Comparison of two approaches to soil strength classifications

The paper presents a comparison of two approaches to describing vehicle trafficability of cohesive soils. The first approach is based on soil consistency and Atterberg index indicators. The second approach is based on the cone penetrometer measurement and on the vane shear test, as well as on the Ec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomislav Poršinsky, Mario Sraka, Igor Stankić
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Forestry 2006-06-01
Series:Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak_download&id_clanak_jezik=6551
id doaj-c011fdd310814151a05334923b6e0206
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c011fdd310814151a05334923b6e02062020-11-25T01:51:47ZengUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of ForestryCroatian Journal of Forest Engineering1845-57192006-06-012711726Comparison of two approaches to soil strength classificationsTomislav PoršinskyMario SrakaIgor StankićThe paper presents a comparison of two approaches to describing vehicle trafficability of cohesive soils. The first approach is based on soil consistency and Atterberg index indicators. The second approach is based on the cone penetrometer measurement and on the vane shear test, as well as on the EcoWood classification of soil strength.The research was carried out in the lowland region of pedunculate oak forests in the Sava River basin. Three cut-blocks of different moisture and forest soil strength were selected, in which timber was extracted by a forwarder. Measurements and sampling were carried outon undisturbed soil. Research results have shown that both approaches to describing vehicle trafficability of cohesive soils describe the soil strength of forest wilderness in a similar way and provide a good basis for developing a trafficability evaluation system, as a future task of forest engineering. The soil cone index and shear strength values calculated in this research do not concur withthe classes of EcoWood soil strength classification and indicate that the limits and ranges of these parameters are questionable. The problem of defining the threshold values of soil strength parameters covered by this research will be the subject of future investigations.http://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak_download&id_clanak_jezik=6551soil strength classificationshear strengthcone indexconsistency indexliquidity index
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tomislav Poršinsky
Mario Sraka
Igor Stankić
spellingShingle Tomislav Poršinsky
Mario Sraka
Igor Stankić
Comparison of two approaches to soil strength classifications
Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering
soil strength classification
shear strength
cone index
consistency index
liquidity index
author_facet Tomislav Poršinsky
Mario Sraka
Igor Stankić
author_sort Tomislav Poršinsky
title Comparison of two approaches to soil strength classifications
title_short Comparison of two approaches to soil strength classifications
title_full Comparison of two approaches to soil strength classifications
title_fullStr Comparison of two approaches to soil strength classifications
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two approaches to soil strength classifications
title_sort comparison of two approaches to soil strength classifications
publisher University of Zagreb, Faculty of Forestry
series Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering
issn 1845-5719
publishDate 2006-06-01
description The paper presents a comparison of two approaches to describing vehicle trafficability of cohesive soils. The first approach is based on soil consistency and Atterberg index indicators. The second approach is based on the cone penetrometer measurement and on the vane shear test, as well as on the EcoWood classification of soil strength.The research was carried out in the lowland region of pedunculate oak forests in the Sava River basin. Three cut-blocks of different moisture and forest soil strength were selected, in which timber was extracted by a forwarder. Measurements and sampling were carried outon undisturbed soil. Research results have shown that both approaches to describing vehicle trafficability of cohesive soils describe the soil strength of forest wilderness in a similar way and provide a good basis for developing a trafficability evaluation system, as a future task of forest engineering. The soil cone index and shear strength values calculated in this research do not concur withthe classes of EcoWood soil strength classification and indicate that the limits and ranges of these parameters are questionable. The problem of defining the threshold values of soil strength parameters covered by this research will be the subject of future investigations.
topic soil strength classification
shear strength
cone index
consistency index
liquidity index
url http://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak_download&id_clanak_jezik=6551
work_keys_str_mv AT tomislavporsinsky comparisonoftwoapproachestosoilstrengthclassifications
AT mariosraka comparisonoftwoapproachestosoilstrengthclassifications
AT igorstankic comparisonoftwoapproachestosoilstrengthclassifications
_version_ 1724996299267244032