Psychiatrists’ opinion about involuntary outpatient treatment

• Main Authors: A Moleón Ruiz, JC Fuertes Rocañín
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Sociedad Española de Sanidad Penitenciaria
• Series: Revista Española de Sanidad Penitenciaria
• Subjects: tratamiento psiquiátrico involuntario; trastornos mentales; psicosis inducidas por sustancias; jurisprudencia; psiquiatría forense
• Online Access: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1575-06202020000100006&lng=en&tlng=en

ABSTRACT Introduction: Involuntary outpatient treatment (IOT) is a kind of compulsory outpatient treatment, whose aim is to improve the adherence to the treatment in people with severe mental illness and with no awareness of disease. In these cases, therapeutic abandonment involves a high risk of relapse, with appearance of disruptive and/or self-aggressive or hetero-aggressive behavior, repeated hospitalizations and frequent emergencies. The application of IOT is not an issue without contention. Therefore, the need of legislative regulation in Spain has been a controversial subject for several years, and there are both advocates and opponents. Objective: The objective of this study is to bring together the opinion of clinical psychiatrists and resident doctors in psychiatry on the involuntary outpatient treatment and its legislative regulation. Material and method: This study is descriptive in nature. The study population consists of 42 clinical professionals in mental health (32 psychiatrists and 10 resident doctors in psychiatry). At the beginning of this study (March 2018), some of these professionals were working in the Psychiatry Department’s facilities of the University Hospital Complex of Huelva. A personal survey in paper form consisting of ten questions about IOT was carried out to each member of this study. Results: 85.7% of clinicians know the current initiative that tries to carry out the legislative regulation of IOT, and 92.8% of them agree to such regulation. In this sense, 83.3% of them are against the fact that more coercive measures for the psychiatric patients such as the involuntary commitment or the civil incapacitation are regulated and IOT is not. On the one hand, 78.6% of the professionals in mental health believe that IOT is beneficial for the patients. Moreover, 95.2% of them think that is beneficial for their relatives, too. On the other hand, 78.6% of clinicians do not consider that the application of IOT to mentallyill patients is stigmatizing. Conclusion: The vast majority of clinicians think that the legislative regulation of involuntary outpatient treatment is necessary in Spain, and they think this treatment is beneficial not only for the patient but also for their family.