The clinical features and prognosis of patients with mucinous breast carcinoma compared with those with infiltrating ductal carcinoma: a population-based study

Abstract Background At present, the characteristics of mucinous breast carcinoma (MBC) and the factors affecting its prognosis are controversial. We compared the clinical features of MBC with those of infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) and summarized the relevant prognostic factors. Methods The Sur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xingtong Zhou, Zhibo Zheng, Yan Li, Weiwei Zhao, Yan Lin, Jieshi Zhang, Qiang Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-05-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08262-0
id doaj-bff06e23dbf74669b959d8e366b0965c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bff06e23dbf74669b959d8e366b0965c2021-05-11T15:00:45ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072021-05-012111910.1186/s12885-021-08262-0The clinical features and prognosis of patients with mucinous breast carcinoma compared with those with infiltrating ductal carcinoma: a population-based studyXingtong Zhou0Zhibo Zheng1Yan Li2Weiwei Zhao3Yan Lin4Jieshi Zhang5Qiang Sun6Department of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesDepartment of International Medical Services, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical UniversityDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesDepartment of International Medical Services, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesAbstract Background At present, the characteristics of mucinous breast carcinoma (MBC) and the factors affecting its prognosis are controversial. We compared the clinical features of MBC with those of infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) and summarized the relevant prognostic factors. Methods The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database includes information on 10,593 patients diagnosed with MBC between 2004 and 2016. Chi-square tests and analyses were used to analyze differences in variables between the MBC and IDC groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the relative impacts of risk factors on cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to assess cancer-specific mortality and were compared using the log-rank test. Results From 2004 to 2016, 10,593 people were diagnosed with MBC, and 402,797 were diagnosed with IDC. Patients with MBC had significantly higher 5−/10-year CSS rates (96.4%/93.4%) than those with IDC (89%/83.8%). Compared with IDC patients, MBC patients had less lymph node metastasis, an earlier stage, a higher rate of hormone receptor positivity and a lower expression rate of HER2. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that age ≥ 60 years old (HR = 1.574, 95%CI: 1.238–2.001, P < 0.001), singled status (HR = 1.676, 95%CI: 1.330–2.112, P < 0.001) and advanced TNM/SEER stage were independent prognostic risk factors for MBC. In addition, positive estrogen receptor (HR = 0.577, 95%CI: 0.334–0.997, P = 0.049), positive progesterone receptor (HR = 0.740, 95%CI: 0.552–0.992, P = 0.044), surgical treatment (HR = 0.395, 95%CI: 0.288–0.542, P < 0.001) and radiotherapy (HR = 0.589, 95%CI: 0.459–0.756, P < 0.001) were identified as protective factors. Conclusion Compared with IDC, MBC has a better prognosis. For patients with MBC, we identified prognostic factors that can help clinicians better assess patient outcomes and guide individualized treatment.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08262-0Mucinous breast carcinomaSurveillance, epidemiology, and end results databaseClinical featuresPrognosis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xingtong Zhou
Zhibo Zheng
Yan Li
Weiwei Zhao
Yan Lin
Jieshi Zhang
Qiang Sun
spellingShingle Xingtong Zhou
Zhibo Zheng
Yan Li
Weiwei Zhao
Yan Lin
Jieshi Zhang
Qiang Sun
The clinical features and prognosis of patients with mucinous breast carcinoma compared with those with infiltrating ductal carcinoma: a population-based study
BMC Cancer
Mucinous breast carcinoma
Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database
Clinical features
Prognosis
author_facet Xingtong Zhou
Zhibo Zheng
Yan Li
Weiwei Zhao
Yan Lin
Jieshi Zhang
Qiang Sun
author_sort Xingtong Zhou
title The clinical features and prognosis of patients with mucinous breast carcinoma compared with those with infiltrating ductal carcinoma: a population-based study
title_short The clinical features and prognosis of patients with mucinous breast carcinoma compared with those with infiltrating ductal carcinoma: a population-based study
title_full The clinical features and prognosis of patients with mucinous breast carcinoma compared with those with infiltrating ductal carcinoma: a population-based study
title_fullStr The clinical features and prognosis of patients with mucinous breast carcinoma compared with those with infiltrating ductal carcinoma: a population-based study
title_full_unstemmed The clinical features and prognosis of patients with mucinous breast carcinoma compared with those with infiltrating ductal carcinoma: a population-based study
title_sort clinical features and prognosis of patients with mucinous breast carcinoma compared with those with infiltrating ductal carcinoma: a population-based study
publisher BMC
series BMC Cancer
issn 1471-2407
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Background At present, the characteristics of mucinous breast carcinoma (MBC) and the factors affecting its prognosis are controversial. We compared the clinical features of MBC with those of infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) and summarized the relevant prognostic factors. Methods The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database includes information on 10,593 patients diagnosed with MBC between 2004 and 2016. Chi-square tests and analyses were used to analyze differences in variables between the MBC and IDC groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the relative impacts of risk factors on cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to assess cancer-specific mortality and were compared using the log-rank test. Results From 2004 to 2016, 10,593 people were diagnosed with MBC, and 402,797 were diagnosed with IDC. Patients with MBC had significantly higher 5−/10-year CSS rates (96.4%/93.4%) than those with IDC (89%/83.8%). Compared with IDC patients, MBC patients had less lymph node metastasis, an earlier stage, a higher rate of hormone receptor positivity and a lower expression rate of HER2. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that age ≥ 60 years old (HR = 1.574, 95%CI: 1.238–2.001, P < 0.001), singled status (HR = 1.676, 95%CI: 1.330–2.112, P < 0.001) and advanced TNM/SEER stage were independent prognostic risk factors for MBC. In addition, positive estrogen receptor (HR = 0.577, 95%CI: 0.334–0.997, P = 0.049), positive progesterone receptor (HR = 0.740, 95%CI: 0.552–0.992, P = 0.044), surgical treatment (HR = 0.395, 95%CI: 0.288–0.542, P < 0.001) and radiotherapy (HR = 0.589, 95%CI: 0.459–0.756, P < 0.001) were identified as protective factors. Conclusion Compared with IDC, MBC has a better prognosis. For patients with MBC, we identified prognostic factors that can help clinicians better assess patient outcomes and guide individualized treatment.
topic Mucinous breast carcinoma
Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database
Clinical features
Prognosis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08262-0
work_keys_str_mv AT xingtongzhou theclinicalfeaturesandprognosisofpatientswithmucinousbreastcarcinomacomparedwiththosewithinfiltratingductalcarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT zhibozheng theclinicalfeaturesandprognosisofpatientswithmucinousbreastcarcinomacomparedwiththosewithinfiltratingductalcarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT yanli theclinicalfeaturesandprognosisofpatientswithmucinousbreastcarcinomacomparedwiththosewithinfiltratingductalcarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT weiweizhao theclinicalfeaturesandprognosisofpatientswithmucinousbreastcarcinomacomparedwiththosewithinfiltratingductalcarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT yanlin theclinicalfeaturesandprognosisofpatientswithmucinousbreastcarcinomacomparedwiththosewithinfiltratingductalcarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT jieshizhang theclinicalfeaturesandprognosisofpatientswithmucinousbreastcarcinomacomparedwiththosewithinfiltratingductalcarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT qiangsun theclinicalfeaturesandprognosisofpatientswithmucinousbreastcarcinomacomparedwiththosewithinfiltratingductalcarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT xingtongzhou clinicalfeaturesandprognosisofpatientswithmucinousbreastcarcinomacomparedwiththosewithinfiltratingductalcarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT zhibozheng clinicalfeaturesandprognosisofpatientswithmucinousbreastcarcinomacomparedwiththosewithinfiltratingductalcarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT yanli clinicalfeaturesandprognosisofpatientswithmucinousbreastcarcinomacomparedwiththosewithinfiltratingductalcarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT weiweizhao clinicalfeaturesandprognosisofpatientswithmucinousbreastcarcinomacomparedwiththosewithinfiltratingductalcarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT yanlin clinicalfeaturesandprognosisofpatientswithmucinousbreastcarcinomacomparedwiththosewithinfiltratingductalcarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT jieshizhang clinicalfeaturesandprognosisofpatientswithmucinousbreastcarcinomacomparedwiththosewithinfiltratingductalcarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT qiangsun clinicalfeaturesandprognosisofpatientswithmucinousbreastcarcinomacomparedwiththosewithinfiltratingductalcarcinomaapopulationbasedstudy
_version_ 1721443796138328064