Performance of 2 Commercial Serologic Tests for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection

Reliable serologic tests are needed for diagnosis and surveillance of Zika virus infection. We evaluated the Euroimmun and Dia.Pro serologic tests for detection of Zika virus IgM and IgG by using a panel of 199 samples from a region endemic for flaviviruses. Kinetics of Zika virus antibodies were mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Séverine Matheus, Cheikh Talla, Bhety Labeau, Franck de Laval, Sébastien Briolant, Lena Berthelot, Muriel Vray, Dominique Rousset
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2019-06-01
Series:Emerging Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/25/6/18-0361_article
id doaj-c0cb349e9db64015bbbeb3919b3acb3d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c0cb349e9db64015bbbeb3919b3acb3d2020-11-25T00:20:49ZengCenters for Disease Control and PreventionEmerging Infectious Diseases1080-60401080-60592019-06-012561153116010.3201/eid2506.180361Performance of 2 Commercial Serologic Tests for Diagnosing Zika Virus InfectionSéverine MatheusCheikh TallaBhety LabeauFranck de LavalSébastien BriolantLena BerthelotMuriel VrayDominique RoussetReliable serologic tests are needed for diagnosis and surveillance of Zika virus infection. We evaluated the Euroimmun and Dia.Pro serologic tests for detection of Zika virus IgM and IgG by using a panel of 199 samples from a region endemic for flaviviruses. Kinetics of Zika virus antibodies were monitored from 300 sequential specimens sampled over a period of 10 months after infection. We observed suboptimal performance; sensitivity for Zika virus IgM was low, especially in the Euroimmun assay (49%), whereas IgM could be detected for months with the Dia.pro assay. The specificity of the Zika virus IgG assays was also low, especially that of Dia.Pro (62%); findings were strongly influenced by the epidemiologic context. These results highlight the complexity of serologic diagnosis of Zika virus infection in regions endemic for flaviviruses. Accurate analysis of the performance of assays is required to adapt and interpret algorithms.https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/25/6/18-0361_articleZika virusserologysensitivityspecificitycross reactionsantibody kinetics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Séverine Matheus
Cheikh Talla
Bhety Labeau
Franck de Laval
Sébastien Briolant
Lena Berthelot
Muriel Vray
Dominique Rousset
spellingShingle Séverine Matheus
Cheikh Talla
Bhety Labeau
Franck de Laval
Sébastien Briolant
Lena Berthelot
Muriel Vray
Dominique Rousset
Performance of 2 Commercial Serologic Tests for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Zika virus
serology
sensitivity
specificity
cross reactions
antibody kinetics
author_facet Séverine Matheus
Cheikh Talla
Bhety Labeau
Franck de Laval
Sébastien Briolant
Lena Berthelot
Muriel Vray
Dominique Rousset
author_sort Séverine Matheus
title Performance of 2 Commercial Serologic Tests for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection
title_short Performance of 2 Commercial Serologic Tests for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection
title_full Performance of 2 Commercial Serologic Tests for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection
title_fullStr Performance of 2 Commercial Serologic Tests for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection
title_full_unstemmed Performance of 2 Commercial Serologic Tests for Diagnosing Zika Virus Infection
title_sort performance of 2 commercial serologic tests for diagnosing zika virus infection
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
series Emerging Infectious Diseases
issn 1080-6040
1080-6059
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Reliable serologic tests are needed for diagnosis and surveillance of Zika virus infection. We evaluated the Euroimmun and Dia.Pro serologic tests for detection of Zika virus IgM and IgG by using a panel of 199 samples from a region endemic for flaviviruses. Kinetics of Zika virus antibodies were monitored from 300 sequential specimens sampled over a period of 10 months after infection. We observed suboptimal performance; sensitivity for Zika virus IgM was low, especially in the Euroimmun assay (49%), whereas IgM could be detected for months with the Dia.pro assay. The specificity of the Zika virus IgG assays was also low, especially that of Dia.Pro (62%); findings were strongly influenced by the epidemiologic context. These results highlight the complexity of serologic diagnosis of Zika virus infection in regions endemic for flaviviruses. Accurate analysis of the performance of assays is required to adapt and interpret algorithms.
topic Zika virus
serology
sensitivity
specificity
cross reactions
antibody kinetics
url https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/25/6/18-0361_article
work_keys_str_mv AT severinematheus performanceof2commercialserologictestsfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection
AT cheikhtalla performanceof2commercialserologictestsfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection
AT bhetylabeau performanceof2commercialserologictestsfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection
AT franckdelaval performanceof2commercialserologictestsfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection
AT sebastienbriolant performanceof2commercialserologictestsfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection
AT lenaberthelot performanceof2commercialserologictestsfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection
AT murielvray performanceof2commercialserologictestsfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection
AT dominiquerousset performanceof2commercialserologictestsfordiagnosingzikavirusinfection
_version_ 1725365732716314624