Evaluation of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in diagnosing and staging prostate cancer - a prospective pilot study.

Aims: The main objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of End. MRI and MRSI in (1) detecting and (2) staging prostate cancer by correlating it with histopathological results. Methods: In a double blind prospective study of 20 patients were divided into two groups. In group A with 10 pat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M Dholakia, N Patil, P Shetty, A Khandkar, V Srinivas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2005-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2005;volume=21;issue=2;spage=106;epage=108;aulast=Dholakia
id doaj-c09786425df04c04b329cba20f75d7b4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c09786425df04c04b329cba20f75d7b42020-11-24T23:10:20ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Urology0970-15911998-38242005-01-0121210610810.4103/0970-1591.19631Evaluation of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in diagnosing and staging prostate cancer - a prospective pilot study.M DholakiaN PatilP ShettyA KhandkarV SrinivasAims: The main objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of End. MRI and MRSI in (1) detecting and (2) staging prostate cancer by correlating it with histopathological results. Methods: In a double blind prospective study of 20 patients were divided into two groups. In group A with 10 patients, the inclusion criteria were elevated PSA and/or a palpable nodule. All 10 patients with undiagnosed prostate cancer underwent End. MRI and MRSI followed by TRUS guided ten quadrant biopsy. In group B, 10 patients with already proven carcinoma prostate were included. All these patients underwent End. MRI and MRSI followed by radical prostatectomy. Results: The mean S.PSA was 19.8 ng/ml (1.9-52) and the mean Gleason score was 6.8 (5-8). In group A End. MRI/MRSI revealed a diagnosis of prostate cancer in 10 patients, but only six were positive on biopsy. In group B, End. MRI/MRSI showed eight patients to have periprostatic extension but only three were confirmed on final histology. Out of the eight patients that showed periprostatic spread on End. MRI/MRSI, seven patients showed seminal vesicle invasion, and one patient showed capsular infiltration. But on histopathology study seminal vesicle involvement was confirmed in only one patient and only two patients had capsular infiltration. Conclusions: This pilot study reveals that End.MRI/MRSI, although a relatively well-established investigation in the west, has not shown the same degree of accuracy in our setup.http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2005;volume=21;issue=2;spage=106;epage=108;aulast=DholakiaMagnetic resonance; Prostate cancer; Spectroscopic imaging
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M Dholakia
N Patil
P Shetty
A Khandkar
V Srinivas
spellingShingle M Dholakia
N Patil
P Shetty
A Khandkar
V Srinivas
Evaluation of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in diagnosing and staging prostate cancer - a prospective pilot study.
Indian Journal of Urology
Magnetic resonance; Prostate cancer; Spectroscopic imaging
author_facet M Dholakia
N Patil
P Shetty
A Khandkar
V Srinivas
author_sort M Dholakia
title Evaluation of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in diagnosing and staging prostate cancer - a prospective pilot study.
title_short Evaluation of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in diagnosing and staging prostate cancer - a prospective pilot study.
title_full Evaluation of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in diagnosing and staging prostate cancer - a prospective pilot study.
title_fullStr Evaluation of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in diagnosing and staging prostate cancer - a prospective pilot study.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in diagnosing and staging prostate cancer - a prospective pilot study.
title_sort evaluation of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in diagnosing and staging prostate cancer - a prospective pilot study.
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Urology
issn 0970-1591
1998-3824
publishDate 2005-01-01
description Aims: The main objective of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of End. MRI and MRSI in (1) detecting and (2) staging prostate cancer by correlating it with histopathological results. Methods: In a double blind prospective study of 20 patients were divided into two groups. In group A with 10 patients, the inclusion criteria were elevated PSA and/or a palpable nodule. All 10 patients with undiagnosed prostate cancer underwent End. MRI and MRSI followed by TRUS guided ten quadrant biopsy. In group B, 10 patients with already proven carcinoma prostate were included. All these patients underwent End. MRI and MRSI followed by radical prostatectomy. Results: The mean S.PSA was 19.8 ng/ml (1.9-52) and the mean Gleason score was 6.8 (5-8). In group A End. MRI/MRSI revealed a diagnosis of prostate cancer in 10 patients, but only six were positive on biopsy. In group B, End. MRI/MRSI showed eight patients to have periprostatic extension but only three were confirmed on final histology. Out of the eight patients that showed periprostatic spread on End. MRI/MRSI, seven patients showed seminal vesicle invasion, and one patient showed capsular infiltration. But on histopathology study seminal vesicle involvement was confirmed in only one patient and only two patients had capsular infiltration. Conclusions: This pilot study reveals that End.MRI/MRSI, although a relatively well-established investigation in the west, has not shown the same degree of accuracy in our setup.
topic Magnetic resonance; Prostate cancer; Spectroscopic imaging
url http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2005;volume=21;issue=2;spage=106;epage=108;aulast=Dholakia
work_keys_str_mv AT mdholakia evaluationofendorectalmagneticresonanceimagingandmagneticresonancespectroscopicimagingindiagnosingandstagingprostatecanceraprospectivepilotstudy
AT npatil evaluationofendorectalmagneticresonanceimagingandmagneticresonancespectroscopicimagingindiagnosingandstagingprostatecanceraprospectivepilotstudy
AT pshetty evaluationofendorectalmagneticresonanceimagingandmagneticresonancespectroscopicimagingindiagnosingandstagingprostatecanceraprospectivepilotstudy
AT akhandkar evaluationofendorectalmagneticresonanceimagingandmagneticresonancespectroscopicimagingindiagnosingandstagingprostatecanceraprospectivepilotstudy
AT vsrinivas evaluationofendorectalmagneticresonanceimagingandmagneticresonancespectroscopicimagingindiagnosingandstagingprostatecanceraprospectivepilotstudy
_version_ 1725607640161058816