Face/façade: the visual and the ethical

Face and façade share not only the same etymological derivation, but also the appeal to the visual perceptual apparatus. Their operation as visual signs/texts, however, reaches far beyond the merely iconic; in the context of the Western culture, face and façade perform the role of the exterior as s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wojciech Kalaga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University 2010-06-01
Series:Journal of Architecture and Urbanism
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mla.vgtu.lt/index.php/JAU/article/view/5780
id doaj-bfc82732b0f444b28b5520a706179584
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bfc82732b0f444b28b5520a7061795842021-07-02T13:40:26ZengVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityJournal of Architecture and Urbanism2029-79552029-79472010-06-0134310.3846/tpa.2010.12Face/façade: the visual and the ethicalWojciech Kalaga0Institute of English Cultures and Literatures, Faculty of Phylology, University of Silesia, 41-205 Sosnowiec, Ul. Gen. S. Grota-Roweckiego 5, Katowice, Poland Face and façade share not only the same etymological derivation, but also the appeal to the visual perceptual apparatus. Their operation as visual signs/texts, however, reaches far beyond the merely iconic; in the context of the Western culture, face and façade perform the role of the exterior as symbolically representing the interior. In spite of what they have in common, the two concepts connote different ethical values. Face, especially in the Levinasian sense, implies absolute sincerity and truthfulness; façade, as a “face of the building,” is in fact a simulacrum of the interior; it implies excess and uses performative-rhetorical devices of deception. Yet the metonimical representation of the inside by the façade naturalizes – through semiotic conventions and games – its fraudulently excessive character; it is only when façade – in its derivative sense as mask – returns to the face and becomes its metaphorical substitute, that its negative ethical value comes to the fore. The paper explores and theorizes – with intercultural references – the semiotic operation of face and façade, as well as provide analyses of visual examples. Santrauka Pasitelkiant tarpkultūrinius pavyzdžius ir semantinės analizės metodą straipsnyje tiriami Veido ir Fasado vaizdinių/sąvokų reikšminis ir etinis aspektai. Ieškoma panašumo tarp abiejų vaizdinių/sąvokų etimologijos ir vizualinio suvokimo struktūrų. Gilinamasi į Veidą ir Fasadą kaip į eksterjero ženklus, simboliniame lygmenyje reprezentuojančius interjerą. Straipsnyje išryškinama, kad tiriamos sąvokos konotuoja skirtingas etines vertes nepaisant dalinio jų tarpusavio panašumo. Veidui priskiriama nuoširdumo ir tikrumo reikšmė. Fasadas (pastato veidas) interpretuojamas kaip interjero simuliakras, todėl siejamas su netikrumu, apgaulingumu. First Published Online: 22 May 2013 Reikšminiai žodžiai: veidas, fasadas, kaukė, metonimija, per- formatyvumas, retoriškumas https://www.mla.vgtu.lt/index.php/JAU/article/view/5780facefaçademaskmetonymyperformativerhetorical
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wojciech Kalaga
spellingShingle Wojciech Kalaga
Face/façade: the visual and the ethical
Journal of Architecture and Urbanism
face
façade
mask
metonymy
performative
rhetorical
author_facet Wojciech Kalaga
author_sort Wojciech Kalaga
title Face/façade: the visual and the ethical
title_short Face/façade: the visual and the ethical
title_full Face/façade: the visual and the ethical
title_fullStr Face/façade: the visual and the ethical
title_full_unstemmed Face/façade: the visual and the ethical
title_sort face/façade: the visual and the ethical
publisher Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
series Journal of Architecture and Urbanism
issn 2029-7955
2029-7947
publishDate 2010-06-01
description Face and façade share not only the same etymological derivation, but also the appeal to the visual perceptual apparatus. Their operation as visual signs/texts, however, reaches far beyond the merely iconic; in the context of the Western culture, face and façade perform the role of the exterior as symbolically representing the interior. In spite of what they have in common, the two concepts connote different ethical values. Face, especially in the Levinasian sense, implies absolute sincerity and truthfulness; façade, as a “face of the building,” is in fact a simulacrum of the interior; it implies excess and uses performative-rhetorical devices of deception. Yet the metonimical representation of the inside by the façade naturalizes – through semiotic conventions and games – its fraudulently excessive character; it is only when façade – in its derivative sense as mask – returns to the face and becomes its metaphorical substitute, that its negative ethical value comes to the fore. The paper explores and theorizes – with intercultural references – the semiotic operation of face and façade, as well as provide analyses of visual examples. Santrauka Pasitelkiant tarpkultūrinius pavyzdžius ir semantinės analizės metodą straipsnyje tiriami Veido ir Fasado vaizdinių/sąvokų reikšminis ir etinis aspektai. Ieškoma panašumo tarp abiejų vaizdinių/sąvokų etimologijos ir vizualinio suvokimo struktūrų. Gilinamasi į Veidą ir Fasadą kaip į eksterjero ženklus, simboliniame lygmenyje reprezentuojančius interjerą. Straipsnyje išryškinama, kad tiriamos sąvokos konotuoja skirtingas etines vertes nepaisant dalinio jų tarpusavio panašumo. Veidui priskiriama nuoširdumo ir tikrumo reikšmė. Fasadas (pastato veidas) interpretuojamas kaip interjero simuliakras, todėl siejamas su netikrumu, apgaulingumu. First Published Online: 22 May 2013 Reikšminiai žodžiai: veidas, fasadas, kaukė, metonimija, per- formatyvumas, retoriškumas
topic face
façade
mask
metonymy
performative
rhetorical
url https://www.mla.vgtu.lt/index.php/JAU/article/view/5780
work_keys_str_mv AT wojciechkalaga facefacadethevisualandtheethical
_version_ 1721328916529938432