Assessing the acceptability of incentivising HPV vaccination consent form return as a means of increasing uptake

Abstract Background Uptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is high overall but there are disparities in uptake, particularly by ethnicity. Incentivising vaccination consent form return is a promising approach to increase vaccination uptake. As part of a randomised feasibility trial we qual...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lauren Rockliffe, Amanda J. Chorley, Emily McBride, Jo Waller, Alice S. Forster
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-03-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-018-5278-z
id doaj-bee33726a47d4cb3a60d97f15066bebb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bee33726a47d4cb3a60d97f15066bebb2020-11-25T02:44:54ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582018-03-011811910.1186/s12889-018-5278-zAssessing the acceptability of incentivising HPV vaccination consent form return as a means of increasing uptakeLauren Rockliffe0Amanda J. Chorley1Emily McBride2Jo Waller3Alice S. Forster4Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCLResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCLResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCLResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCLResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCLAbstract Background Uptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is high overall but there are disparities in uptake, particularly by ethnicity. Incentivising vaccination consent form return is a promising approach to increase vaccination uptake. As part of a randomised feasibility trial we qualitatively assessed the acceptability of increasing uptake of HPV vaccination by incentivising consent form return. Methods In the context of a two-arm, cluster randomised feasibility trial, qualitative free-text questionnaire responses were collected from adolescent girls (n = 181) and their parents (n = 61), assessing the acceptability of an incentive intervention to increase HPV vaccination consent form return. In the incentive intervention arm, girls who returned a signed consent form (regardless of whether consent was given or refused), had a 1-in-10 chance of winning a £50 shopping voucher. Telephone interviews were also conducted with members of staff from participating schools (n = 6), assessing the acceptability of the incentive. Data were analysed thematically. Results Girls and parents provided a mix of positive, negative and ambivalent responses about the use of the incentive to encourage HPV vaccination consent form return. Both girls and parents held misconceptions about the nature of the incentive, wrongly believing that the incentive was dependent on vaccination receipt rather than consent form return. School staff members also expressed a mix of opinions on the acceptability of the incentive, including perceptions of effectiveness and ethics. Conclusions The use of an incentive intervention to encourage the return of HPV vaccination consent forms was found to be moderately acceptable to those receiving and delivering the intervention, although a number of changes are required to improve this. In particular, improving communication about the nature of the incentive to reduce misconceptions is vital. These findings suggest that incentivising consent form return may be an acceptable means of improving HPV vaccination rates, should improvements be made. Trial registration ISRCTN Registry; ISRCTN72136061, 26 September 2016, retrospectively registered.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-018-5278-zVaccinationRewardAdolescentPapillomavirus vaccinesMotivationPrevention
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lauren Rockliffe
Amanda J. Chorley
Emily McBride
Jo Waller
Alice S. Forster
spellingShingle Lauren Rockliffe
Amanda J. Chorley
Emily McBride
Jo Waller
Alice S. Forster
Assessing the acceptability of incentivising HPV vaccination consent form return as a means of increasing uptake
BMC Public Health
Vaccination
Reward
Adolescent
Papillomavirus vaccines
Motivation
Prevention
author_facet Lauren Rockliffe
Amanda J. Chorley
Emily McBride
Jo Waller
Alice S. Forster
author_sort Lauren Rockliffe
title Assessing the acceptability of incentivising HPV vaccination consent form return as a means of increasing uptake
title_short Assessing the acceptability of incentivising HPV vaccination consent form return as a means of increasing uptake
title_full Assessing the acceptability of incentivising HPV vaccination consent form return as a means of increasing uptake
title_fullStr Assessing the acceptability of incentivising HPV vaccination consent form return as a means of increasing uptake
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the acceptability of incentivising HPV vaccination consent form return as a means of increasing uptake
title_sort assessing the acceptability of incentivising hpv vaccination consent form return as a means of increasing uptake
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Abstract Background Uptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is high overall but there are disparities in uptake, particularly by ethnicity. Incentivising vaccination consent form return is a promising approach to increase vaccination uptake. As part of a randomised feasibility trial we qualitatively assessed the acceptability of increasing uptake of HPV vaccination by incentivising consent form return. Methods In the context of a two-arm, cluster randomised feasibility trial, qualitative free-text questionnaire responses were collected from adolescent girls (n = 181) and their parents (n = 61), assessing the acceptability of an incentive intervention to increase HPV vaccination consent form return. In the incentive intervention arm, girls who returned a signed consent form (regardless of whether consent was given or refused), had a 1-in-10 chance of winning a £50 shopping voucher. Telephone interviews were also conducted with members of staff from participating schools (n = 6), assessing the acceptability of the incentive. Data were analysed thematically. Results Girls and parents provided a mix of positive, negative and ambivalent responses about the use of the incentive to encourage HPV vaccination consent form return. Both girls and parents held misconceptions about the nature of the incentive, wrongly believing that the incentive was dependent on vaccination receipt rather than consent form return. School staff members also expressed a mix of opinions on the acceptability of the incentive, including perceptions of effectiveness and ethics. Conclusions The use of an incentive intervention to encourage the return of HPV vaccination consent forms was found to be moderately acceptable to those receiving and delivering the intervention, although a number of changes are required to improve this. In particular, improving communication about the nature of the incentive to reduce misconceptions is vital. These findings suggest that incentivising consent form return may be an acceptable means of improving HPV vaccination rates, should improvements be made. Trial registration ISRCTN Registry; ISRCTN72136061, 26 September 2016, retrospectively registered.
topic Vaccination
Reward
Adolescent
Papillomavirus vaccines
Motivation
Prevention
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-018-5278-z
work_keys_str_mv AT laurenrockliffe assessingtheacceptabilityofincentivisinghpvvaccinationconsentformreturnasameansofincreasinguptake
AT amandajchorley assessingtheacceptabilityofincentivisinghpvvaccinationconsentformreturnasameansofincreasinguptake
AT emilymcbride assessingtheacceptabilityofincentivisinghpvvaccinationconsentformreturnasameansofincreasinguptake
AT jowaller assessingtheacceptabilityofincentivisinghpvvaccinationconsentformreturnasameansofincreasinguptake
AT alicesforster assessingtheacceptabilityofincentivisinghpvvaccinationconsentformreturnasameansofincreasinguptake
_version_ 1724765317011341312