Shear bond strength of posterior comp-osite cores

Abstract This study was designed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of posterior composite resin cores to tooth surface using two dental adhesives and two retentive means. Thirty extracted permanent molars were used for this purpose. They were made flat by removing the occlusal one third...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jabbar H Kamel, Abdul–Adheem R Al–Mallah, Ahmed H Kharoufa
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: University of Mosul, College of Dentistry 2005-01-01
Series:Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_45516_4f400301a51cbd2a3dabe3503dedf069.html
id doaj-c0e26a4fed8e4868a90766775a5b913b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c0e26a4fed8e4868a90766775a5b913b2020-11-25T03:46:37ZaraUniversity of Mosul, College of DentistryAl-Rafidain Dental Journal 1812-12171998-03452005-01-015110.33899/rden.2005.45516Shear bond strength of posterior comp-osite coresJabbar H KamelAbdul–Adheem R Al–MallahAhmed H KharoufaAbstract This study was designed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of posterior composite resin cores to tooth surface using two dental adhesives and two retentive means. Thirty extracted permanent molars were used for this purpose. They were made flat by removing the occlusal one third using “stone grinding wheal”. Teeth were then randomly divided into six groups: Groups I and IV: Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (SbMP) and All bond 2 dental adhesives were used for groups I and IV respectively to adhere composite to the flat tooth surface with no retentive mean as the control group. Groups II and V: A circumferential slot was prepared and composite attached to the tooth using SbMP and All bond 2 for groups II and V respectively. Groups III and VI: Four self threading pins were placed and composite adhered using SbMP and All bond 2 for groups III and VI respectively. After storage and thermal cycling, the SBS for each group was measured using “universal testing machine”. The results varied according to the retentive mean and dental adhesive used. Groups with four pins produced the highest SBS and groups with no retentive mean showed the lowest SBS. Also the groups using All bond 2 adhesive generally had higher values when compared with the same groups using SbMP dental adhesive. Within the limits of this study, it is indicated that when the highest SBS is to be achieved, then All bond 2 dental adhesive with pins should be used.https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_45516_4f400301a51cbd2a3dabe3503dedf069.htmlshear strengthcomposite cores.
collection DOAJ
language Arabic
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jabbar H Kamel
Abdul–Adheem R Al–Mallah
Ahmed H Kharoufa
spellingShingle Jabbar H Kamel
Abdul–Adheem R Al–Mallah
Ahmed H Kharoufa
Shear bond strength of posterior comp-osite cores
Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
shear strength
composite cores.
author_facet Jabbar H Kamel
Abdul–Adheem R Al–Mallah
Ahmed H Kharoufa
author_sort Jabbar H Kamel
title Shear bond strength of posterior comp-osite cores
title_short Shear bond strength of posterior comp-osite cores
title_full Shear bond strength of posterior comp-osite cores
title_fullStr Shear bond strength of posterior comp-osite cores
title_full_unstemmed Shear bond strength of posterior comp-osite cores
title_sort shear bond strength of posterior comp-osite cores
publisher University of Mosul, College of Dentistry
series Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
issn 1812-1217
1998-0345
publishDate 2005-01-01
description Abstract This study was designed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of posterior composite resin cores to tooth surface using two dental adhesives and two retentive means. Thirty extracted permanent molars were used for this purpose. They were made flat by removing the occlusal one third using “stone grinding wheal”. Teeth were then randomly divided into six groups: Groups I and IV: Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (SbMP) and All bond 2 dental adhesives were used for groups I and IV respectively to adhere composite to the flat tooth surface with no retentive mean as the control group. Groups II and V: A circumferential slot was prepared and composite attached to the tooth using SbMP and All bond 2 for groups II and V respectively. Groups III and VI: Four self threading pins were placed and composite adhered using SbMP and All bond 2 for groups III and VI respectively. After storage and thermal cycling, the SBS for each group was measured using “universal testing machine”. The results varied according to the retentive mean and dental adhesive used. Groups with four pins produced the highest SBS and groups with no retentive mean showed the lowest SBS. Also the groups using All bond 2 adhesive generally had higher values when compared with the same groups using SbMP dental adhesive. Within the limits of this study, it is indicated that when the highest SBS is to be achieved, then All bond 2 dental adhesive with pins should be used.
topic shear strength
composite cores.
url https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_45516_4f400301a51cbd2a3dabe3503dedf069.html
work_keys_str_mv AT jabbarhkamel shearbondstrengthofposteriorcompositecores
AT abduladheemralmallah shearbondstrengthofposteriorcompositecores
AT ahmedhkharoufa shearbondstrengthofposteriorcompositecores
_version_ 1724505332936343552