Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients – A phase I current escalation study

Background and objective: A prior meta-analysis revealed that higher doses of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have a better post-stroke upper-extremity motor recovery. While this finding suggests that currents greater than the typically used 2 mA may be more efficacious, the safety an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pratik Y. Chhatbar, MD, PhD, Rong Chen, MD, PhD, Rachael Deardorff, MS, Blair Dellenbach, OT, Steven A. Kautz, PhD, Mark S. George, MD, Wuwei Feng, MD, MS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-05-01
Series:Brain Stimulation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X17306149
id doaj-bf17b938f1be442683e804b98aa7f9c7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bf17b938f1be442683e804b98aa7f9c72021-03-19T07:09:58ZengElsevierBrain Stimulation1935-861X2017-05-01103553559Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients – A phase I current escalation studyPratik Y. Chhatbar, MD, PhD0Rong Chen, MD, PhD1Rachael Deardorff, MS2Blair Dellenbach, OT3Steven A. Kautz, PhD4Mark S. George, MD5Wuwei Feng, MD, MS6Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USADepartment of Neurology, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USACenter for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USADepartment of Health Science & Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USADepartment of Health Science & Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USARalph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Brain Stimulation Laboratory, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USADepartment of Neurology, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Health Science & Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Corresponding author. Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, 19 Hagood Ave, Suite 501, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.Background and objective: A prior meta-analysis revealed that higher doses of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have a better post-stroke upper-extremity motor recovery. While this finding suggests that currents greater than the typically used 2 mA may be more efficacious, the safety and tolerability of higher currents have not been assessed in stroke patients. We aim to assess the safety and tolerability of single session of up to 4 mA in stroke patients. Methods: We adapted a traditional 3 + 3 study design with a current escalation schedule of 1»2»2.5»3»3.5»4 mA for this tDCS safety study. We administered one 30-min session of bihemispheric montage tDCS and simultaneous customary occupational therapy to patients with first-ever ischemic stroke. We assessed safety with pre-defined stopping rules and investigated tolerability through a questionnaire. Additionally, we monitored body resistance and skin temperature in real-time at the electrode contact site. Results: Eighteen patients completed the study. The current was escalated to 4 mA without meeting the pre-defined stopping rules or causing any major safety concern. 50% of patients experienced transient skin redness without injury. No rise in temperature (range 26°C–35 °C) was noted and skin barrier function remained intact (i.e. body resistance >1 kΩ). Conclusion: Our phase I safety study supports that single session of bihemispheric tDCS with current up to 4 mA is safe and tolerable in stroke patients. A phase II study to further test the safety and preliminary efficacy with multi-session tDCS at 4 mA (as compared with lower current and sham stimulation) is a logical next step.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02763826.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X17306149High-doseTranscranial direct current stimulationStroke recoveryDose escalation3+3 designNon-invasive brain stimulation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pratik Y. Chhatbar, MD, PhD
Rong Chen, MD, PhD
Rachael Deardorff, MS
Blair Dellenbach, OT
Steven A. Kautz, PhD
Mark S. George, MD
Wuwei Feng, MD, MS
spellingShingle Pratik Y. Chhatbar, MD, PhD
Rong Chen, MD, PhD
Rachael Deardorff, MS
Blair Dellenbach, OT
Steven A. Kautz, PhD
Mark S. George, MD
Wuwei Feng, MD, MS
Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients – A phase I current escalation study
Brain Stimulation
High-dose
Transcranial direct current stimulation
Stroke recovery
Dose escalation
3+3 design
Non-invasive brain stimulation
author_facet Pratik Y. Chhatbar, MD, PhD
Rong Chen, MD, PhD
Rachael Deardorff, MS
Blair Dellenbach, OT
Steven A. Kautz, PhD
Mark S. George, MD
Wuwei Feng, MD, MS
author_sort Pratik Y. Chhatbar, MD, PhD
title Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients – A phase I current escalation study
title_short Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients – A phase I current escalation study
title_full Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients – A phase I current escalation study
title_fullStr Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients – A phase I current escalation study
title_full_unstemmed Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients – A phase I current escalation study
title_sort safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients – a phase i current escalation study
publisher Elsevier
series Brain Stimulation
issn 1935-861X
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Background and objective: A prior meta-analysis revealed that higher doses of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have a better post-stroke upper-extremity motor recovery. While this finding suggests that currents greater than the typically used 2 mA may be more efficacious, the safety and tolerability of higher currents have not been assessed in stroke patients. We aim to assess the safety and tolerability of single session of up to 4 mA in stroke patients. Methods: We adapted a traditional 3 + 3 study design with a current escalation schedule of 1»2»2.5»3»3.5»4 mA for this tDCS safety study. We administered one 30-min session of bihemispheric montage tDCS and simultaneous customary occupational therapy to patients with first-ever ischemic stroke. We assessed safety with pre-defined stopping rules and investigated tolerability through a questionnaire. Additionally, we monitored body resistance and skin temperature in real-time at the electrode contact site. Results: Eighteen patients completed the study. The current was escalated to 4 mA without meeting the pre-defined stopping rules or causing any major safety concern. 50% of patients experienced transient skin redness without injury. No rise in temperature (range 26°C–35 °C) was noted and skin barrier function remained intact (i.e. body resistance >1 kΩ). Conclusion: Our phase I safety study supports that single session of bihemispheric tDCS with current up to 4 mA is safe and tolerable in stroke patients. A phase II study to further test the safety and preliminary efficacy with multi-session tDCS at 4 mA (as compared with lower current and sham stimulation) is a logical next step.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02763826.
topic High-dose
Transcranial direct current stimulation
Stroke recovery
Dose escalation
3+3 design
Non-invasive brain stimulation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X17306149
work_keys_str_mv AT pratikychhatbarmdphd safetyandtolerabilityoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtostrokepatientsaphaseicurrentescalationstudy
AT rongchenmdphd safetyandtolerabilityoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtostrokepatientsaphaseicurrentescalationstudy
AT rachaeldeardorffms safetyandtolerabilityoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtostrokepatientsaphaseicurrentescalationstudy
AT blairdellenbachot safetyandtolerabilityoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtostrokepatientsaphaseicurrentescalationstudy
AT stevenakautzphd safetyandtolerabilityoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtostrokepatientsaphaseicurrentescalationstudy
AT marksgeorgemd safetyandtolerabilityoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtostrokepatientsaphaseicurrentescalationstudy
AT wuweifengmdms safetyandtolerabilityoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtostrokepatientsaphaseicurrentescalationstudy
_version_ 1724214324617019392