Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance phosmet

Abstract The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Spain, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Greece, for the pesticide active substance phosmet and the assessment of applications for max...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Maria Anastassiadou, Maria Arena, Domenica Auteri, Alba Brancato, Laszlo Bura, Luis Carrasco Cabrera, Eugenia Chaideftou, Arianna Chiusolo, Federica Crivellente, Chloe De Lentdecker, Mark Egsmose, Gabriella Fait, Luna Greco, Alessio Ippolito, Frederique Istace, Samira Jarrah, Dimitra Kardassi, Renata Leuschner, Alfonso Lostia, Christopher Lythgo, Oriol Magrans, Iris Mangas, Ileana Miron, Tunde Molnar, Laura Padovani, Juan Manuel Parra Morte, Ragnor Pedersen, Hermine Reich, Miguel Santos, Rachel Sharp, Csaba Szentes, Andrea Terron, Manuela Tiramani, Benedicte Vagenende, Laura Villamar‐Bouza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-03-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6237
id doaj-c04e02b9ecf54650a0697ca2fdcb6372
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c04e02b9ecf54650a0697ca2fdcb63722021-05-03T01:22:04ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322021-03-01193n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6237Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance phosmetEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA)Maria AnastassiadouMaria ArenaDomenica AuteriAlba BrancatoLaszlo BuraLuis Carrasco CabreraEugenia ChaideftouArianna ChiusoloFederica CrivellenteChloe De LentdeckerMark EgsmoseGabriella FaitLuna GrecoAlessio IppolitoFrederique IstaceSamira JarrahDimitra KardassiRenata LeuschnerAlfonso LostiaChristopher LythgoOriol MagransIris MangasIleana MironTunde MolnarLaura PadovaniJuan Manuel Parra MorteRagnor PedersenHermine ReichMiguel SantosRachel SharpCsaba SzentesAndrea TerronManuela TiramaniBenedicte VagenendeLaura Villamar‐BouzaAbstract The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Spain, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Greece, for the pesticide active substance phosmet and the assessment of applications for maximum residue levels (MRLs) are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of phosmet as an insecticide on citrus fruits, pome fruits, peaches/nectarines and potatoes (field uses). The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6237phosmetpeer reviewrisk assessmentpesticideinsecticide
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Maria Anastassiadou
Maria Arena
Domenica Auteri
Alba Brancato
Laszlo Bura
Luis Carrasco Cabrera
Eugenia Chaideftou
Arianna Chiusolo
Federica Crivellente
Chloe De Lentdecker
Mark Egsmose
Gabriella Fait
Luna Greco
Alessio Ippolito
Frederique Istace
Samira Jarrah
Dimitra Kardassi
Renata Leuschner
Alfonso Lostia
Christopher Lythgo
Oriol Magrans
Iris Mangas
Ileana Miron
Tunde Molnar
Laura Padovani
Juan Manuel Parra Morte
Ragnor Pedersen
Hermine Reich
Miguel Santos
Rachel Sharp
Csaba Szentes
Andrea Terron
Manuela Tiramani
Benedicte Vagenende
Laura Villamar‐Bouza
spellingShingle European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Maria Anastassiadou
Maria Arena
Domenica Auteri
Alba Brancato
Laszlo Bura
Luis Carrasco Cabrera
Eugenia Chaideftou
Arianna Chiusolo
Federica Crivellente
Chloe De Lentdecker
Mark Egsmose
Gabriella Fait
Luna Greco
Alessio Ippolito
Frederique Istace
Samira Jarrah
Dimitra Kardassi
Renata Leuschner
Alfonso Lostia
Christopher Lythgo
Oriol Magrans
Iris Mangas
Ileana Miron
Tunde Molnar
Laura Padovani
Juan Manuel Parra Morte
Ragnor Pedersen
Hermine Reich
Miguel Santos
Rachel Sharp
Csaba Szentes
Andrea Terron
Manuela Tiramani
Benedicte Vagenende
Laura Villamar‐Bouza
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance phosmet
EFSA Journal
phosmet
peer review
risk assessment
pesticide
insecticide
author_facet European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Maria Anastassiadou
Maria Arena
Domenica Auteri
Alba Brancato
Laszlo Bura
Luis Carrasco Cabrera
Eugenia Chaideftou
Arianna Chiusolo
Federica Crivellente
Chloe De Lentdecker
Mark Egsmose
Gabriella Fait
Luna Greco
Alessio Ippolito
Frederique Istace
Samira Jarrah
Dimitra Kardassi
Renata Leuschner
Alfonso Lostia
Christopher Lythgo
Oriol Magrans
Iris Mangas
Ileana Miron
Tunde Molnar
Laura Padovani
Juan Manuel Parra Morte
Ragnor Pedersen
Hermine Reich
Miguel Santos
Rachel Sharp
Csaba Szentes
Andrea Terron
Manuela Tiramani
Benedicte Vagenende
Laura Villamar‐Bouza
author_sort European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
title Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance phosmet
title_short Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance phosmet
title_full Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance phosmet
title_fullStr Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance phosmet
title_full_unstemmed Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance phosmet
title_sort peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance phosmet
publisher Wiley
series EFSA Journal
issn 1831-4732
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Spain, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Greece, for the pesticide active substance phosmet and the assessment of applications for maximum residue levels (MRLs) are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of phosmet as an insecticide on citrus fruits, pome fruits, peaches/nectarines and potatoes (field uses). The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.
topic phosmet
peer review
risk assessment
pesticide
insecticide
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6237
work_keys_str_mv AT europeanfoodsafetyauthorityefsa peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT mariaanastassiadou peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT mariaarena peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT domenicaauteri peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT albabrancato peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT laszlobura peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT luiscarrascocabrera peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT eugeniachaideftou peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT ariannachiusolo peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT federicacrivellente peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT chloedelentdecker peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT markegsmose peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT gabriellafait peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT lunagreco peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT alessioippolito peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT frederiqueistace peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT samirajarrah peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT dimitrakardassi peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT renataleuschner peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT alfonsolostia peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT christopherlythgo peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT oriolmagrans peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT irismangas peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT ileanamiron peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT tundemolnar peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT laurapadovani peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT juanmanuelparramorte peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT ragnorpedersen peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT herminereich peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT miguelsantos peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT rachelsharp peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT csabaszentes peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT andreaterron peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT manuelatiramani peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT benedictevagenende peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
AT lauravillamarbouza peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancephosmet
_version_ 1721486103165272064