Higher Incision at Upper Part of Lower Segment Caesarean Section
Introduction: To determine if the upper part of the lower segment of the uterus is a better site for cesarean incision then the traditionally used lower end. Methods: This is a case-control study (1:1 ratio) conducted from 1st October 2012– 30th September 2013 observed between transverse...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nepal Medical Association
2014-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Nepal Medical Association |
Online Access: | http://jnma.com.np/jnma/index.php/jnma/article/view/2727 |
id |
doaj-c0f76a836b0c4de5885b9d9736ad88fd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c0f76a836b0c4de5885b9d9736ad88fd2020-11-24T22:49:00ZengNepal Medical AssociationJournal of Nepal Medical Association0028-27151815-672X2014-06-01521947647702727Higher Incision at Upper Part of Lower Segment Caesarean SectionYong Shao0Meena Pradhan1The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, PR China.The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, PR China.Introduction: To determine if the upper part of the lower segment of the uterus is a better site for cesarean incision then the traditionally used lower end. Methods: This is a case-control study (1:1 ratio) conducted from 1st October 2012– 30th September 2013 observed between transverse incision at the upper part of the lower segment versus traditional lower segment of the uterus. Two hundred caesarean sections were performed via a transverse uterine incision at the upper part of the lower segment and equal numbers of uterine incision was performed at traditional lower segment. To obtain less intraoperative bleeding high incision made at thicker wider muscular part at of the upper part of lower segment about 2-3 cm distances from vesico-uterine serosa. Results: The estimated volume of blood loss in high incision 188±60.1 ml was significantly less compared to traditional incision 330.1± 86.5 ml (p<0.05). Duration of operation 30.5± 6.6 minute versus 45.3±7.2 minute and tearing the uterine incision was significantly less with the high incision versus traditional incision. Other procedural and patient benefits are noted. Conclusions: An incision at the upper part of the lower segment reduces blood loss, enhances uterine retraction, predisposes to fewer complications, is easier to repair, precludes bladder adhesion to the suture line and reduces operation time. Keywords: caesarean section; higher incision technique; traditional uterine incision technique.http://jnma.com.np/jnma/index.php/jnma/article/view/2727 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yong Shao Meena Pradhan |
spellingShingle |
Yong Shao Meena Pradhan Higher Incision at Upper Part of Lower Segment Caesarean Section Journal of Nepal Medical Association |
author_facet |
Yong Shao Meena Pradhan |
author_sort |
Yong Shao |
title |
Higher Incision at Upper Part of Lower Segment Caesarean Section |
title_short |
Higher Incision at Upper Part of Lower Segment Caesarean Section |
title_full |
Higher Incision at Upper Part of Lower Segment Caesarean Section |
title_fullStr |
Higher Incision at Upper Part of Lower Segment Caesarean Section |
title_full_unstemmed |
Higher Incision at Upper Part of Lower Segment Caesarean Section |
title_sort |
higher incision at upper part of lower segment caesarean section |
publisher |
Nepal Medical Association |
series |
Journal of Nepal Medical Association |
issn |
0028-2715 1815-672X |
publishDate |
2014-06-01 |
description |
Introduction: To determine if the upper part of the lower segment of the uterus is a better site for cesarean incision then the traditionally used lower end.
Methods: This is a case-control study (1:1 ratio) conducted from 1st October 2012– 30th September 2013 observed between transverse incision at the upper part of the lower segment versus traditional lower segment of the uterus. Two hundred caesarean sections were performed via a transverse uterine incision at the upper part of the lower segment and equal numbers of uterine incision was performed at traditional lower segment. To obtain less intraoperative bleeding high incision made at thicker wider muscular part at of the upper part of lower segment about 2-3 cm distances from vesico-uterine serosa.
Results: The estimated volume of blood loss in high incision 188±60.1 ml was significantly less compared to traditional incision 330.1± 86.5 ml (p<0.05). Duration of operation 30.5± 6.6 minute versus 45.3±7.2 minute and tearing the uterine incision was significantly less with the high incision versus traditional incision. Other procedural and patient benefits are noted.
Conclusions: An incision at the upper part of the lower segment reduces blood loss, enhances uterine retraction, predisposes to fewer complications, is easier to repair, precludes bladder adhesion to the suture line and reduces operation time.
Keywords: caesarean section; higher incision technique; traditional uterine incision technique. |
url |
http://jnma.com.np/jnma/index.php/jnma/article/view/2727 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yongshao higherincisionatupperpartoflowersegmentcaesareansection AT meenapradhan higherincisionatupperpartoflowersegmentcaesareansection |
_version_ |
1725677616798629888 |