Designing a Voluntary Beef Checkoff

Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court considered whether the mandatory fees imposed by the beef checkoff violates the First Amendment. As a precaution, many states began forming voluntary beef checkoffs, where funds would be raised through voluntary contributions. This study conducted a survey of Oklahom...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. Bailey Norwood, Chris Winn, Chanjin Chung, Clement E. Ward
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Western Agricultural Economics Association 2006-04-01
Series:Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/10149
id doaj-c0e1dc2f08f640e3b4630e7c920fbfe9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c0e1dc2f08f640e3b4630e7c920fbfe92020-11-25T02:39:14ZengWestern Agricultural Economics AssociationJournal of Agricultural and Resource Economics1068-55022327-82852006-04-01311749210.22004/ag.econ.1014910149Designing a Voluntary Beef CheckoffF. Bailey NorwoodChris WinnChanjin ChungClement E. WardRecently, the U.S. Supreme Court considered whether the mandatory fees imposed by the beef checkoff violates the First Amendment. As a precaution, many states began forming voluntary beef checkoffs, where funds would be raised through voluntary contributions. This study conducted a survey of Oklahoma cattle producers to determine what type of voluntary checkoff design would receive the greatest support. The most popular checkoff placed a large emphasis on advertising and a slightly lower checkoff fee. The survey also tested the ability of a provision point mechanism to limit free-riding. The mechanism was not as effective as in other studies which used laboratory experiments.https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/10149beef marketingcheckofffree-riderprovision point mechanismpublic good
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author F. Bailey Norwood
Chris Winn
Chanjin Chung
Clement E. Ward
spellingShingle F. Bailey Norwood
Chris Winn
Chanjin Chung
Clement E. Ward
Designing a Voluntary Beef Checkoff
Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
beef marketing
checkoff
free-rider
provision point mechanism
public good
author_facet F. Bailey Norwood
Chris Winn
Chanjin Chung
Clement E. Ward
author_sort F. Bailey Norwood
title Designing a Voluntary Beef Checkoff
title_short Designing a Voluntary Beef Checkoff
title_full Designing a Voluntary Beef Checkoff
title_fullStr Designing a Voluntary Beef Checkoff
title_full_unstemmed Designing a Voluntary Beef Checkoff
title_sort designing a voluntary beef checkoff
publisher Western Agricultural Economics Association
series Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
issn 1068-5502
2327-8285
publishDate 2006-04-01
description Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court considered whether the mandatory fees imposed by the beef checkoff violates the First Amendment. As a precaution, many states began forming voluntary beef checkoffs, where funds would be raised through voluntary contributions. This study conducted a survey of Oklahoma cattle producers to determine what type of voluntary checkoff design would receive the greatest support. The most popular checkoff placed a large emphasis on advertising and a slightly lower checkoff fee. The survey also tested the ability of a provision point mechanism to limit free-riding. The mechanism was not as effective as in other studies which used laboratory experiments.
topic beef marketing
checkoff
free-rider
provision point mechanism
public good
url https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/10149
work_keys_str_mv AT fbaileynorwood designingavoluntarybeefcheckoff
AT chriswinn designingavoluntarybeefcheckoff
AT chanjinchung designingavoluntarybeefcheckoff
AT clementeward designingavoluntarybeefcheckoff
_version_ 1724787597457227776