Why Should Parliaments Continue to Debate?: The Intertwined Virtues of Parliamentary Debates

Parliamentary debates may seem as anachronistic today given their limited role in forging majorities within parliaments. Yet, this paper seeks to demonstrate that they still play a diversity of other roles. They contribute to frame ideologically a debate and therefore to link policy proposal to elec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Olivier Rozenberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Helsinki University Press 2018-09-01
Series:Redescriptions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal-redescriptions.org/articles/5
id doaj-bf0e87619f9c42deae4bb74da498d405
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bf0e87619f9c42deae4bb74da498d4052020-11-25T03:20:14ZengHelsinki University PressRedescriptions 2308-09142018-09-0121214816610.7227/R.21.2.46Why Should Parliaments Continue to Debate?: The Intertwined Virtues of Parliamentary DebatesOlivier Rozenberg0Sciences PoParliamentary debates may seem as anachronistic today given their limited role in forging majorities within parliaments. Yet, this paper seeks to demonstrate that they still play a diversity of other roles. They contribute to frame ideologically a debate and therefore to link policy proposal to electoral politics. They can also be regarded as ways of both controlling and motivating members. They bring credibility to the view that parliaments are representative – feeding people mimetic relations to politics. Last, they help implementing the accountability process forcing ministers to speak, to listen to criticisms and to answer them. Those four aspects, based on a variety of literature, are considered to be still relevant in the contemporary period.https://journal-redescriptions.org/articles/5parliamentsdebatesrhetoricdemocracyrepresentation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olivier Rozenberg
spellingShingle Olivier Rozenberg
Why Should Parliaments Continue to Debate?: The Intertwined Virtues of Parliamentary Debates
Redescriptions
parliaments
debates
rhetoric
democracy
representation
author_facet Olivier Rozenberg
author_sort Olivier Rozenberg
title Why Should Parliaments Continue to Debate?: The Intertwined Virtues of Parliamentary Debates
title_short Why Should Parliaments Continue to Debate?: The Intertwined Virtues of Parliamentary Debates
title_full Why Should Parliaments Continue to Debate?: The Intertwined Virtues of Parliamentary Debates
title_fullStr Why Should Parliaments Continue to Debate?: The Intertwined Virtues of Parliamentary Debates
title_full_unstemmed Why Should Parliaments Continue to Debate?: The Intertwined Virtues of Parliamentary Debates
title_sort why should parliaments continue to debate?: the intertwined virtues of parliamentary debates
publisher Helsinki University Press
series Redescriptions
issn 2308-0914
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Parliamentary debates may seem as anachronistic today given their limited role in forging majorities within parliaments. Yet, this paper seeks to demonstrate that they still play a diversity of other roles. They contribute to frame ideologically a debate and therefore to link policy proposal to electoral politics. They can also be regarded as ways of both controlling and motivating members. They bring credibility to the view that parliaments are representative – feeding people mimetic relations to politics. Last, they help implementing the accountability process forcing ministers to speak, to listen to criticisms and to answer them. Those four aspects, based on a variety of literature, are considered to be still relevant in the contemporary period.
topic parliaments
debates
rhetoric
democracy
representation
url https://journal-redescriptions.org/articles/5
work_keys_str_mv AT olivierrozenberg whyshouldparliamentscontinuetodebatetheintertwinedvirtuesofparliamentarydebates
_version_ 1724618606091698176