A meta-analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revised to total knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty

Abstract Background This study was performed to compare the clinical outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revised to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) versus primary TKA. Methods Relevant trials were identified via a search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and PubMed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xuedong Sun, Zheng Su
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-06-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-018-0859-1
id doaj-c007146f96bf45e49900c0690241c453
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c007146f96bf45e49900c0690241c4532020-11-25T01:10:29ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2018-06-011311910.1186/s13018-018-0859-1A meta-analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revised to total knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplastyXuedong Sun0Zheng Su1Department of Orthopaedics, Weifang People’s HospitalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Weifang People’s HospitalAbstract Background This study was performed to compare the clinical outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revised to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) versus primary TKA. Methods Relevant trials were identified via a search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and PubMed from inception to 17 June 2017. A meta-analysis was performed to compare postoperative outcomes between revised UKA and primary TKA with respect to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Knee Society Score (KSS), mean polyethylene thickness, hospital stay, revision rate, range of motion (ROM), and complications. Results Five of 233 studies involving 536 adult patients (revised UKA group, n = 209; primary TKA group, n = 327) were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The primary TKA group had better WOMAC scores, KSS, and ROM than the revised UKA group (P < 0.05). Compared with primary TKA, revision of UKA to TKA required more augments, stems, and bone grafts and a thicker polyethylene component (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the revision rate, hospital stay, or complications (P > 0.05). Conclusion Conversion of UKA to TKA is associated with poorer clinical outcomes than primary TKA. Furthermore, we believe that conversion of UKA to TKA is more complicated than performing primary TKA. Revision UKA often requires more augments, stems, and bone grafts and thicker polyethylene components than primary TKA. However, patients who undergo conversion of UKA to TKA have similar hospital stay, complications, and revision rate as patients who undergo primary TKA.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-018-0859-1Knee osteoarthritisUnicompartmental knee arthroplastyTotal knee arthroplastyMeta-analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xuedong Sun
Zheng Su
spellingShingle Xuedong Sun
Zheng Su
A meta-analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revised to total knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Knee osteoarthritis
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Total knee arthroplasty
Meta-analysis
author_facet Xuedong Sun
Zheng Su
author_sort Xuedong Sun
title A meta-analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revised to total knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty
title_short A meta-analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revised to total knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty
title_full A meta-analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revised to total knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty
title_fullStr A meta-analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revised to total knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revised to total knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty
title_sort meta-analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revised to total knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty
publisher BMC
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
issn 1749-799X
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Abstract Background This study was performed to compare the clinical outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revised to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) versus primary TKA. Methods Relevant trials were identified via a search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and PubMed from inception to 17 June 2017. A meta-analysis was performed to compare postoperative outcomes between revised UKA and primary TKA with respect to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Knee Society Score (KSS), mean polyethylene thickness, hospital stay, revision rate, range of motion (ROM), and complications. Results Five of 233 studies involving 536 adult patients (revised UKA group, n = 209; primary TKA group, n = 327) were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The primary TKA group had better WOMAC scores, KSS, and ROM than the revised UKA group (P < 0.05). Compared with primary TKA, revision of UKA to TKA required more augments, stems, and bone grafts and a thicker polyethylene component (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the revision rate, hospital stay, or complications (P > 0.05). Conclusion Conversion of UKA to TKA is associated with poorer clinical outcomes than primary TKA. Furthermore, we believe that conversion of UKA to TKA is more complicated than performing primary TKA. Revision UKA often requires more augments, stems, and bone grafts and thicker polyethylene components than primary TKA. However, patients who undergo conversion of UKA to TKA have similar hospital stay, complications, and revision rate as patients who undergo primary TKA.
topic Knee osteoarthritis
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Total knee arthroplasty
Meta-analysis
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-018-0859-1
work_keys_str_mv AT xuedongsun ametaanalysisofunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyrevisedtototalkneearthroplastyversusprimarytotalkneearthroplasty
AT zhengsu ametaanalysisofunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyrevisedtototalkneearthroplastyversusprimarytotalkneearthroplasty
AT xuedongsun metaanalysisofunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyrevisedtototalkneearthroplastyversusprimarytotalkneearthroplasty
AT zhengsu metaanalysisofunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyrevisedtototalkneearthroplastyversusprimarytotalkneearthroplasty
_version_ 1725174410220929024