Assessing the acceptability of incentivising HPV vaccination consent form return as a means of increasing uptake
Abstract Background Uptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is high overall but there are disparities in uptake, particularly by ethnicity. Incentivising vaccination consent form return is a promising approach to increase vaccination uptake. As part of a randomised feasibility trial we qual...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-03-01
|
Series: | BMC Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-018-5278-z |
id |
doaj-bee33726a47d4cb3a60d97f15066bebb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bee33726a47d4cb3a60d97f15066bebb2020-11-25T02:44:54ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582018-03-011811910.1186/s12889-018-5278-zAssessing the acceptability of incentivising HPV vaccination consent form return as a means of increasing uptakeLauren Rockliffe0Amanda J. Chorley1Emily McBride2Jo Waller3Alice S. Forster4Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCLResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCLResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCLResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCLResearch Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCLAbstract Background Uptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is high overall but there are disparities in uptake, particularly by ethnicity. Incentivising vaccination consent form return is a promising approach to increase vaccination uptake. As part of a randomised feasibility trial we qualitatively assessed the acceptability of increasing uptake of HPV vaccination by incentivising consent form return. Methods In the context of a two-arm, cluster randomised feasibility trial, qualitative free-text questionnaire responses were collected from adolescent girls (n = 181) and their parents (n = 61), assessing the acceptability of an incentive intervention to increase HPV vaccination consent form return. In the incentive intervention arm, girls who returned a signed consent form (regardless of whether consent was given or refused), had a 1-in-10 chance of winning a £50 shopping voucher. Telephone interviews were also conducted with members of staff from participating schools (n = 6), assessing the acceptability of the incentive. Data were analysed thematically. Results Girls and parents provided a mix of positive, negative and ambivalent responses about the use of the incentive to encourage HPV vaccination consent form return. Both girls and parents held misconceptions about the nature of the incentive, wrongly believing that the incentive was dependent on vaccination receipt rather than consent form return. School staff members also expressed a mix of opinions on the acceptability of the incentive, including perceptions of effectiveness and ethics. Conclusions The use of an incentive intervention to encourage the return of HPV vaccination consent forms was found to be moderately acceptable to those receiving and delivering the intervention, although a number of changes are required to improve this. In particular, improving communication about the nature of the incentive to reduce misconceptions is vital. These findings suggest that incentivising consent form return may be an acceptable means of improving HPV vaccination rates, should improvements be made. Trial registration ISRCTN Registry; ISRCTN72136061, 26 September 2016, retrospectively registered.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-018-5278-zVaccinationRewardAdolescentPapillomavirus vaccinesMotivationPrevention |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lauren Rockliffe Amanda J. Chorley Emily McBride Jo Waller Alice S. Forster |
spellingShingle |
Lauren Rockliffe Amanda J. Chorley Emily McBride Jo Waller Alice S. Forster Assessing the acceptability of incentivising HPV vaccination consent form return as a means of increasing uptake BMC Public Health Vaccination Reward Adolescent Papillomavirus vaccines Motivation Prevention |
author_facet |
Lauren Rockliffe Amanda J. Chorley Emily McBride Jo Waller Alice S. Forster |
author_sort |
Lauren Rockliffe |
title |
Assessing the acceptability of incentivising HPV vaccination consent form return as a means of increasing uptake |
title_short |
Assessing the acceptability of incentivising HPV vaccination consent form return as a means of increasing uptake |
title_full |
Assessing the acceptability of incentivising HPV vaccination consent form return as a means of increasing uptake |
title_fullStr |
Assessing the acceptability of incentivising HPV vaccination consent form return as a means of increasing uptake |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessing the acceptability of incentivising HPV vaccination consent form return as a means of increasing uptake |
title_sort |
assessing the acceptability of incentivising hpv vaccination consent form return as a means of increasing uptake |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Public Health |
issn |
1471-2458 |
publishDate |
2018-03-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Uptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is high overall but there are disparities in uptake, particularly by ethnicity. Incentivising vaccination consent form return is a promising approach to increase vaccination uptake. As part of a randomised feasibility trial we qualitatively assessed the acceptability of increasing uptake of HPV vaccination by incentivising consent form return. Methods In the context of a two-arm, cluster randomised feasibility trial, qualitative free-text questionnaire responses were collected from adolescent girls (n = 181) and their parents (n = 61), assessing the acceptability of an incentive intervention to increase HPV vaccination consent form return. In the incentive intervention arm, girls who returned a signed consent form (regardless of whether consent was given or refused), had a 1-in-10 chance of winning a £50 shopping voucher. Telephone interviews were also conducted with members of staff from participating schools (n = 6), assessing the acceptability of the incentive. Data were analysed thematically. Results Girls and parents provided a mix of positive, negative and ambivalent responses about the use of the incentive to encourage HPV vaccination consent form return. Both girls and parents held misconceptions about the nature of the incentive, wrongly believing that the incentive was dependent on vaccination receipt rather than consent form return. School staff members also expressed a mix of opinions on the acceptability of the incentive, including perceptions of effectiveness and ethics. Conclusions The use of an incentive intervention to encourage the return of HPV vaccination consent forms was found to be moderately acceptable to those receiving and delivering the intervention, although a number of changes are required to improve this. In particular, improving communication about the nature of the incentive to reduce misconceptions is vital. These findings suggest that incentivising consent form return may be an acceptable means of improving HPV vaccination rates, should improvements be made. Trial registration ISRCTN Registry; ISRCTN72136061, 26 September 2016, retrospectively registered. |
topic |
Vaccination Reward Adolescent Papillomavirus vaccines Motivation Prevention |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-018-5278-z |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT laurenrockliffe assessingtheacceptabilityofincentivisinghpvvaccinationconsentformreturnasameansofincreasinguptake AT amandajchorley assessingtheacceptabilityofincentivisinghpvvaccinationconsentformreturnasameansofincreasinguptake AT emilymcbride assessingtheacceptabilityofincentivisinghpvvaccinationconsentformreturnasameansofincreasinguptake AT jowaller assessingtheacceptabilityofincentivisinghpvvaccinationconsentformreturnasameansofincreasinguptake AT alicesforster assessingtheacceptabilityofincentivisinghpvvaccinationconsentformreturnasameansofincreasinguptake |
_version_ |
1724765317011341312 |