Comparison between cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and cigarette smoke extract-induced emphysema

Background Emphysema is the main pathological feature of COPD and also is the focus of the related research. Although several emphysema animal models have been established, exact comparison of findings is seldom. The present study aimed to compare cigarette smoke (CS) exposure-induced emphysema mode...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhi-Hui He, Ping Chen, Yan Chen, Sheng-Dong He, Ji-Ru Ye, Hong-Liang Zhang, Jun Cao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Publishing 2015-03-01
Series:Tobacco Induced Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journalssystem.com/tid/Comparison-between-cigarette-smoke-induced-emphysema-and-cigarette-smoke-extract-induced-emphysema,67144,0,2.html
id doaj-bfee6b169e6f4dd4a9bc8505caf0945a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bfee6b169e6f4dd4a9bc8505caf0945a2020-11-25T02:12:56ZengEuropean PublishingTobacco Induced Diseases1617-96252015-03-0113March10.1186/s12971-015-0033-z67144Comparison between cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and cigarette smoke extract-induced emphysemaZhi-Hui He0Ping Chen1Yan Chen2Sheng-Dong He3Ji-Ru Ye4Hong-Liang Zhang5Jun Cao6Intensive Care Unit, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central-South University, Changsha, ChinaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central-South University, Changsha, ChinaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central-South University, Changsha, ChinaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central-South University, Changsha, ChinaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central-South University, Changsha, ChinaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central-South University, Changsha, ChinaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital, Changsha, ChinaBackground Emphysema is the main pathological feature of COPD and also is the focus of the related research. Although several emphysema animal models have been established, exact comparison of findings is seldom. The present study aimed to compare cigarette smoke (CS) exposure-induced emphysema model and intraperitoneal injection of cigarette smoke extract (CSE)-induced emphysema model to evaluate the effectiveness of the two different modeling methods. Methods Six-week-old male C57BL/6 J mice were used and randomly divided into two groups: CS exposure and intraperitoneal injection of CSE. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups: control and CS or CSE. Lung function, mean linear intercept (MLI), destructive index (DI), apoptotic index (AI), total and differential cells count in broncholavolar lavage fluid (BALF), SOD and IL-6 concentration in serum were measured. Results Compared with their respective controls, lung function was significantly decreased in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01); MLI, DI, and AI of lung tissue were significantly higher in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01); total number of leukocytes, the number and percentage of neutrophils (NEUs), and the number of macrophages (MAC) in BALF were significantly higher in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01); SOD concentration in serum was significantly decreased in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01); IL-6 concentration in serum was significantly increased in in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between CS group and CSE group in any of the parameters described above. Conclusions Both CS exposure and intraperitoneal injection of CSE could induce emphysema and the effectiveness of the two different modeling methods were equal.http://www.journalssystem.com/tid/Comparison-between-cigarette-smoke-induced-emphysema-and-cigarette-smoke-extract-induced-emphysema,67144,0,2.htmlanimalChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)emphysemamodel
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zhi-Hui He
Ping Chen
Yan Chen
Sheng-Dong He
Ji-Ru Ye
Hong-Liang Zhang
Jun Cao
spellingShingle Zhi-Hui He
Ping Chen
Yan Chen
Sheng-Dong He
Ji-Ru Ye
Hong-Liang Zhang
Jun Cao
Comparison between cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and cigarette smoke extract-induced emphysema
Tobacco Induced Diseases
animal
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
emphysema
model
author_facet Zhi-Hui He
Ping Chen
Yan Chen
Sheng-Dong He
Ji-Ru Ye
Hong-Liang Zhang
Jun Cao
author_sort Zhi-Hui He
title Comparison between cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and cigarette smoke extract-induced emphysema
title_short Comparison between cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and cigarette smoke extract-induced emphysema
title_full Comparison between cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and cigarette smoke extract-induced emphysema
title_fullStr Comparison between cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and cigarette smoke extract-induced emphysema
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and cigarette smoke extract-induced emphysema
title_sort comparison between cigarette smoke-induced emphysema and cigarette smoke extract-induced emphysema
publisher European Publishing
series Tobacco Induced Diseases
issn 1617-9625
publishDate 2015-03-01
description Background Emphysema is the main pathological feature of COPD and also is the focus of the related research. Although several emphysema animal models have been established, exact comparison of findings is seldom. The present study aimed to compare cigarette smoke (CS) exposure-induced emphysema model and intraperitoneal injection of cigarette smoke extract (CSE)-induced emphysema model to evaluate the effectiveness of the two different modeling methods. Methods Six-week-old male C57BL/6 J mice were used and randomly divided into two groups: CS exposure and intraperitoneal injection of CSE. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups: control and CS or CSE. Lung function, mean linear intercept (MLI), destructive index (DI), apoptotic index (AI), total and differential cells count in broncholavolar lavage fluid (BALF), SOD and IL-6 concentration in serum were measured. Results Compared with their respective controls, lung function was significantly decreased in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01); MLI, DI, and AI of lung tissue were significantly higher in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01); total number of leukocytes, the number and percentage of neutrophils (NEUs), and the number of macrophages (MAC) in BALF were significantly higher in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01); SOD concentration in serum was significantly decreased in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01); IL-6 concentration in serum was significantly increased in in CS and CSE groups (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between CS group and CSE group in any of the parameters described above. Conclusions Both CS exposure and intraperitoneal injection of CSE could induce emphysema and the effectiveness of the two different modeling methods were equal.
topic animal
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
emphysema
model
url http://www.journalssystem.com/tid/Comparison-between-cigarette-smoke-induced-emphysema-and-cigarette-smoke-extract-induced-emphysema,67144,0,2.html
work_keys_str_mv AT zhihuihe comparisonbetweencigarettesmokeinducedemphysemaandcigarettesmokeextractinducedemphysema
AT pingchen comparisonbetweencigarettesmokeinducedemphysemaandcigarettesmokeextractinducedemphysema
AT yanchen comparisonbetweencigarettesmokeinducedemphysemaandcigarettesmokeextractinducedemphysema
AT shengdonghe comparisonbetweencigarettesmokeinducedemphysemaandcigarettesmokeextractinducedemphysema
AT jiruye comparisonbetweencigarettesmokeinducedemphysemaandcigarettesmokeextractinducedemphysema
AT hongliangzhang comparisonbetweencigarettesmokeinducedemphysemaandcigarettesmokeextractinducedemphysema
AT juncao comparisonbetweencigarettesmokeinducedemphysemaandcigarettesmokeextractinducedemphysema
_version_ 1724907389411393536