Changing to remote management of a community heart failure population during COVID-19 – Clinician and patient perspectives’
Background: The COVID pandemic has challenged the traditional methods used in care of patients with heart failure (HF). Remote management of HF patients has been recommended in order to maintain routine standards of care, but satisfaction with this platform of care is unknown. We set out to address...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-12-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906720303638 |
id |
doaj-c0bbdfd9a70d4aa08305264af9dd6c44 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c0bbdfd9a70d4aa08305264af9dd6c442020-12-19T05:09:00ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature2352-90672020-12-0131100665Changing to remote management of a community heart failure population during COVID-19 – Clinician and patient perspectives’Brian Kerr0Rebabonye B. Pharithi1Matthew Barrett2Carmel Halley3Joe Gallagher4Mark Ledwidge5Kenneth McDonald6Heart Failure Unit, St Vincent University Hospital Healthcare Group, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland1; School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland1; Corresponding author at: St Vincent’s University Hospital, Elm Park, Nutley lane, Dublin 4, D04 T6F4, Ireland.Heart Failure Unit, St Vincent University Hospital Healthcare Group, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland1; School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland1Heart Failure Unit, St Vincent University Hospital Healthcare Group, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland1Heart Failure Unit, St Vincent University Hospital Healthcare Group, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland1School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland1School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland1Heart Failure Unit, St Vincent University Hospital Healthcare Group, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland1; School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland1Background: The COVID pandemic has challenged the traditional methods used in care of patients with heart failure (HF). Remote management of HF patients has been recommended in order to maintain routine standards of care, but satisfaction with this platform of care is unknown. We set out to address the physician and patient opinion of remote management of HF during COVID-19. Methods and Results: An observational report of the use of a Structured Telephonic assessment (STA) in stable outpatient HF patients. Physician grading of the STA was complemented by 100 randomly chosen patients to ascertain patient satisfaction and comment. 278 patients underwent a STA. Patient preference for STA was noted in 66%. Convenience was the single most cited reason for this preference (83.3%). The STA was deemed satisfactory by clinicians in 67.6%. The two-leading reasons for clinician dissatisfaction were data gaps providing a barrier to titration (55.6%) and need for clinical exam (18.9%). The annual review appointment visit subtype possessed the highest levels of satisfaction congruence amongst both clinicians and patients. Conclusion: In summary, this report demonstrates reasonable patient / physician satisfaction with STA, and provides some direction on how this care platform might be sustained beyond the COVID crisis.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906720303638Heart failureTelemedicineCOVID-19Remote patient monitoring |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Brian Kerr Rebabonye B. Pharithi Matthew Barrett Carmel Halley Joe Gallagher Mark Ledwidge Kenneth McDonald |
spellingShingle |
Brian Kerr Rebabonye B. Pharithi Matthew Barrett Carmel Halley Joe Gallagher Mark Ledwidge Kenneth McDonald Changing to remote management of a community heart failure population during COVID-19 – Clinician and patient perspectives’ International Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature Heart failure Telemedicine COVID-19 Remote patient monitoring |
author_facet |
Brian Kerr Rebabonye B. Pharithi Matthew Barrett Carmel Halley Joe Gallagher Mark Ledwidge Kenneth McDonald |
author_sort |
Brian Kerr |
title |
Changing to remote management of a community heart failure population during COVID-19 – Clinician and patient perspectives’ |
title_short |
Changing to remote management of a community heart failure population during COVID-19 – Clinician and patient perspectives’ |
title_full |
Changing to remote management of a community heart failure population during COVID-19 – Clinician and patient perspectives’ |
title_fullStr |
Changing to remote management of a community heart failure population during COVID-19 – Clinician and patient perspectives’ |
title_full_unstemmed |
Changing to remote management of a community heart failure population during COVID-19 – Clinician and patient perspectives’ |
title_sort |
changing to remote management of a community heart failure population during covid-19 – clinician and patient perspectives’ |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
International Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature |
issn |
2352-9067 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
Background: The COVID pandemic has challenged the traditional methods used in care of patients with heart failure (HF). Remote management of HF patients has been recommended in order to maintain routine standards of care, but satisfaction with this platform of care is unknown. We set out to address the physician and patient opinion of remote management of HF during COVID-19. Methods and Results: An observational report of the use of a Structured Telephonic assessment (STA) in stable outpatient HF patients. Physician grading of the STA was complemented by 100 randomly chosen patients to ascertain patient satisfaction and comment. 278 patients underwent a STA. Patient preference for STA was noted in 66%. Convenience was the single most cited reason for this preference (83.3%). The STA was deemed satisfactory by clinicians in 67.6%. The two-leading reasons for clinician dissatisfaction were data gaps providing a barrier to titration (55.6%) and need for clinical exam (18.9%). The annual review appointment visit subtype possessed the highest levels of satisfaction congruence amongst both clinicians and patients. Conclusion: In summary, this report demonstrates reasonable patient / physician satisfaction with STA, and provides some direction on how this care platform might be sustained beyond the COVID crisis. |
topic |
Heart failure Telemedicine COVID-19 Remote patient monitoring |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906720303638 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT briankerr changingtoremotemanagementofacommunityheartfailurepopulationduringcovid19clinicianandpatientperspectives AT rebabonyebpharithi changingtoremotemanagementofacommunityheartfailurepopulationduringcovid19clinicianandpatientperspectives AT matthewbarrett changingtoremotemanagementofacommunityheartfailurepopulationduringcovid19clinicianandpatientperspectives AT carmelhalley changingtoremotemanagementofacommunityheartfailurepopulationduringcovid19clinicianandpatientperspectives AT joegallagher changingtoremotemanagementofacommunityheartfailurepopulationduringcovid19clinicianandpatientperspectives AT markledwidge changingtoremotemanagementofacommunityheartfailurepopulationduringcovid19clinicianandpatientperspectives AT kennethmcdonald changingtoremotemanagementofacommunityheartfailurepopulationduringcovid19clinicianandpatientperspectives |
_version_ |
1724377686061613056 |