Cultural Heritage Viability: An Example of Traditional Transport in Central Europe

This paper focuses on traditional transport as a form of cultural heritage in Central Europe, looking at the modes of transport that are still viable today as a part of people’s lives and livelihoods, as well as strategies to ensure their survival. The importance of preserving the original purpose o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aleš Smrčka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Muzeológia a kultúrne dedičstvo, o.z. 2021-06-01
Series:Muzeológia a Kultúrne Dedičstvo
Subjects:
Online Access:https://muzeologia.sk/index_htm_files/mkd_2_21_smrcka.pdf
id doaj-c1223ae4b67f4aa1aba25ccb456ade00
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c1223ae4b67f4aa1aba25ccb456ade002021-07-02T19:46:47ZengMuzeológia a kultúrne dedičstvo, o.z.Muzeológia a Kultúrne Dedičstvo1339-22042453-97592021-06-0192274410.46284/mkd.2021.9.2.2Cultural Heritage Viability: An Example of Traditional Transport in Central EuropeAleš Smrčka0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7279-8053Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of EthnologyThis paper focuses on traditional transport as a form of cultural heritage in Central Europe, looking at the modes of transport that are still viable today as a part of people’s lives and livelihoods, as well as strategies to ensure their survival. The importance of preserving the original purpose of traditional transport modes, as well as their acquisition of new functions in the modern era, are examined in the context of the sustainability and viability of cultural heritage. The article also highlights crucial role of promoting the visibility of cultural phenomena to the public in encouraging their protection and ongoing sustainability. It also draws attention to some less positive examples of how forms of traditional transport are currently presented, examining approaches that may lead to the alteration of traditions and the construction of distorted images of cultural heritage. In the conclusion, I propose distinguishing between forms of traditional transport that continue to maintain people’s livelihoods or generate entertainment, and forms which are merely reconstructions of traditional phenomena, intended only as imitations to recall the past.https://muzeologia.sk/index_htm_files/mkd_2_21_smrcka.pdfcultural heritage viabilitytraditional transportintangible cultural heritage (ich)unescocentral europe
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aleš Smrčka
spellingShingle Aleš Smrčka
Cultural Heritage Viability: An Example of Traditional Transport in Central Europe
Muzeológia a Kultúrne Dedičstvo
cultural heritage viability
traditional transport
intangible cultural heritage (ich)
unesco
central europe
author_facet Aleš Smrčka
author_sort Aleš Smrčka
title Cultural Heritage Viability: An Example of Traditional Transport in Central Europe
title_short Cultural Heritage Viability: An Example of Traditional Transport in Central Europe
title_full Cultural Heritage Viability: An Example of Traditional Transport in Central Europe
title_fullStr Cultural Heritage Viability: An Example of Traditional Transport in Central Europe
title_full_unstemmed Cultural Heritage Viability: An Example of Traditional Transport in Central Europe
title_sort cultural heritage viability: an example of traditional transport in central europe
publisher Muzeológia a kultúrne dedičstvo, o.z.
series Muzeológia a Kultúrne Dedičstvo
issn 1339-2204
2453-9759
publishDate 2021-06-01
description This paper focuses on traditional transport as a form of cultural heritage in Central Europe, looking at the modes of transport that are still viable today as a part of people’s lives and livelihoods, as well as strategies to ensure their survival. The importance of preserving the original purpose of traditional transport modes, as well as their acquisition of new functions in the modern era, are examined in the context of the sustainability and viability of cultural heritage. The article also highlights crucial role of promoting the visibility of cultural phenomena to the public in encouraging their protection and ongoing sustainability. It also draws attention to some less positive examples of how forms of traditional transport are currently presented, examining approaches that may lead to the alteration of traditions and the construction of distorted images of cultural heritage. In the conclusion, I propose distinguishing between forms of traditional transport that continue to maintain people’s livelihoods or generate entertainment, and forms which are merely reconstructions of traditional phenomena, intended only as imitations to recall the past.
topic cultural heritage viability
traditional transport
intangible cultural heritage (ich)
unesco
central europe
url https://muzeologia.sk/index_htm_files/mkd_2_21_smrcka.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT alessmrcka culturalheritageviabilityanexampleoftraditionaltransportincentraleurope
_version_ 1721323456192053248