Weaning from ventilator and effect of Blender-Humidifier on outcome of it

Background and objectives: the weaning procedure of mechanical ventilation in many patients is a difficult and long process and increases the time of mechanical ventilation. There are numerous ways to achieve this goal. One common way is using CPAP-ventilator. Considering the lower price of Blender-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nemat Bilan, Shalaleh Ganji
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2014-11-01
Series:International Journal of Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ijp.mums.ac.ir/pdf_3395_64e49f6ea4f9ea876aeb9b2dc0e23b79.html
id doaj-bfd9c2c8dd034a33a253d4942f06b534
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bfd9c2c8dd034a33a253d4942f06b5342020-11-25T02:17:07ZengMashhad University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Pediatrics2345-50472345-50552014-11-0124.239453395Weaning from ventilator and effect of Blender-Humidifier on outcome of itNemat Bilan0Shalaleh Ganji1Pediatric Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.Pediatrician, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.Background and objectives: the weaning procedure of mechanical ventilation in many patients is a difficult and long process and increases the time of mechanical ventilation. There are numerous ways to achieve this goal. One common way is using CPAP-ventilator. Considering the lower price of Blender-Humidifier compared to CPAPof ventilator and the limited number of studies in this field, this study was aimed to compare these two procedures.Methods: 102 patients in pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) were allocated randomly in one group: CPAP-ventilator and Blender-Humidifier. Duration of hospital and PICU stay, the number of days of mechanichal ventilation, the frequency of re-intubation, and the mortality of the patients were recorded. Results: the study was conducted on 66 male and 36 female patients (64.7% and 35.3% respectively). The average age was 22.5 ± 4.5 months. The most frequent complaint of the patients at the time of visit was coughing (35%), hyperventilation and respiratory distress (21.6%). Hospital stay was 23±14 and 20±12days in humidifier and cpap groups respectively (p=0/52).PICU stay was 15± 11and 20±11 days in humidifier and cpap groups respectively (p=0/18).Re- intubation rate was 16/2% and 33/5% in humidifier and cpap groups respectively (p=0/15).Mortality rate 8/4% and 21.5% in humidifier and cpap groups respectively (p=0/06). Conclusion: Although there was no statistically significant difference between two groups, considering the differences in mortality rate, the need for re-intubation, rate of hospital and PICU stay, and at the same time, with easy availability and low prices, using Blender- Humidifier is recommended.http://ijp.mums.ac.ir/pdf_3395_64e49f6ea4f9ea876aeb9b2dc0e23b79.htmlCPAP ventilatorBlender- HumidifierPICU
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nemat Bilan
Shalaleh Ganji
spellingShingle Nemat Bilan
Shalaleh Ganji
Weaning from ventilator and effect of Blender-Humidifier on outcome of it
International Journal of Pediatrics
CPAP ventilator
Blender- Humidifier
PICU
author_facet Nemat Bilan
Shalaleh Ganji
author_sort Nemat Bilan
title Weaning from ventilator and effect of Blender-Humidifier on outcome of it
title_short Weaning from ventilator and effect of Blender-Humidifier on outcome of it
title_full Weaning from ventilator and effect of Blender-Humidifier on outcome of it
title_fullStr Weaning from ventilator and effect of Blender-Humidifier on outcome of it
title_full_unstemmed Weaning from ventilator and effect of Blender-Humidifier on outcome of it
title_sort weaning from ventilator and effect of blender-humidifier on outcome of it
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
series International Journal of Pediatrics
issn 2345-5047
2345-5055
publishDate 2014-11-01
description Background and objectives: the weaning procedure of mechanical ventilation in many patients is a difficult and long process and increases the time of mechanical ventilation. There are numerous ways to achieve this goal. One common way is using CPAP-ventilator. Considering the lower price of Blender-Humidifier compared to CPAPof ventilator and the limited number of studies in this field, this study was aimed to compare these two procedures.Methods: 102 patients in pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) were allocated randomly in one group: CPAP-ventilator and Blender-Humidifier. Duration of hospital and PICU stay, the number of days of mechanichal ventilation, the frequency of re-intubation, and the mortality of the patients were recorded. Results: the study was conducted on 66 male and 36 female patients (64.7% and 35.3% respectively). The average age was 22.5 ± 4.5 months. The most frequent complaint of the patients at the time of visit was coughing (35%), hyperventilation and respiratory distress (21.6%). Hospital stay was 23±14 and 20±12days in humidifier and cpap groups respectively (p=0/52).PICU stay was 15± 11and 20±11 days in humidifier and cpap groups respectively (p=0/18).Re- intubation rate was 16/2% and 33/5% in humidifier and cpap groups respectively (p=0/15).Mortality rate 8/4% and 21.5% in humidifier and cpap groups respectively (p=0/06). Conclusion: Although there was no statistically significant difference between two groups, considering the differences in mortality rate, the need for re-intubation, rate of hospital and PICU stay, and at the same time, with easy availability and low prices, using Blender- Humidifier is recommended.
topic CPAP ventilator
Blender- Humidifier
PICU
url http://ijp.mums.ac.ir/pdf_3395_64e49f6ea4f9ea876aeb9b2dc0e23b79.html
work_keys_str_mv AT nematbilan weaningfromventilatorandeffectofblenderhumidifieronoutcomeofit
AT shalalehganji weaningfromventilatorandeffectofblenderhumidifieronoutcomeofit
_version_ 1724888030646370304