Designing a Voluntary Beef Checkoff
Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court considered whether the mandatory fees imposed by the beef checkoff violates the First Amendment. As a precaution, many states began forming voluntary beef checkoffs, where funds would be raised through voluntary contributions. This study conducted a survey of Oklahom...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Western Agricultural Economics Association
2006-04-01
|
Series: | Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/10149 |
id |
doaj-c0e1dc2f08f640e3b4630e7c920fbfe9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c0e1dc2f08f640e3b4630e7c920fbfe92020-11-25T02:39:14ZengWestern Agricultural Economics AssociationJournal of Agricultural and Resource Economics1068-55022327-82852006-04-01311749210.22004/ag.econ.1014910149Designing a Voluntary Beef CheckoffF. Bailey NorwoodChris WinnChanjin ChungClement E. WardRecently, the U.S. Supreme Court considered whether the mandatory fees imposed by the beef checkoff violates the First Amendment. As a precaution, many states began forming voluntary beef checkoffs, where funds would be raised through voluntary contributions. This study conducted a survey of Oklahoma cattle producers to determine what type of voluntary checkoff design would receive the greatest support. The most popular checkoff placed a large emphasis on advertising and a slightly lower checkoff fee. The survey also tested the ability of a provision point mechanism to limit free-riding. The mechanism was not as effective as in other studies which used laboratory experiments.https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/10149beef marketingcheckofffree-riderprovision point mechanismpublic good |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
F. Bailey Norwood Chris Winn Chanjin Chung Clement E. Ward |
spellingShingle |
F. Bailey Norwood Chris Winn Chanjin Chung Clement E. Ward Designing a Voluntary Beef Checkoff Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics beef marketing checkoff free-rider provision point mechanism public good |
author_facet |
F. Bailey Norwood Chris Winn Chanjin Chung Clement E. Ward |
author_sort |
F. Bailey Norwood |
title |
Designing a Voluntary Beef Checkoff |
title_short |
Designing a Voluntary Beef Checkoff |
title_full |
Designing a Voluntary Beef Checkoff |
title_fullStr |
Designing a Voluntary Beef Checkoff |
title_full_unstemmed |
Designing a Voluntary Beef Checkoff |
title_sort |
designing a voluntary beef checkoff |
publisher |
Western Agricultural Economics Association |
series |
Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics |
issn |
1068-5502 2327-8285 |
publishDate |
2006-04-01 |
description |
Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court considered whether the mandatory fees imposed by the beef checkoff violates the First Amendment. As a precaution, many states began forming voluntary beef checkoffs, where funds would be raised through voluntary contributions. This study conducted a survey of Oklahoma cattle producers to determine what type of voluntary checkoff design would receive the greatest support. The most popular checkoff placed a large emphasis on advertising and a slightly lower checkoff fee. The survey also tested the ability of a provision point mechanism to limit free-riding. The mechanism was not as effective as in other studies which used laboratory experiments. |
topic |
beef marketing checkoff free-rider provision point mechanism public good |
url |
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/10149 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fbaileynorwood designingavoluntarybeefcheckoff AT chriswinn designingavoluntarybeefcheckoff AT chanjinchung designingavoluntarybeefcheckoff AT clementeward designingavoluntarybeefcheckoff |
_version_ |
1724787597457227776 |