Platform Effects on Alternative Influencer Content: Understanding How Audiences and Channels Shape Misinformation Online

People are increasingly exposed to science and political information from social media. One consequence is that these sites play host to “alternative influencers,” who spread misinformation. However, content posted by alternative influencers on different social media platforms is unlikely to be homo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dan Hiaeshutter-Rice, Sedona Chinn, Kaiping Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Political Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2021.642394/full
id doaj-c081591a7160407cbf62e0ab102d779c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c081591a7160407cbf62e0ab102d779c2021-05-31T07:15:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Political Science2673-31452021-05-01310.3389/fpos.2021.642394642394Platform Effects on Alternative Influencer Content: Understanding How Audiences and Channels Shape Misinformation OnlineDan Hiaeshutter-Rice0Sedona Chinn1Kaiping Chen2Department of Advertising and Public Relations, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United StatesDepartment of Life Sciences Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United StatesDepartment of Life Sciences Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United StatesPeople are increasingly exposed to science and political information from social media. One consequence is that these sites play host to “alternative influencers,” who spread misinformation. However, content posted by alternative influencers on different social media platforms is unlikely to be homogenous. Our study uses computational methods to investigate how dimensions we refer to as audience and channel of social media platforms influence emotion and topics in content posted by “alternative influencers” on different platforms. Using COVID-19 as an example, we find that alternative influencers’ content contained more anger and fear words on Facebook and Twitter compared to YouTube. We also found that these actors discussed substantively different topics in their COVID-19 content on YouTube compared to Twitter and Facebook. With these findings, we discuss how the audience and channel of different social media platforms affect alternative influencers’ ability to spread misinformation online.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2021.642394/fullmisinformationsocial mediaalternative influencersplatformscomputational social science
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dan Hiaeshutter-Rice
Sedona Chinn
Kaiping Chen
spellingShingle Dan Hiaeshutter-Rice
Sedona Chinn
Kaiping Chen
Platform Effects on Alternative Influencer Content: Understanding How Audiences and Channels Shape Misinformation Online
Frontiers in Political Science
misinformation
social media
alternative influencers
platforms
computational social science
author_facet Dan Hiaeshutter-Rice
Sedona Chinn
Kaiping Chen
author_sort Dan Hiaeshutter-Rice
title Platform Effects on Alternative Influencer Content: Understanding How Audiences and Channels Shape Misinformation Online
title_short Platform Effects on Alternative Influencer Content: Understanding How Audiences and Channels Shape Misinformation Online
title_full Platform Effects on Alternative Influencer Content: Understanding How Audiences and Channels Shape Misinformation Online
title_fullStr Platform Effects on Alternative Influencer Content: Understanding How Audiences and Channels Shape Misinformation Online
title_full_unstemmed Platform Effects on Alternative Influencer Content: Understanding How Audiences and Channels Shape Misinformation Online
title_sort platform effects on alternative influencer content: understanding how audiences and channels shape misinformation online
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Political Science
issn 2673-3145
publishDate 2021-05-01
description People are increasingly exposed to science and political information from social media. One consequence is that these sites play host to “alternative influencers,” who spread misinformation. However, content posted by alternative influencers on different social media platforms is unlikely to be homogenous. Our study uses computational methods to investigate how dimensions we refer to as audience and channel of social media platforms influence emotion and topics in content posted by “alternative influencers” on different platforms. Using COVID-19 as an example, we find that alternative influencers’ content contained more anger and fear words on Facebook and Twitter compared to YouTube. We also found that these actors discussed substantively different topics in their COVID-19 content on YouTube compared to Twitter and Facebook. With these findings, we discuss how the audience and channel of different social media platforms affect alternative influencers’ ability to spread misinformation online.
topic misinformation
social media
alternative influencers
platforms
computational social science
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2021.642394/full
work_keys_str_mv AT danhiaeshutterrice platformeffectsonalternativeinfluencercontentunderstandinghowaudiencesandchannelsshapemisinformationonline
AT sedonachinn platformeffectsonalternativeinfluencercontentunderstandinghowaudiencesandchannelsshapemisinformationonline
AT kaipingchen platformeffectsonalternativeinfluencercontentunderstandinghowaudiencesandchannelsshapemisinformationonline
_version_ 1721419422279663616