Comparison of rapid vs in-depth qualitative analytic methods from a process evaluation of academic detailing in the Veterans Health Administration
Abstract Background It is challenging to conduct and quickly disseminate findings from in-depth qualitative analyses, which can impede timely implementation of interventions because of its time-consuming methods. To better understand tradeoffs between the need for actionable results and scientific r...
Main Authors: | Randall C. Gale, Justina Wu, Taryn Erhardt, Mark Bounthavong, Caitlin M. Reardon, Laura J. Damschroder, Amanda M. Midboe |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-02-01
|
Series: | Implementation Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13012-019-0853-y |
Similar Items
-
Rapid versus traditional qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
by: Andrea L. Nevedal, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
Implementation and sustainment of diverse practices in a large integrated health system: a mixed methods study
by: Andrea L. Nevedal, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Mapping the organizational readiness to change assessment to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
by: Jennifer Kononowech, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Implementation findings from a hybrid III implementation-effectiveness trial of the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
by: Laura J. Damschroder, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01) -
Implementation of a national policy for improving health and social care: a comparative case study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
by: Helena Strehlenert, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01)