Adverbial clauses: Internally rich, externally null
This paper suggests a novel syntactic treatment of adverbial clauses. The point of departure is the observation – in German and Slavic languages – that there exists an asymmetry in the complexity of subordinating elements in complement and adverbial clauses: While the former feature simplex compleme...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Open Library of Humanities
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Glossa |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/600 |
id |
doaj-bfbedb641b4546f98223c8c600e0ff1b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bfbedb641b4546f98223c8c600e0ff1b2021-09-02T07:58:35ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352019-01-014110.5334/gjgl.600324Adverbial clauses: Internally rich, externally nullAndreas Blümel0Hagen Pitsch1Seminar für Deutsche Philologie, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, K.-Hamburger-Weg 3, GöttingenSeminar für Slavische Philologie, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Humboldtallee 19, GöttingenThis paper suggests a novel syntactic treatment of adverbial clauses. The point of departure is the observation – in German and Slavic languages – that there exists an asymmetry in the complexity of subordinating elements in complement and adverbial clauses: While the former feature simplex complementizers, i.e. heads, the latter to a large extent feature complex prepositional phrases in addition to the adverbial CP. Sense can be made of this observation if adverbial clauses exhibit a structure {PP, CP} in the specifier-less framework of Chomsky (2013). The labeling algorithm suggested in that work delivers no result, i.e. structure remains exocentric in line with the spirit of suggestions regarding adjuncts more generally (Hornstein & Nunes 2008). The underlying reason for the asymmetry is thus that C-elements must be simplex to ensure that the selected complement clause is properly endowed with a syntactic category. There is no corresponding need for this in (unselected) adverbial clauses, and hence no derivational problem for Merging PP with CP which suppresses the application of the labeling algorithm.https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/600adverbial clauseslabelingasymmetrycomplementizerGermanSlavicPolish |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andreas Blümel Hagen Pitsch |
spellingShingle |
Andreas Blümel Hagen Pitsch Adverbial clauses: Internally rich, externally null Glossa adverbial clauses labeling asymmetry complementizer German Slavic Polish |
author_facet |
Andreas Blümel Hagen Pitsch |
author_sort |
Andreas Blümel |
title |
Adverbial clauses: Internally rich, externally null |
title_short |
Adverbial clauses: Internally rich, externally null |
title_full |
Adverbial clauses: Internally rich, externally null |
title_fullStr |
Adverbial clauses: Internally rich, externally null |
title_full_unstemmed |
Adverbial clauses: Internally rich, externally null |
title_sort |
adverbial clauses: internally rich, externally null |
publisher |
Open Library of Humanities |
series |
Glossa |
issn |
2397-1835 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
This paper suggests a novel syntactic treatment of adverbial clauses. The point of departure is the observation – in German and Slavic languages – that there exists an asymmetry in the complexity of subordinating elements in complement and adverbial clauses: While the former feature simplex complementizers, i.e. heads, the latter to a large extent feature complex prepositional phrases in addition to the adverbial CP. Sense can be made of this observation if adverbial clauses exhibit a structure {PP, CP} in the specifier-less framework of Chomsky (2013). The labeling algorithm suggested in that work delivers no result, i.e. structure remains exocentric in line with the spirit of suggestions regarding adjuncts more generally (Hornstein & Nunes 2008). The underlying reason for the asymmetry is thus that C-elements must be simplex to ensure that the selected complement clause is properly endowed with a syntactic category. There is no corresponding need for this in (unselected) adverbial clauses, and hence no derivational problem for Merging PP with CP which suppresses the application of the labeling algorithm. |
topic |
adverbial clauses labeling asymmetry complementizer German Slavic Polish |
url |
https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/600 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andreasblumel adverbialclausesinternallyrichexternallynull AT hagenpitsch adverbialclausesinternallyrichexternallynull |
_version_ |
1721178116818206720 |