Higher Incision at Upper Part of Lower Segment Caesarean Section

Introduction: To determine if the upper part of the lower segment of the uterus is a better site for cesarean incision then the traditionally used lower end. 
 Methods: This is a case-control study (1:1 ratio) conducted from 1st October 2012– 30th September 2013 observed between transverse...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yong Shao, Meena Pradhan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nepal Medical Association 2014-06-01
Series:Journal of Nepal Medical Association
Online Access:http://jnma.com.np/jnma/index.php/jnma/article/view/2727
id doaj-c0f76a836b0c4de5885b9d9736ad88fd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c0f76a836b0c4de5885b9d9736ad88fd2020-11-24T22:49:00ZengNepal Medical AssociationJournal of Nepal Medical Association0028-27151815-672X2014-06-01521947647702727Higher Incision at Upper Part of Lower Segment Caesarean SectionYong Shao0Meena Pradhan1The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, PR China.The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, PR China.Introduction: To determine if the upper part of the lower segment of the uterus is a better site for cesarean incision then the traditionally used lower end. 
 Methods: This is a case-control study (1:1 ratio) conducted from 1st October 2012– 30th September 2013 observed between transverse incision at the upper part of the lower segment versus traditional lower segment of the uterus. Two hundred caesarean sections were performed via a transverse uterine incision at the upper part of the lower segment and equal numbers of uterine incision was performed at traditional lower segment. To obtain less intraoperative bleeding high incision made at thicker wider muscular part at of the upper part of lower segment about 2-3 cm distances from vesico-uterine serosa. 
 Results: The estimated volume of blood loss in high incision 188±60.1 ml was significantly less compared to traditional incision 330.1± 86.5 ml (p<0.05). Duration of operation 30.5± 6.6 minute versus 45.3±7.2 minute and tearing the uterine incision was significantly less with the high incision versus traditional incision. Other procedural and patient benefits are noted. 
 Conclusions: An incision at the upper part of the lower segment reduces blood loss, enhances uterine retraction, predisposes to fewer complications, is easier to repair, precludes bladder adhesion to the suture line and reduces operation time. 
 Keywords: caesarean section; higher incision technique; traditional uterine incision technique.http://jnma.com.np/jnma/index.php/jnma/article/view/2727
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yong Shao
Meena Pradhan
spellingShingle Yong Shao
Meena Pradhan
Higher Incision at Upper Part of Lower Segment Caesarean Section
Journal of Nepal Medical Association
author_facet Yong Shao
Meena Pradhan
author_sort Yong Shao
title Higher Incision at Upper Part of Lower Segment Caesarean Section
title_short Higher Incision at Upper Part of Lower Segment Caesarean Section
title_full Higher Incision at Upper Part of Lower Segment Caesarean Section
title_fullStr Higher Incision at Upper Part of Lower Segment Caesarean Section
title_full_unstemmed Higher Incision at Upper Part of Lower Segment Caesarean Section
title_sort higher incision at upper part of lower segment caesarean section
publisher Nepal Medical Association
series Journal of Nepal Medical Association
issn 0028-2715
1815-672X
publishDate 2014-06-01
description Introduction: To determine if the upper part of the lower segment of the uterus is a better site for cesarean incision then the traditionally used lower end. 
 Methods: This is a case-control study (1:1 ratio) conducted from 1st October 2012– 30th September 2013 observed between transverse incision at the upper part of the lower segment versus traditional lower segment of the uterus. Two hundred caesarean sections were performed via a transverse uterine incision at the upper part of the lower segment and equal numbers of uterine incision was performed at traditional lower segment. To obtain less intraoperative bleeding high incision made at thicker wider muscular part at of the upper part of lower segment about 2-3 cm distances from vesico-uterine serosa. 
 Results: The estimated volume of blood loss in high incision 188±60.1 ml was significantly less compared to traditional incision 330.1± 86.5 ml (p<0.05). Duration of operation 30.5± 6.6 minute versus 45.3±7.2 minute and tearing the uterine incision was significantly less with the high incision versus traditional incision. Other procedural and patient benefits are noted. 
 Conclusions: An incision at the upper part of the lower segment reduces blood loss, enhances uterine retraction, predisposes to fewer complications, is easier to repair, precludes bladder adhesion to the suture line and reduces operation time. 
 Keywords: caesarean section; higher incision technique; traditional uterine incision technique.
url http://jnma.com.np/jnma/index.php/jnma/article/view/2727
work_keys_str_mv AT yongshao higherincisionatupperpartoflowersegmentcaesareansection
AT meenapradhan higherincisionatupperpartoflowersegmentcaesareansection
_version_ 1725677616798629888