Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance phosmet
Abstract The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Spain, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Greece, for the pesticide active substance phosmet and the assessment of applications for max...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-03-01
|
Series: | EFSA Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6237 |
id |
doaj-c04e02b9ecf54650a0697ca2fdcb6372 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c04e02b9ecf54650a0697ca2fdcb63722021-05-03T01:22:04ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322021-03-01193n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6237Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance phosmetEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA)Maria AnastassiadouMaria ArenaDomenica AuteriAlba BrancatoLaszlo BuraLuis Carrasco CabreraEugenia ChaideftouArianna ChiusoloFederica CrivellenteChloe De LentdeckerMark EgsmoseGabriella FaitLuna GrecoAlessio IppolitoFrederique IstaceSamira JarrahDimitra KardassiRenata LeuschnerAlfonso LostiaChristopher LythgoOriol MagransIris MangasIleana MironTunde MolnarLaura PadovaniJuan Manuel Parra MorteRagnor PedersenHermine ReichMiguel SantosRachel SharpCsaba SzentesAndrea TerronManuela TiramaniBenedicte VagenendeLaura Villamar‐BouzaAbstract The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Spain, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Greece, for the pesticide active substance phosmet and the assessment of applications for maximum residue levels (MRLs) are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of phosmet as an insecticide on citrus fruits, pome fruits, peaches/nectarines and potatoes (field uses). The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6237phosmetpeer reviewrisk assessmentpesticideinsecticide |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Maria Anastassiadou Maria Arena Domenica Auteri Alba Brancato Laszlo Bura Luis Carrasco Cabrera Eugenia Chaideftou Arianna Chiusolo Federica Crivellente Chloe De Lentdecker Mark Egsmose Gabriella Fait Luna Greco Alessio Ippolito Frederique Istace Samira Jarrah Dimitra Kardassi Renata Leuschner Alfonso Lostia Christopher Lythgo Oriol Magrans Iris Mangas Ileana Miron Tunde Molnar Laura Padovani Juan Manuel Parra Morte Ragnor Pedersen Hermine Reich Miguel Santos Rachel Sharp Csaba Szentes Andrea Terron Manuela Tiramani Benedicte Vagenende Laura Villamar‐Bouza |
spellingShingle |
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Maria Anastassiadou Maria Arena Domenica Auteri Alba Brancato Laszlo Bura Luis Carrasco Cabrera Eugenia Chaideftou Arianna Chiusolo Federica Crivellente Chloe De Lentdecker Mark Egsmose Gabriella Fait Luna Greco Alessio Ippolito Frederique Istace Samira Jarrah Dimitra Kardassi Renata Leuschner Alfonso Lostia Christopher Lythgo Oriol Magrans Iris Mangas Ileana Miron Tunde Molnar Laura Padovani Juan Manuel Parra Morte Ragnor Pedersen Hermine Reich Miguel Santos Rachel Sharp Csaba Szentes Andrea Terron Manuela Tiramani Benedicte Vagenende Laura Villamar‐Bouza Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance phosmet EFSA Journal phosmet peer review risk assessment pesticide insecticide |
author_facet |
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Maria Anastassiadou Maria Arena Domenica Auteri Alba Brancato Laszlo Bura Luis Carrasco Cabrera Eugenia Chaideftou Arianna Chiusolo Federica Crivellente Chloe De Lentdecker Mark Egsmose Gabriella Fait Luna Greco Alessio Ippolito Frederique Istace Samira Jarrah Dimitra Kardassi Renata Leuschner Alfonso Lostia Christopher Lythgo Oriol Magrans Iris Mangas Ileana Miron Tunde Molnar Laura Padovani Juan Manuel Parra Morte Ragnor Pedersen Hermine Reich Miguel Santos Rachel Sharp Csaba Szentes Andrea Terron Manuela Tiramani Benedicte Vagenende Laura Villamar‐Bouza |
author_sort |
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) |
title |
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance phosmet |
title_short |
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance phosmet |
title_full |
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance phosmet |
title_fullStr |
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance phosmet |
title_full_unstemmed |
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance phosmet |
title_sort |
peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance phosmet |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
EFSA Journal |
issn |
1831-4732 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Abstract The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Spain, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Greece, for the pesticide active substance phosmet and the assessment of applications for maximum residue levels (MRLs) are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of phosmet as an insecticide on citrus fruits, pome fruits, peaches/nectarines and potatoes (field uses). The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified. |
topic |
phosmet peer review risk assessment pesticide insecticide |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6237 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT europeanfoodsafetyauthorityefsa peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT mariaanastassiadou peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT mariaarena peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT domenicaauteri peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT albabrancato peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT laszlobura peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT luiscarrascocabrera peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT eugeniachaideftou peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT ariannachiusolo peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT federicacrivellente peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT chloedelentdecker peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT markegsmose peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT gabriellafait peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT lunagreco peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT alessioippolito peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT frederiqueistace peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT samirajarrah peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT dimitrakardassi peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT renataleuschner peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT alfonsolostia peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT christopherlythgo peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT oriolmagrans peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT irismangas peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT ileanamiron peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT tundemolnar peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT laurapadovani peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT juanmanuelparramorte peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT ragnorpedersen peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT herminereich peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT miguelsantos peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT rachelsharp peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT csabaszentes peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT andreaterron peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT manuelatiramani peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT benedictevagenende peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet AT lauravillamarbouza peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet |
_version_ |
1721486103165272064 |