Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients – A phase I current escalation study
Background and objective: A prior meta-analysis revealed that higher doses of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have a better post-stroke upper-extremity motor recovery. While this finding suggests that currents greater than the typically used 2 mA may be more efficacious, the safety an...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2017-05-01
|
Series: | Brain Stimulation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X17306149 |
id |
doaj-bf17b938f1be442683e804b98aa7f9c7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bf17b938f1be442683e804b98aa7f9c72021-03-19T07:09:58ZengElsevierBrain Stimulation1935-861X2017-05-01103553559Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients – A phase I current escalation studyPratik Y. Chhatbar, MD, PhD0Rong Chen, MD, PhD1Rachael Deardorff, MS2Blair Dellenbach, OT3Steven A. Kautz, PhD4Mark S. George, MD5Wuwei Feng, MD, MS6Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USADepartment of Neurology, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USACenter for Biomedical Imaging, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USADepartment of Health Science & Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USADepartment of Health Science & Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USARalph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Brain Stimulation Laboratory, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USADepartment of Neurology, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Health Science & Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Corresponding author. Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, 19 Hagood Ave, Suite 501, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.Background and objective: A prior meta-analysis revealed that higher doses of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have a better post-stroke upper-extremity motor recovery. While this finding suggests that currents greater than the typically used 2 mA may be more efficacious, the safety and tolerability of higher currents have not been assessed in stroke patients. We aim to assess the safety and tolerability of single session of up to 4 mA in stroke patients. Methods: We adapted a traditional 3 + 3 study design with a current escalation schedule of 1»2»2.5»3»3.5»4 mA for this tDCS safety study. We administered one 30-min session of bihemispheric montage tDCS and simultaneous customary occupational therapy to patients with first-ever ischemic stroke. We assessed safety with pre-defined stopping rules and investigated tolerability through a questionnaire. Additionally, we monitored body resistance and skin temperature in real-time at the electrode contact site. Results: Eighteen patients completed the study. The current was escalated to 4 mA without meeting the pre-defined stopping rules or causing any major safety concern. 50% of patients experienced transient skin redness without injury. No rise in temperature (range 26°C–35 °C) was noted and skin barrier function remained intact (i.e. body resistance >1 kΩ). Conclusion: Our phase I safety study supports that single session of bihemispheric tDCS with current up to 4 mA is safe and tolerable in stroke patients. A phase II study to further test the safety and preliminary efficacy with multi-session tDCS at 4 mA (as compared with lower current and sham stimulation) is a logical next step.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02763826.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X17306149High-doseTranscranial direct current stimulationStroke recoveryDose escalation3+3 designNon-invasive brain stimulation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Pratik Y. Chhatbar, MD, PhD Rong Chen, MD, PhD Rachael Deardorff, MS Blair Dellenbach, OT Steven A. Kautz, PhD Mark S. George, MD Wuwei Feng, MD, MS |
spellingShingle |
Pratik Y. Chhatbar, MD, PhD Rong Chen, MD, PhD Rachael Deardorff, MS Blair Dellenbach, OT Steven A. Kautz, PhD Mark S. George, MD Wuwei Feng, MD, MS Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients – A phase I current escalation study Brain Stimulation High-dose Transcranial direct current stimulation Stroke recovery Dose escalation 3+3 design Non-invasive brain stimulation |
author_facet |
Pratik Y. Chhatbar, MD, PhD Rong Chen, MD, PhD Rachael Deardorff, MS Blair Dellenbach, OT Steven A. Kautz, PhD Mark S. George, MD Wuwei Feng, MD, MS |
author_sort |
Pratik Y. Chhatbar, MD, PhD |
title |
Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients – A phase I current escalation study |
title_short |
Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients – A phase I current escalation study |
title_full |
Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients – A phase I current escalation study |
title_fullStr |
Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients – A phase I current escalation study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients – A phase I current escalation study |
title_sort |
safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients – a phase i current escalation study |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Brain Stimulation |
issn |
1935-861X |
publishDate |
2017-05-01 |
description |
Background and objective: A prior meta-analysis revealed that higher doses of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have a better post-stroke upper-extremity motor recovery. While this finding suggests that currents greater than the typically used 2 mA may be more efficacious, the safety and tolerability of higher currents have not been assessed in stroke patients. We aim to assess the safety and tolerability of single session of up to 4 mA in stroke patients. Methods: We adapted a traditional 3 + 3 study design with a current escalation schedule of 1»2»2.5»3»3.5»4 mA for this tDCS safety study. We administered one 30-min session of bihemispheric montage tDCS and simultaneous customary occupational therapy to patients with first-ever ischemic stroke. We assessed safety with pre-defined stopping rules and investigated tolerability through a questionnaire. Additionally, we monitored body resistance and skin temperature in real-time at the electrode contact site. Results: Eighteen patients completed the study. The current was escalated to 4 mA without meeting the pre-defined stopping rules or causing any major safety concern. 50% of patients experienced transient skin redness without injury. No rise in temperature (range 26°C–35 °C) was noted and skin barrier function remained intact (i.e. body resistance >1 kΩ). Conclusion: Our phase I safety study supports that single session of bihemispheric tDCS with current up to 4 mA is safe and tolerable in stroke patients. A phase II study to further test the safety and preliminary efficacy with multi-session tDCS at 4 mA (as compared with lower current and sham stimulation) is a logical next step.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02763826. |
topic |
High-dose Transcranial direct current stimulation Stroke recovery Dose escalation 3+3 design Non-invasive brain stimulation |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X17306149 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pratikychhatbarmdphd safetyandtolerabilityoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtostrokepatientsaphaseicurrentescalationstudy AT rongchenmdphd safetyandtolerabilityoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtostrokepatientsaphaseicurrentescalationstudy AT rachaeldeardorffms safetyandtolerabilityoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtostrokepatientsaphaseicurrentescalationstudy AT blairdellenbachot safetyandtolerabilityoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtostrokepatientsaphaseicurrentescalationstudy AT stevenakautzphd safetyandtolerabilityoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtostrokepatientsaphaseicurrentescalationstudy AT marksgeorgemd safetyandtolerabilityoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtostrokepatientsaphaseicurrentescalationstudy AT wuweifengmdms safetyandtolerabilityoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationtostrokepatientsaphaseicurrentescalationstudy |
_version_ |
1724214324617019392 |