Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric assessment of the statement format Decisional Conflict Scale for Mandarin version

Abstract Background The statement format of the Decisional Conflict Scale (sf-DCS) is designed and widely used to assess patients’ state of uncertainty during health related decision making. As yet no Mandarin version of the sf-DCS has been produced. This study aims to produce the first Mandarin ver...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cui Lu, Wei Mu, Ying-hui Jin, Yue-xian Shi, Ge Li, Yan Li, Fei Han, Tian Xia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-11-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-019-4717-6
id doaj-bf94d94d1cbf429a9fc12fbdd33c32ce
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bf94d94d1cbf429a9fc12fbdd33c32ce2020-11-25T04:12:00ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632019-11-011911910.1186/s12913-019-4717-6Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric assessment of the statement format Decisional Conflict Scale for Mandarin versionCui Lu0Wei Mu1Ying-hui Jin2Yue-xian Shi3Ge Li4Yan Li5Fei Han6Tian Xia7Emergency Department, TEDA HospitalDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese MedicineCenter for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Wuhan UniversitySchool of Nursing, Peking UniversityPublic Health Department, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese MedicineNursing school, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese MedicineEmergency Department, Xuan Wu Traditional Chinese Medicine HospitalCenter for Reproductive Medicine, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese MedicineAbstract Background The statement format of the Decisional Conflict Scale (sf-DCS) is designed and widely used to assess patients’ state of uncertainty during health related decision making. As yet no Mandarin version of the sf-DCS has been produced. This study aims to produce the first Mandarin version of the sf-DCS and test its validity and reliability in mainland China. Methods The translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the original English version of the sf-DCS into Mandarin was carried out in accordance with previously published guidelines. The psychometric properties of sf-DCS were assessed in two hypothesized decision-making contexts through online surveys. Results In the online survey designed to test scale validity and reliability, 437 people responded to the influenza immunization survey and 238 responded to the breast cancer screening survey. The results confirm that the Mandarin version of sf-DCS has good criteria validity and the exploratory factor analysis suggested a fitted revised five factors model by removing three items. Respondents who were “unsure” about their decisions/intentions, had read less information, and reported lower self-perceived prior knowledge level scored higher on sf-DCS. The Cronbach’s alpha for the sf-DCS total score was 0.963 and that for each subscale ranged from 0.784 to 0.937 in both decision making contexts, and the test-retest correlation coefficient was 0.528. Conclusions The Mandarin version of sf-DCS has good criteria validity and its internal consistency is satisfactory. Our analysis suggests a refinement of the original sf-DCS’s factor structure is needed.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-019-4717-6Health decision makingValidation studiesReliabilityPatient
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cui Lu
Wei Mu
Ying-hui Jin
Yue-xian Shi
Ge Li
Yan Li
Fei Han
Tian Xia
spellingShingle Cui Lu
Wei Mu
Ying-hui Jin
Yue-xian Shi
Ge Li
Yan Li
Fei Han
Tian Xia
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric assessment of the statement format Decisional Conflict Scale for Mandarin version
BMC Health Services Research
Health decision making
Validation studies
Reliability
Patient
author_facet Cui Lu
Wei Mu
Ying-hui Jin
Yue-xian Shi
Ge Li
Yan Li
Fei Han
Tian Xia
author_sort Cui Lu
title Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric assessment of the statement format Decisional Conflict Scale for Mandarin version
title_short Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric assessment of the statement format Decisional Conflict Scale for Mandarin version
title_full Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric assessment of the statement format Decisional Conflict Scale for Mandarin version
title_fullStr Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric assessment of the statement format Decisional Conflict Scale for Mandarin version
title_full_unstemmed Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric assessment of the statement format Decisional Conflict Scale for Mandarin version
title_sort cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric assessment of the statement format decisional conflict scale for mandarin version
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Abstract Background The statement format of the Decisional Conflict Scale (sf-DCS) is designed and widely used to assess patients’ state of uncertainty during health related decision making. As yet no Mandarin version of the sf-DCS has been produced. This study aims to produce the first Mandarin version of the sf-DCS and test its validity and reliability in mainland China. Methods The translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the original English version of the sf-DCS into Mandarin was carried out in accordance with previously published guidelines. The psychometric properties of sf-DCS were assessed in two hypothesized decision-making contexts through online surveys. Results In the online survey designed to test scale validity and reliability, 437 people responded to the influenza immunization survey and 238 responded to the breast cancer screening survey. The results confirm that the Mandarin version of sf-DCS has good criteria validity and the exploratory factor analysis suggested a fitted revised five factors model by removing three items. Respondents who were “unsure” about their decisions/intentions, had read less information, and reported lower self-perceived prior knowledge level scored higher on sf-DCS. The Cronbach’s alpha for the sf-DCS total score was 0.963 and that for each subscale ranged from 0.784 to 0.937 in both decision making contexts, and the test-retest correlation coefficient was 0.528. Conclusions The Mandarin version of sf-DCS has good criteria validity and its internal consistency is satisfactory. Our analysis suggests a refinement of the original sf-DCS’s factor structure is needed.
topic Health decision making
Validation studies
Reliability
Patient
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-019-4717-6
work_keys_str_mv AT cuilu crossculturaladaptationandpsychometricassessmentofthestatementformatdecisionalconflictscaleformandarinversion
AT weimu crossculturaladaptationandpsychometricassessmentofthestatementformatdecisionalconflictscaleformandarinversion
AT yinghuijin crossculturaladaptationandpsychometricassessmentofthestatementformatdecisionalconflictscaleformandarinversion
AT yuexianshi crossculturaladaptationandpsychometricassessmentofthestatementformatdecisionalconflictscaleformandarinversion
AT geli crossculturaladaptationandpsychometricassessmentofthestatementformatdecisionalconflictscaleformandarinversion
AT yanli crossculturaladaptationandpsychometricassessmentofthestatementformatdecisionalconflictscaleformandarinversion
AT feihan crossculturaladaptationandpsychometricassessmentofthestatementformatdecisionalconflictscaleformandarinversion
AT tianxia crossculturaladaptationandpsychometricassessmentofthestatementformatdecisionalconflictscaleformandarinversion
_version_ 1724416276953038848