neuter-Return (TNR) to Manage Unowned Urban Cats on an Australian University Campus
by: Helen Swarbrick, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01) -
The Road to TNR: Examining Trap-Neuter-Return Through the Lens of Our Evolving Ethics
by: Peter Joseph Wolf, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Study of the effect on shelter cat intakes and euthanasia from a shelter neuter return project of 10,080 cats from March 2010 to June 2014
by: Karen L. Johnson, et al.
Published: (2014-10-01)