Measuring the outcomes of long-term care for unpaid carers: comparing the ASCOT-Carer, Carer Experience Scale and EQ-5D-3 L

Abstract Background The ASCOT-Carer and Carer Experience Scale are instruments designed to capture aspects of quality of life ‘beyond health’ for family carers. The aim of this study was to compare and validate these two carer care-related measures, with a secondary aim to compare both instruments t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stacey Rand, Juliette Malley, Florin Vadean, Julien Forder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-12-01
Series:Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1254-2
id doaj-c068bc6f2d614f00ad1b702c0b833af0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c068bc6f2d614f00ad1b702c0b833af02020-12-20T12:13:16ZengBMCHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes1477-75252019-12-0117111210.1186/s12955-019-1254-2Measuring the outcomes of long-term care for unpaid carers: comparing the ASCOT-Carer, Carer Experience Scale and EQ-5D-3 LStacey Rand0Juliette Malley1Florin Vadean2Julien Forder3Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), Cornwallis Building, University of KentThe Care Policy and Evaluation Centre (CPEC), London School of Economics and Political SciencePersonal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), Cornwallis Building, University of KentPersonal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), Cornwallis Building, University of KentAbstract Background The ASCOT-Carer and Carer Experience Scale are instruments designed to capture aspects of quality of life ‘beyond health’ for family carers. The aim of this study was to compare and validate these two carer care-related measures, with a secondary aim to compare both instruments to the three-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3 L) measure of health-related quality of life. Methods An interview survey was conducted with 387 carers of adults who used long-term care (also known as social care) support in England. Construct validity by hypothesis testing was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficient. Exploratory factor analysis was also applied to investigate the dimensionality of the combined items from the ASCOT-Carer and CES (as measures of carer quality of life ‘beyond health’) and the EQ-5D (as a measure of health-related quality of life). Results In the construct validity analysis, hypothesised differences in correlations were observed with two exceptions. The exploratory factor analysis indicated that the ASCOT-Carer, CES and EQ-5D-3 L items loaded onto three separate factors. The first factor comprised the seven ASCOT-Carer items plus two CES items (activities outside caring, support from friends and family). The second factor comprised three of the six CES items (fulfilment from caring, control over caring and getting on with the person you care for). The third factor included four of the five EQ-5D-3 L items. Conclusion The findings indicate that the ASCOT-Carer, CES and EQ-5D-3 L capture separate constructs of social care-related quality of life (ASCOT-Carer) and carer experience (CES), which partially overlap in relation to activities outside caring and social support, and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3 L). The ASCOT-Carer and CES are both promising measures for the evaluation of social care support for carers that capture aspects of quality of life ‘beyond health’. The choice of whether to use the ASCOT-Carer or CES depends on the study objectives.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1254-2Quality of lifeCaregiverSocial careLong-term careASCOT-Carer
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stacey Rand
Juliette Malley
Florin Vadean
Julien Forder
spellingShingle Stacey Rand
Juliette Malley
Florin Vadean
Julien Forder
Measuring the outcomes of long-term care for unpaid carers: comparing the ASCOT-Carer, Carer Experience Scale and EQ-5D-3 L
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Quality of life
Caregiver
Social care
Long-term care
ASCOT-Carer
author_facet Stacey Rand
Juliette Malley
Florin Vadean
Julien Forder
author_sort Stacey Rand
title Measuring the outcomes of long-term care for unpaid carers: comparing the ASCOT-Carer, Carer Experience Scale and EQ-5D-3 L
title_short Measuring the outcomes of long-term care for unpaid carers: comparing the ASCOT-Carer, Carer Experience Scale and EQ-5D-3 L
title_full Measuring the outcomes of long-term care for unpaid carers: comparing the ASCOT-Carer, Carer Experience Scale and EQ-5D-3 L
title_fullStr Measuring the outcomes of long-term care for unpaid carers: comparing the ASCOT-Carer, Carer Experience Scale and EQ-5D-3 L
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the outcomes of long-term care for unpaid carers: comparing the ASCOT-Carer, Carer Experience Scale and EQ-5D-3 L
title_sort measuring the outcomes of long-term care for unpaid carers: comparing the ascot-carer, carer experience scale and eq-5d-3 l
publisher BMC
series Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
issn 1477-7525
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Abstract Background The ASCOT-Carer and Carer Experience Scale are instruments designed to capture aspects of quality of life ‘beyond health’ for family carers. The aim of this study was to compare and validate these two carer care-related measures, with a secondary aim to compare both instruments to the three-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3 L) measure of health-related quality of life. Methods An interview survey was conducted with 387 carers of adults who used long-term care (also known as social care) support in England. Construct validity by hypothesis testing was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficient. Exploratory factor analysis was also applied to investigate the dimensionality of the combined items from the ASCOT-Carer and CES (as measures of carer quality of life ‘beyond health’) and the EQ-5D (as a measure of health-related quality of life). Results In the construct validity analysis, hypothesised differences in correlations were observed with two exceptions. The exploratory factor analysis indicated that the ASCOT-Carer, CES and EQ-5D-3 L items loaded onto three separate factors. The first factor comprised the seven ASCOT-Carer items plus two CES items (activities outside caring, support from friends and family). The second factor comprised three of the six CES items (fulfilment from caring, control over caring and getting on with the person you care for). The third factor included four of the five EQ-5D-3 L items. Conclusion The findings indicate that the ASCOT-Carer, CES and EQ-5D-3 L capture separate constructs of social care-related quality of life (ASCOT-Carer) and carer experience (CES), which partially overlap in relation to activities outside caring and social support, and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3 L). The ASCOT-Carer and CES are both promising measures for the evaluation of social care support for carers that capture aspects of quality of life ‘beyond health’. The choice of whether to use the ASCOT-Carer or CES depends on the study objectives.
topic Quality of life
Caregiver
Social care
Long-term care
ASCOT-Carer
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1254-2
work_keys_str_mv AT staceyrand measuringtheoutcomesoflongtermcareforunpaidcarerscomparingtheascotcarercarerexperiencescaleandeq5d3l
AT juliettemalley measuringtheoutcomesoflongtermcareforunpaidcarerscomparingtheascotcarercarerexperiencescaleandeq5d3l
AT florinvadean measuringtheoutcomesoflongtermcareforunpaidcarerscomparingtheascotcarercarerexperiencescaleandeq5d3l
AT julienforder measuringtheoutcomesoflongtermcareforunpaidcarerscomparingtheascotcarercarerexperiencescaleandeq5d3l
_version_ 1724376980120403968